Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:06 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: MetaCortechs » MetaCortechs: General/Updates
[OFF TOPIC] Literature, Philosophy, etc.
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 3 [42 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
Omnie
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 772

Re: Found Something!

Semioclast wrote:
Ther are a few other interesting articles about the topic.


Ha ha ha! Also, ha! You spelled "there" incorrectly. And you call yourself a writing instructor? Ha!

Mr. Green

[Edit] Also, "stumbled" rather than "stumbeld."
Mr. GreenMr. GreenMr. Green

Would you like to argue with my participle usage now? Huh? Cool

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 2:53 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Semioclast
Boot

Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 68

Okay, okay. You got me. That's what I get for posting with my eyes closed.

Just to get the record straight: NO ONE DANGLED A PARTICIPLE! I never thought that my self depricating joke about being anal would be taken to heart. It was just meant as a humorous salutation, not a critique.

Again, everyone gets mighty touchy when there are no new updates. Very Happy
_________________
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." --Umberto Eco

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:18 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Omnie
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 772

Semioclast wrote:
Okay, okay. You got me. That's what I get for posting with my eyes closed.

Just to get the record straight: NO ONE DANGLED A PARTICIPLE! I never thought that my self depricating joke about being anal would be taken to heart. It was just meant as a humorous salutation, not a critique.

Again, everyone gets mighty touchy when there are no new updates. Very Happy


Oh, ha...you could have said that before I spent all day trying to figure out how exactly one goes about dangling a participle. Mr. Green Heh, don't worry, nothing was taken to heart. I was kidding, I just stayed up way too late yesterday and I get weird when I'm sleep deprived. Well, actually, I'm always sleep deprived, but I guess it's a matter of degree...go past a certain point and everything starts looking funny.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:36 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
el kabong
Boot

Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 38

The chick who wrote that article, Jane McGonigal, is pretty amazing. That article is how I found out about ARGs in the first place.

Here are some of my thoughts:

What is literature but way of parsing life and what is life but a hugely complex system? As manufactured systems become more and more complex, the people who explain or parse those systems become the new writers and create the new narratives. Technical documents, once dry and one dimensional, now must become dynamic, robust, intuitive and narrative-driven in order to adequately explain technology that is becoming more self-sufficient. This further blurs the line between reality and simulation. To enjoy an explanation of an actual system being used in the real world for it's narrative qualities is to enter new territory. The New Narrative of the '50s and '60s incorporated the authors' experience, breaking down the fourth wall. The New Narrative of the new millennium will incorporate different media, including (or especially) media previously excluded from "entertainment." For instance, marketing campaigns are slowly becoming more interesting than the products they market. Case in point: the movie A.I. sucked hard, but the ingenious game constructed out of websites and phone messages that grew out of the movie was fascinating and groundbreaking. So too, was the marketing campaign behind the movie The Blair Witch Project, which had the added benefit of being a good movie in and of itself.

(Note: this phenomenon is not all that new. For years, people have actually looked forward to seeing the new commercials aired during the Super Bowl. However, these new developments make quantum leaps in the complexity and profundity of this media.)

It makes perfect sense that this new narrative will unfold primarily on the Internet. Storytelling has evolved from oral and written traditions to digital. Stories no longer need to be constrained to the page. The innovations of non-linear masters such as Borges are coming to fruition on the Internet, where stories can involve corporate Web sites, blogs, discussion forums, trains schedules, anything the creator can think of to enhance the story. And even more profound is the infinite ways in which these stories can be experienced ("read" is too limiting a term). A person can enter into these narratives from a variety of points and the path one chooses is almost certain to be unique to that user (again, "reader" is too limiting). The classic analogy for this is the "Choose Your Own Adventure" stories written in the '70s. These books were hugely influential to the generation growing up then and it is no coincidence that it is this generation (and the ones immediately following it) that is responsible for creating this new, user-driven fiction.

The above is from a paper I'm writing about modern narratives. Anyway, all of this is too damn fascinating.

As for other places where the philosophy of the Matrix is being discussed, check out these:

www.corporatemofo.com/stories/051803matrix.htm

http://www.unomaha.edu/~wwwjrf/gnostic.htm

http://metaphilm.com/philm.php?id=169_0_2_0
(This one is amazing, connecting Godel's Incompleteness Theorum with the Matrix. The math is f.ucking complex, but it all makes sense!)

There are many more out there, full of brilliant people discussing a movie(s) that seems to grow in complexity and profundity every day. As a teacher, I've used the Matrix when discussing Oedipus and Plato. It works pefectly and the high school seniors I teach love it!

Cheers!

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Semioclast
Boot

Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 68

Wow!

El Kabong, that was quite the insightful post and a wealth of knowledge. I never thought of linking it to Borges, but then again I just started reading his work. I too, am thinking about possible paper or conference presentation ideas which incorporate this type of new narrative. Thanks for the tips. If you have any others please pass them on.

I would respond but I am drained. A whole day of seminars tends to send my mind reeling in to many directions to focus on an intelligent reply which would spark a discussion. Maybe later.

