Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 15, 2024 5:31 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
(OT) The Operator vs Slenderman
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 4 of 5 [65 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
Author Message
TheMusicalVito
Boot

Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 19

What. The Operator is Slenderman.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
OffsetServbot
Boot


Joined: 05 Aug 2011
Posts: 62
Location: Wouldn't YOU like to know!!!!

TheMusicalVito wrote:
What. The Operator is Slenderman.


Not once in the series has that ever been confirmed. so it's not entiely a true statement.
_________________
DONT TOUCH ME THERE!.... Your hands are cold.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:24 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
redherring
Unfettered


Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 469
Location: NJ

Okay, so let's try to turn down the heat here.
(Edit: This first line sounded a lot ruder before, so I decided to change it.)

1) The Slender Man was a creature created by Victor Surge on Something Awful. It had a number of different traits, and at some points had facial features and a mouth. Sometimes it had extra limbs/tentacles, other times it did not. It did something to young children, and also caused fires (allegedly). It had a number of iterations. It was organic.

2) During this period of organic creation of The Slender Man, Troy thought 'hey this would be a cool type of thing to make a web series around' and did so. Him and Joseph picked the traits of The Slender Man that made most sense in the scope of their series. At first, this was: no face, the suit, creepin' on peeps.

3) As the series went on, Troy and Joseph evolved the character. It moved fast, appeared and disappeared. It caused audio-visual distortion. It had some sort of proxy in TTA. It had a name given by TTA - the Operator. They decided this would be the name of their iteration of The Slender Man in the universe they created.

4) Troy and Joseph have pointed out that they keep their series isolated. They don't intend to do crossovers or side stories. Then a number of other blogs and video series start coming up, with iterations of The Slender Man that have different traits, some that MH used, some that they took from the Victor Surge / SA origins, and some they made up themselves.

5) Now, two seasons and almost 50 entries into the series, the Operator is an icon of the Slender Man mythos. If you want to be literal within the universe, the Operator is the Operator and nothing more. The Operator existed before the SA forums made mention of The Slender Man. We can assume most of the articles and mythos of SA are moot, since by the time most of that came out, Troy and Joseph were already coming up with their own ideas for The Operator.

5b) That said, in the real world, where we all exist, The Slender Man was a mythos/meme created before MH existed. When we look at the total scope of all the vlogs and blogs created based on this mythos, all of the creatures (no matter what you call them - Der Grossman, Slenderman, The Slender Man, the Operator, Slim, whatever) are iterations of the Slender Man creature. They are their own creatures in their universes, and inside them are only The Slender Man if the creators decided a) to give them that name or b) assume that the mythos is part of their universe, no matter what they call him.

Obviously you can all argue 5 and 5b, and I guess that's fine, but it's semantics at that point, and if that's the only argument you're going to make, then you're mostly just wasting your time and getting yourself irritated over nothing. I think what I am posting here is the most civil way to continue trying to focus on what the OP was trying to do: talk about some of the differences between a) the Operator (MH) and the Slender Man (overall mythos) and/or b) the Operator (MH) and other Slender Men (other vlogs/blogs).

Edit 2: I removed the tl;dr since its focus seemed to distract from the majority of what I said and focused on the last point I made.
_________________
http://ryan.lelache.net

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:38 pm
Last edited by redherring on Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
tijde
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 331

I see no problem with the direction this topic has gone, and I really don't understand why people are so aggravated by it. It's not like we've forked off into discussing Jessica's childhood or something. Chances are pretty good that if someone made a separate thread titled "Is The Operator Slenderman?", it'd get merged here. And for good reason: even if it's not precisely the response the OP was hoping for, the question is quite relevant to the subject at hand. Policing the thread seems unnecessary, especially since the argument has naturally died off quite a bit. Instead of complaining that the current discussion is lame, why not spend that energy writing the kind of post you want to see--an 'on-topic' one--instead?
_________________
I had a good reason! I had a hunch.

