Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 12, 2024 2:58 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
[VIDEO] Entry #26
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 34 of 35 [518 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 32, 33, 34, 35  Next
Author Message
8bitFilk
Veteran


Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 145

Also, the phrase: "Smile for the camera" has appeared a number of times, and the Warning video ends with the phrase: "Smile for death", clearly suggesting that cameras are dangerous and significant.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:08 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Zaden
Decorated


Joined: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 168
Location: Washington State

Am I one of the only people who think the image of Skull is insignificant?

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
redherring
Unfettered


Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 469
Location: NJ

Zaden wrote:
Am I one of the only people who think the image of Skull is insignificant?


Not the only one.

Well, I guess I don't think it's more significant than any of the other stuff on there. I'm not convinced yet it's 'another Masky' or anything of the sort.

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:11 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?


Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 2578
Location: Cowtown, AB

Regarding the chest cam being a direct link to the spotting of a skull-faced mask in #26, I don't think that we can necessarily connect the two; remember that this tape was found before the seven month lapse in Jay's memory even began, and there was other footage of Alex exploring that I think sets the tape as having been while Alex was in his investigative phase, before he cut loose and ran.

I think that rather than connecting hotels, it potentially connects either Alex and the chest-cam, or the chest-cam to whomever was with Alex to film his investigations. (This could mean Seth, Brian, Tim or Sarah, of course.) So I think that if we're going to make any connections, I feel the more likely one is that Jay was in contact with one or more of the MH cast to have picked the chest-cam up, rather than that there was time-warping. It also means that at that time someone was acting as a TTA to Alex or another member of the crew, which seems appropriate given that Jay is in a similar place. (So, basically, what JKat said! XD)

8bitFilk wrote:
Early Opinions

Regarding the filming having Slendy appear: the camera freezes on Alex's face for several moments, and the Operator appears shortly afterwards!

Many people have suggested that the camera was planted; that Alex hadn't originally had a camera to begin with, and that a third party placed it there. So it could have been that Alex was being honest about not having one. As for him being calm, I think that may just be in comparison to Amy's panic. He doesn't seem especially calm, just as though he is doing the best he can to handle a hazardous situation.

Zaden wrote:
Am I one of the only people who think the image of Skull is insignificant?


Hmm, how do you mean by insignificant?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:38 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Zaden
Decorated


Joined: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 168
Location: Washington State

^I mean that there is less content about Skull than there is of the bullet casing found in The House.

People are jumping all over ideas of who Skull is, including "Skull is the new Mask." Mask was introduced by actually interacting with Jay (tackling the crap out him!), which I think is huge as far as significance to the story, not to mention that Mask appears in several videos. It just seems weird that there be so much discussion over a simple image that hasn't even reoccurred yet. It seems fitting that there is theorization concerning Jessica because she has appeared in two videos, making it unlikely to be a random encounter. To me, even the white doll in The House is more outstanding than Skull.

Right now, it appears it was just a random, freaky image much like the sinking of the Arizona.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:48 pm
Last edited by Zaden on Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
mellodragon
Veteran


Joined: 04 May 2010
Posts: 94
Location: Memphis

Zaden wrote:
^I mean that there is less content about Skull than there is of the bullet casing found in The House.

People are jumping all over ideas of who Skull is, including "Skull is the new Mask." Mask was introduced by actually interacting with Jay (tackling the crap out him!), which I think is huge as far as significance to the story, not to mention that Mask appears in several videos. It just seems weird that there be so much discussion over a simple image that hasn't even reoccurred yet. It seems fitting that there is theorization concerning Jessica because she has appeared in two videos, making it unlikely to be a random encounter. To me, even the white doll in The House is more outstanding than Skull.

Right now, it appears it was just a random, freaky image much like the sinking of the Arizona.


Actually, I agree with you there. There hasn't been any evidence supporting Skully as an important character, and I honestly think focus on him/her/it is distracting (much like the discussion about Jessica in the Entry #27-8 threads). Until we're given more to work with, there's really no point in lingering on the image.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?


Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 2578
Location: Cowtown, AB

Hmm, you do have a point, though I feel that it's missing the spirit of the forum: everything here tends to be dwelt upon to a point that it's really too much, unless you're a newbie who hasn't been brought up to speed.

In terms of relevance to the rest of the series, I agree that it's not especially significant, though it holds a special importance in terms that that was definitely someone wearing a mask, and it was similar enough to the one we see attacking Jay that it could mean that that person (or someone like them) was causing Jay, or the person holding the camera, grief. It's more interesting than a bullet casing or a case of pills because it's potentially a character, not just a prop!

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:07 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
8bitFilk
Veteran


Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 145

Dray wrote:
As for him being calm, I think that may just be in comparison to Amy's panic. He doesn't seem especially calm, just as though he is doing the best he can to handle a hazardous situation.


Okay, I'm with you on that. I didn't mean to suggest anything sinister on Alex's part here; more that he seems somewhat familiar with what is happening. I got the impression that his reaction was that of someone who recognises a serious and immediate threat, but also has the knowledge and self-control to react intelligently.
As you said, this could have been in comparison to Amy's panic. Maybe it was because of Amy's panic: he's put his own fear to one side and is concentrating on getting her out of harm's way, maybe?
Either way, it was controlled; not just a knee-jerk "fight-or-flight" response.

As for Skully, I think it probably is significant, but there's nothing really to deduce from the single brief glimpse of it we've had so far. For the moment I think it's enough that we're aware of it.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DandA
Decorated


Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Posts: 275

8bitFilk wrote:
Dray wrote:
As for him being calm, I think that may just be in comparison to Amy's panic. He doesn't seem especially calm, just as though he is doing the best he can to handle a hazardous situation.


Okay, I'm with you on that. I didn't mean to suggest anything sinister on Alex's part here; more that he seems somewhat familiar with what is happening. I got the impression that his reaction was that of someone who recognises a serious and immediate threat, but also has the knowledge and self-control to react intelligently.
As you said, this could have been in comparison to Amy's panic. Maybe it was because of Amy's panic: he's put his own fear to one side and is concentrating on getting her out of harm's way, maybe?
Either way, it was controlled; not just a knee-jerk "fight-or-flight" response.

As for Skully, I think it probably is significant, but there's nothing really to deduce from the single brief glimpse of it we've had so far. For the moment I think it's enough that we're aware of it.


I agree that Alex seemed kinda calm. But there could be a lot of different reasons why he came off that way, Alex could just be not that great of actor.

As for Skully, I'm holding judgement just because we have nothing to go on. The distortion was weird enough that I for one couldn't make heads or tales what or where that shot was from. Though I always assumed that Skully was peeking through a tube thing in the quantum basement. That being said, there was a lot of unexplained weird stuff in that video, like the person going down the hall, I just assumed Skully was part of it.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:47 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
poisonmolasses
Boot


Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 30
Location: Georgia, USA

A bit of Tetraphobia?

Hey y'all... new poster so bear with me.

I've made a remedial search for this topic and haven't found it to be brought up before, but if it has I apologise in advance. One thing I've noticed about this entry was the repeated use of the number four. As in, 4/4/10, Slender shows up at 4:04, etc. In many Asian cultures, a fear-level beyond that which we Americans attribute to the number 13 is awarded to the number 4. Apparently the word for death in Korean, Japanese, etc. is a homophone for the number 4. Notice also the day-of-the-deadish mask employed later in the entry.

What this says to me, folks, is that Alex is dead.

I'll keep looking out for more tetraphobic references. In the meantime, check out the following image and see if anything looks familiar to you...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Evolution4glyph.png

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
carameldrops
Veteran


Joined: 22 Dec 2010
Posts: 79

I was creeped out by all the 4's as soon as I saw the timestamp! Whether or not that means Alex is dead, though, I'm not sure. If he's dead, who do you think sent the tape? TTA possibly?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheBioGuy
Unfettered


Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Posts: 332
Location: Nebraska!

Re: A bit of Tetraphobia?

poisonmolasses wrote:
Hey y'all... new poster so bear with me.

I've made a remedial search for this topic and haven't found it to be brought up before, but if it has I apologise in advance. One thing I've noticed about this entry was the repeated use of the number four. As in, 4/4/10, Slender shows up at 4:04, etc. In many Asian cultures, a fear-level beyond that which we Americans attribute to the number 13 is awarded to the number 4. Apparently the word for death in Korean, Japanese, etc. is a homophone for the number 4. Notice also the day-of-the-deadish mask employed later in the entry.

What this says to me, folks, is that Alex is dead.

I'll keep looking out for more tetraphobic references. In the meantime, check out the following image and see if anything looks familiar to you...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Evolution4glyph.png


Sorry I'm a fail, but which one is supposed to look familiar? And I don't think they'd kill a main character that casually. I think that it more points to the frightening evil presence of the Operator. Just my two cents.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:46 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
amrith777
Entrenched


Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 921
Location: North Carolina

First post--Discovered this 'arg' a few weeks ago and have watched every entry and read hundreds of posts both here and at SA.I have not seen this mentioned before,so I thought I'd point it out.
On entry #26 at exactly 3:45,Alex says "WE"...as in the whole sentence being "when WE moved" referring to he and she.My question is,assuming he meant HE and SHE,is when did this move take place and furthermore,what does that say about THEIR timeline and when they met and how long they've been involved?
Perhaps the actors/writers made a script mistake and overlooked this pronoun but it seems like a HUGE deal and I'm actually stunned that with all the minutiae discussed in this forum,that no one caught that. Shocked
Thoughts?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Playmer
Veteran

Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 83

amrith777 wrote:
First post--Discovered this 'arg' a few weeks ago and have watched every entry and read hundreds of posts both here and at SA.I have not seen this mentioned before,so I thought I'd point it out.
On entry #26 at exactly 3:45,Alex says "WE"...as in the whole sentence being "when WE moved" referring to he and she.My question is,assuming he meant HE and SHE,is when did this move take place and furthermore,what does that say about THEIR timeline and when they met and how long they've been involved?
Perhaps the actors/writers made a script mistake and overlooked this pronoun but it seems like a HUGE deal and I'm actually stunned that with all the minutiae discussed in this forum,that no one caught that. Shocked
Thoughts?


As far as we know, Alex moved alone (possibly with his dog) to whereever he moved to about 3 years ago, probably actually nearer to 4 at the time the video in 26 was shot. That's plenty of time, in fact it's a lot of time to become involved with a potential suitor, and move in together, and hell move once or twice.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:50 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
amrith777
Entrenched


Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 921
Location: North Carolina

Playmer wrote:
amrith777 wrote:
First post--Discovered this 'arg' a few weeks ago and have watched every entry and read hundreds of posts both here and at SA.I have not seen this mentioned before,so I thought I'd point it out.
On entry #26 at exactly 3:45,Alex says "WE"...as in the whole sentence being "when WE moved" referring to he and she.My question is,assuming he meant HE and SHE,is when did this move take place and furthermore,what does that say about THEIR timeline and when they met and how long they've been involved?
Perhaps the actors/writers made a script mistake and overlooked this pronoun but it seems like a HUGE deal and I'm actually stunned that with all the minutiae discussed in this forum,that no one caught that. Shocked
Thoughts?


As far as we know, Alex moved alone (possibly with his dog) to whereever he moved to about 3 years ago, probably actually nearer to 4 at the time the video in 26 was shot. That's plenty of time, in fact it's a lot of time to become involved with a potential suitor, and move in together, and hell move once or twice.


That's a very good point.I was aware of the time passed in the back of my mind--it just seemed significant at the time that he said "We..." as opposed to "I..." referring (in MY mind) to when he originally took off on his own to escape Slendy,etc al.But now that you mention it--3-4 years IS plenty of time for him to have become involved and move several times.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 34 of 35 [518 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 32, 33, 34, 35  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group