Thanks again, great post.
_________________
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." --Umberto Eco

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:54 pm
Last edited by Semioclast on Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:18 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
adagio
Boot

Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 26

el kabong wrote:
As manufactured systems become more and more complex, the people who explain or parse those systems become the new writers and create the new narratives. Technical documents, once dry and one dimensional, now must become dynamic, robust, intuitive and narrative-driven in order to adequately explain technology that is becoming more self-sufficient.


As a techwriter, I salute you! Technology has become so much more than a tool or an aide. It permeates our existence, and will continue to do so. Our world is dependent upon it now, for safety, for entertainment, for efficiency and for productivity. Those of us who think beyond the "how do make this (VCR, software, robot, blender) work?" type of mindset know that the questions, "What do I want it to do for me?" and "Should I really let technology do this for me?" are the questions that truly need answering.

Personally, I love technology. I doubt if I'll ever hit that wall, the one where I say "Stop. Don't do that for me.", in my lifetime. There's always a nagging doubt though; the tiny apprehension that it could all go terribly wrong.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Azathoth666
Unfettered

Joined: 09 Oct 2003
Posts: 321
Location: OZ-tralia

and if it does, before we know it we'll wind up living permanently unconscious in a pod, wired into a massive simulator program; just a tiny cog in a huge machine...

But until such time, gimme my bluetooth PDAs and portable DVD players!

Wink
_________________
We don't stop playing because we grow old.
We grow old because we stop playing.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
adagio
Boot

Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 26

Azathoth666 wrote:
and if it does, before we know it we'll wind up living permanently unconscious in a pod, wired into a massive simulator program; just a tiny cog in a huge machine...


Wink


Well, I don't know if I'm quite that paranoid. I don't expect my alarm clock to punch me back the next time I smack its sleep button, but I sometimes worry about losing our ability to be self sustaining. Would we be able to survive without our technology is we were suddenly deprived of it?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

heck no
they say smoking kills more americans a year than aids and all that stuff
but the number one killer of the average american is heart disease or failure
go figure
ill take my chances with the cigarettes
but the point is that most people DO NOT exercise i know how dorky it is to say that
but neither do i i mean i play soccer and surf but i enjoy it
everyone would die off and robots would enjoy human flesh
maybe they would turn us into cows
and robots would wear us!
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:43 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
FlanInTheFace
Boot

Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 54

I want the robot that eats me to have the strength of a gorilla with the strength of eight gorillas. It would only be 5 feet tall because that's as big as they come. Laughing

Yes, that was pointless.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:45 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
bakntime
Unfettered

Joined: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 462
Location: back in time

surfloser wrote:
heck no
they say smoking kills more americans a year than aids and all that stuff
but the number one killer of the average american is heart disease or failure
go figure
ill take my chances with the cigarettes


Yeah, but cigarettes highly increase your risk of heart problems...

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

it all depends on the persons lifestyle
take me for instance i can smoke like a chimney and never cough
ever
and i can hold my breath longer than anyone i know
but thats probly from holding in hits
ill take my surgen generals warning and run with it
way off topic
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:50 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Tobester
Veteran


Joined: 05 Oct 2003
Posts: 136

surfloser wrote:
it all depends on the persons lifestyle
take me for instance i can smoke like a chimney and never cough
ever
and i can hold my breath longer than anyone i know
but thats probly from holding in hits
ill take my surgen generals warning and run with it
way off topic


That is one hell of a poem! Mr. Green
_________________
Those of you who think you know everything are annoying to those of us who do.
- David Brent-


PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:50 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Semioclast
Boot

Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 68

adagio wrote:
Well, I don't know if I'm quite that paranoid. I don't expect my alarm clock to punch me back the next time I smack its sleep button, but I sometimes worry about losing our ability to be self sustaining. Would we be able to survive without our technology is we were suddenly deprived of it?


This just makes me think of all of the nonsense that went on around Y2K. Everyone went nuts because of a supposed "glitch" that would render our computer networks useless. If it is were that east to cripple society, wouldn't that be the best vector for an attack by non-organic sentient systems? Now, don't get me wrong. I am far from saying that I am paranoid about the machine taking over our humanity. I am far more concerned about the capitalist structures that control the machines destroying humanity.

Anyway, one has to consider how much humanity has already been lost by our reliance on machines. Could Hemingway have written his works using MS Word with the grammer check turned on? Hell, no. How much genuine human creativity (which is, arguably, the very marker of humanity) has been lost due to our reliance on such seemingly transparent manipulations of the ways in which we express our humanity?

AOL Instant Messenger and cellular text messaging are eating away at our grammar and sentence structure. They allow for the successful integration of such bastard neologisms as "L8R" into our lexicon. I am all for broadening the scope of linguistic richness but, come on. Such instances of the cultural erosion that technology may cause are striking and disturbing.

Technology as a tool for expression validates what it is, a tool. I feel that it is the point at which we forget that technology is a tool and begin using it as a substitute for originality and expression that is scary.

I'm just rambling. Anyone else have any opinions?
_________________
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." --Umberto Eco

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:08 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

see those silly pms dont need some stupid program to make up funny quotes they could just have someone a little more *special* than I~
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2003 10:42 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 3 [42 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: MetaCortechs » MetaCortechs: General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group