Author
Message
returntosilence
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Dec 2010 Posts: 3
This may have been thought of before... My thoughts on Entry ###### So, in Entry ###### (the one where totheark "hacked" the account) it sounds like he's saying "I'm coming for you, and you will lead me to the ark" near the end.
It has already been discovered that ARK = Alex R Kralie.
And it is widely believed that Masky/totheark is Tim.
So my question is, is Tim looking for Alex? Why? And is he trying to help or hurt?
Feel free to delete this if it's already been discussed.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:30 pm
NoMoreGaems
Unfettered
Joined: 17 Sep 2010 Posts: 627
Quote:
It has already been discovered that ARK = Alex R Kralie.
Other way around, it has been confirmed that Alex Kralie's middle initial is not R. Alex might still be the Ark, or have some connection to the Ark, but if he is it's not because of his initials.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:30 pm
MarbleArk
Decorated
Joined: 23 Nov 2010 Posts: 275
NoMoreGaems wrote:
Quote:
It has already been discovered that ARK = Alex R Kralie.
Other way around, it has been confirmed that Alex Kralie's middle initial is not R. Alex might still be the Ark, or have some connection to the Ark, but if he is it's not because of his initials.
alex KRAlie?
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:49 pm
DandA
Decorated
Joined: 25 Oct 2010 Posts: 275
I think thats a bit of a stretch..... and kinda too cutesy for MH. I think that they've given us no indication of what the ark could be. But for me to the ark sounds like a place. But who knows.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:55 pm
SticktheFigure
Unfettered
Joined: 15 Apr 2010 Posts: 549
I'm not gonna say anything to you about this. I fear what I may cause. The oldfags know what I'm talking about.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:45 pm
morscata12
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Sep 2009 Posts: 351
The ARK is almost definitely not Alex. Here's why:
- In the past, when Alex was in plain sight, TTA went sneaking around filming Jay (see Exit). We can assume that TTA had an interest in Jay when MH was being filmed.
- If he was stalking Jay then, and is stalking Jay now, we can assume that he's doing it for the same reason. Hence, that reason is not Alex (as Alex was readily available in the past).
A couple more points, though these are much more tenuous:
- Jay teleports while sleepwalking (Entry 24), made changes to the MH script that caused SM-like distortion (Entry 20), experienced similar symptoms as Tim (Entry 17), owns all the MH tapes (Entry 0), and was around Alex without showing signs of helping with production (Entry 13, etc). There is a significant possibility that Jay has some supernatural properties, which were of interest to Alex.
- If Jay does have some sort of subconscious supernatural properties, then totheark is definitely interested in those. This would take precedence over Jay's conscious properties (interest in finding Alex, ownership of the tapes, and general snoopy behavior).
FYI, make sure not to create new topics if there are other topics that hold the same theme. Don't be afraid to resurrect older threads if you've got something similar on your mind!
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:49 pm
returntosilence
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Dec 2010 Posts: 3
NoMoreGaems wrote:
Quote:
It has already been discovered that ARK = Alex R Kralie.
Other way around, it has been confirmed that Alex Kralie's middle initial is not R. Alex might still be the Ark, or have some connection to the Ark, but if he is it's not because of his initials.
I see. I was not aware of that, I thought I'd seen somewhere that it was confirmed that those were his initials.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:55 pm
McWeird007
Decorated
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 200 Location: Hell
The ARK could be the boiler room house thing in entries #22 and #23
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:59 pm
JKatkina
Entrenched
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 825 Location: Calgary, AB
returntosilence wrote:
NoMoreGaems wrote:
Quote:
It has already been discovered that ARK = Alex R Kralie.
Other way around, it has been confirmed that Alex Kralie's middle initial is not R. Alex might still be the Ark, or have some connection to the Ark, but if he is it's not because of his initials.
I see. I was not aware of that, I thought I'd seen somewhere that it was confirmed that those were his initials.
And this, folks, is why it's important to read the previous speculation threads before posting. Or at least the wiki! Anything, really! The "Alex R. Kraile" thing ends up being brought up like a freakin' revelation every time a batch of new folks shows up, and it's been discussed about a billion times. It wouldn't take much hunting.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:04 pm
equal_opposite
Troll
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 Posts: 270
Everybody give the new guy a hard time for harmlessly posting a thread, after gathering the courage to voice his speculations! Who gives a fuck if he's new to the site/MH/ARGS/ or perhaps even forums in general! Yeah! *chucks a rotten tomato* Post an old topic in my thread?! SUCK MY ASS!!! *chucks another tomato* Who cares if he even took the time to innocently state "feel free to delete if this has already been discussed"! Let's light the little son of a bitch on fire and feed him to the trout! Who cares if his timidity and lack familiarity with the forum are blatantly obvious! Fuck that guy right in his noob skull.
Not sarcastic.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:09 pm
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 2578 Location: Cowtown, AB
^_^ Yeah, I think that many people believe that Alex isn't the ark based upon his initials... though I can't remember where that was revealed, off the top of my head. In a tweet by Jay, I believe?
I think that another point for Alex not being the ark is because, as mentioned in ######, Jay is to lead the masked man to the ark; however, it's been speculated that the tape left at Alex's place in #26 was a plant. Again, this isn't a solid fact, but it could help to illustrate that the masked man is aware of Alex's location and chose to draw him back into conflict with the Operator, which doesn't seem to add up with Alex being an ark-like destination.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:25 pm
JKatkina
Entrenched
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 825 Location: Calgary, AB
I apologize if my admonishin was full of jackassery. I was less annoyed at this particular new poster (who is quite polite, and admittedly was taken in by a theory that would be convincing if it hadn't been so well disproved), but rather by all the new posters in general who aren't reading a thing before posting. Nonetheless, I suppose I shouldn't let frustration get the better of me!
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:32 pm
fullroundaction
Veteran
Joined: 28 Nov 2010 Posts: 115 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Don't apologize. He started a thread claiming things to be true that are well established to be false. Shun!
Shuuuuuuuuuun.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:37 pm
JKatkina
Entrenched
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 825 Location: Calgary, AB
Too true, too true. However, I may have been kind of a dick in the particular way I brought it up, which does matter!
With time, ignorant newbies can become well-informed oldbies, after all, but only if they feel welcome enough to stick around.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:39 pm
fullroundaction
Veteran
Joined: 28 Nov 2010 Posts: 115 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Hug.
Huuuuuuuuug.
/bipolar
And going crazy waiting die the new entry.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:41 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending