unforum

Rednaxella · Boot Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 18

just a stab in the dark ( God I love that phrase Razz

)

Could the size of the flash be significant. 1953?

a Birthdate?
It was the showing date of the film Julius Caesar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar_(1953_movie)

Laughing

Just going to check on the metadex

**Posted:** Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:48 pm

bakntime

Just one more thing - the main page of the Aquapolis flash says "Opening Winter 2004", yet the news section (from August 1st 2003) last mentions an opening in Fall 2004, and that construction is "ahead of schedule".

Winter 2004, I assume, means January-February of 2004, but Fall 2004 would be months later... perhaps October/November of that year. That's a pretty large discrepancy.

**Posted:** Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:07 pm

yanka

**Posted:** Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:21 pm

_________________
Annushka has already bought the sunflower oil, and has not only bought it, but has already spilled it.

Omnie · Entrenched Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 772

**Posted:** Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:29 pm

bakntime

**Posted:** Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:35 pm

Semioclast · Boot Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 68

Clock

**Posted:** Sat Nov 01, 2003 1:16 am

_________________
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." --Umberto Eco

KnowThySelf · Boot Joined: 28 Oct 2003 Posts: 21 Location: Hades

**Posted:** Sat Nov 01, 2003 1:28 am

bakntime

Re: Clock

**Posted:** Sat Nov 01, 2003 1:37 pm

bakntime

Just a few more things that haven't been mentioned about the 3 incidentlog photos of the guy under water. Not sure if any of this means anything, but I figured I'd mention it.

---The 3 pitctures are not the same dimensions:

Picture 1: 578x295
Picture 2: 586x289
Picture 3: 586x301

Why the size differences? This is further proof that the photos are not computer generated, but rather someone took photographs of a security screen.

--- The pictures are are wider than normal. When I resized the pictures to 640x480, they look much more appropriate. Why are they not "standard" TV 4x3 pictures? How does an image get stretched that much? One possiblity is that the pictures were not taken "straight" ahead toward the screen - they are taken at a significant angle either above or below the monitor. This could aslo presumably be to make sure that the photograhper didn't "catch himself" in the reflection on the screen.

--- The reflected lights in the photos are not in exactly the same position each time, which lends further to the idea that somebody made these by photographing a security screen.

**Posted:** Sat Nov 01, 2003 3:04 pm

bakntime

And since I'm bored Razz

The Module Connection Tube photo looked to have a red "streak" running through the middle, so I photoshopped around a little and came up with this side by side comparison picture of the original and the color re-balanced image.

It doesn't look like much to me, but it confirmed that there is definitely a red streak running through the middle of the picture. Could be just coincidence, or perhaps not. Does the streak look at all familiar? It almost looks like waves crashing on a shore...

**Posted:** Sat Nov 01, 2003 3:41 pm

bakntime

Is it just me or is the Aquapolis construction cam scrolling slower that it was before Question

**Posted:** Sat Nov 01, 2003 11:13 pm

mulder · Boot Joined: 23 Oct 2003 Posts: 53

The message everybody got... said something about "Message to Marcus blah blah blah at 5:39..."
At that time exacly this guy was sort of dictating some sort of LOG (to marcus?), when the alarms go of... but... these last logs have the time about 2 something... so... that means some other accident happened?? no logs due the electrical problems?

**Posted:** Sun Nov 02, 2003 12:08 am

_________________
The Truth is Out There

bakntime

**Posted:** Sun Nov 02, 2003 12:13 am

Giskard

Bakntime, that red streak you found could also be TV static, including a horizontal bar you often get when taking photographs of TV-screens, don't you agree? This would support your theory...

And also, because Dina does this too, let's throw in a Bible-reference in relation to the 5:39 timestamp:

John 5
39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

**Posted:** Sun Nov 02, 2003 7:25 am

_________________
"They never tell you truth is subjective, they only tell you not to lie." -- Gary Jules