unforum

adrock · Boot Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 12 Location: Cincinnati OH

[CLUE?] StegDetect results from Emerson image files

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 3:36 am

_________________
Rock music @ www.eightfeet.com

ParityBit

Re: [CLUE?] StegDetect results from Emerson image files

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:27 am

anima · Boot Joined: 19 Oct 2003 Posts: 24 Location: bulgaria

Re: [CLUE?] StegDetect results from Emerson image files

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:42 am

ParityBit

Excellent, thanks for that (I should really pay more attention! Embarassed

)

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 10:17 am

Zimbu

Wowzers, I just had a thought... how many cds are there supposed to be, and have the packages been checked for invisible ink? UV writing, etc.

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 12:33 pm

_________________
EEC Directive: ARG's seriously harm you and others around you.

Zimbu

Oh, and Adrock, thanx for stegg testing those files. I suspected there was something going on. 20-3=17 missing files.

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 12:51 pm

_________________
EEC Directive: ARG's seriously harm you and others around you.

AnthraX101 · Entrenched Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 797

Using stegdetect v0.4 with default sensitivity none of those files are reporting anything.

I would take that with a grain of salt, such a high sensitivity will give you lots of false positives.

AnthraX101

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 12:58 pm

KaG

Someone should check the the cd for previous sessions. (The cd-writer programs usually shows the previous sessions if you choose to continue multisession disk)

If the cd is a multisession cd then there could be files which has been removed from the last session but still exists on the cd. Maybe there's a way to access them...

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 1:10 pm

adrock · Boot Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 12 Location: Cincinnati OH

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 1:25 pm

_________________
Rock music @ www.eightfeet.com

enaxor · I Have No Life Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Posts: 2395

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 1:40 pm

_________________
10/05/2007, 04/23/2009, 07/02/2015
The world is a much dimmer place.

heatha · Veteran Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 74

I work for a university and handle a lot of transcripts...another doument security feature sometimes involves images that become apparent when you photocopy, and also document security that shows up when you rub the sheet with a bit of bleach - changes colour to brown.

edit - diluted bleach usually works to bring up any chemical safety features in the paper.

**Posted:** Sun Nov 09, 2003 2:43 pm

Vargr

JPEG analysis ad nauseam

**Posted:** Sat Nov 15, 2003 5:43 pm

_________________
Vargr

Control can never be a means to any practical end. It can never be a means to anything but more control.
- William S. Burroughs

bakntime

Re: JPEG analysis ad nauseam

**Posted:** Sat Nov 15, 2003 5:51 pm

Flynn · Decorated Joined: 11 Nov 2003 Posts: 240 Location: UK

At the risk of exposing myself as a complete anal retentive...

[anorak mode]
The FFE0/FFE1 after the FFD8 start of image marker doesn't indicate anything untoward. FFE1 just indicates that the image is an exif jpeg, whereas FFE0 indicates jfif format. The extraneous bytes thing is interesting though - if I get a chance I'll have a look at the files in Winhex and see if I can find anything there.
[/anorak mode]

I seem to remember having a life, but I think I must have mislaid it somewhere!

**Posted:** Sat Nov 15, 2003 6:23 pm

joebrent

For those yanks confused by the term 'anorak', go here.

I had to google it.

**Posted:** Sat Nov 15, 2003 6:34 pm