Av source (not me)


PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:19 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
riderpool
Boot


Joined: 01 Sep 2011
Posts: 33

my question is how would a SWAT team take on either the operator or slenderman? or even an ODST team?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
redherring
Unfettered


Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 469
Location: NJ

tijde wrote:
I see no problem with the direction this topic has gone, and I really don't understand why people are so aggravated by it. It's not like we've forked off into discussing Jessica's childhood or something. Chances are pretty good that if someone made a separate thread titled "Is The Operator Slenderman?", it'd get merged here. And for good reason: even if it's not precisely the response the OP was hoping for, the question is quite relevant to the subject at hand. Policing the thread seems unnecessary, especially since the argument has naturally died off quite a bit. Instead of complaining that the current discussion is lame, why not spend that energy writing the kind of post you want to see--an 'on-topic' one--instead?


I really hate putting tl;dr's anymore, never seems to get the point across. I'll just keep posting walls-of-text and if people don't read, that's their own fault. Razz

I'm not really policing this thread (I mean, I'm not a mod, I'm not locking this to prevent this conversation from happening or anything). I can't force you guys to stop arguing about this, I just think it's a waste of time to get irritated about semantics. I probably wouldn't have even posted if not reading the OP's irritation that this thread sort of missed the point of the discussion he was hoping to have, which was 'differences between The Operator in MH and the Slender Man at large' not 'when we discuss MH's Operator, how literal should we be about which universe we're discussing in, the real world or the MH-verse'. The latter argument hasn't died off, either - when I was reading the posts above mine on page four, people were still arguing about this point.

Also, I was making the same point you were back on page three, so I'm not sure why you're getting defensive about my post. I just added onto the end the bit about semantics because I think it's a stupid thing to argue over. In fact, I made sure to re-edit my post to make sure I didn't start off being snippy, since the point was to try to turn down the heat and stop being irritated. I guess that first line should've been in bold or something…? *shrug* Anyway, now that post went over so well...

riderpool wrote:
my question is how would a SWAT team take on either the operator or slenderman? or even an ODST team?


That's actually a question that really interests me. I've wondered, if we actually saw police or SWAT team members or FBI or SOMETHING in a series, how the hell would they fight a/the Slender Man? Considering its most prevalent traits in the series involve being impervious to physical assault (Evan + Bat in EMH, for instance), teleportation, and memory loss, would an attack like that work? Can you catch something that can change its placement in space/time at will? Can you kill something that might not have life/a soul to destroy? Would they even remember it happened after they came to the scene?

This might've been explored in one of the non-video blogs, but I'd love to see it handled in a video series. How would you explore their reaction(s) on-camera?

- - -

And since I was asked to go back to the root of the OP's discussion, I think one thing I'm getting more and more curious about is whether the child-stealing thing is actually only a Slender Man trait and not an Operator trait. Although MH has never really dealt with the child abduction thing (or the organ-tearing-out thing) there are hints of those traits in this series. For one, entry 37. That sort of points to some Slendabduction going on with Alex as a child. Same with Jessica, who recounts having dreams of being taken away as a little girl.

Also, on the organ-harvesting point, Alex in Entry 38 seems to focus pretty heavily on this whole thing about the young boy (again, children!) having his organs removed and spread around. If that's supposed to be canon and a part of the Operator's past, then we're really looking at some major connections here. Even if it wasn't him, it would 'explain' (IG) why those theories exist, because of this urban legend.
_________________
http://ryan.lelache.net

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:54 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
riderpool
Boot


Joined: 01 Sep 2011
Posts: 33

redherring wrote:
tijde wrote:
I see no problem with the direction this topic has gone, and I really don't understand why people are so aggravated by it. It's not like we've forked off into discussing Jessica's childhood or something. Chances are pretty good that if someone made a separate thread titled "Is The Operator Slenderman?", it'd get merged here. And for good reason: even if it's not precisely the response the OP was hoping for, the question is quite relevant to the subject at hand. Policing the thread seems unnecessary, especially since the argument has naturally died off quite a bit. Instead of complaining that the current discussion is lame, why not spend that energy writing the kind of post you want to see--an 'on-topic' one--instead?


I really hate putting tl;dr's anymore, never seems to get the point across. I'll just keep posting walls-of-text and if people don't read, that's their own fault. Razz

I'm not really policing this thread (I mean, I'm not a mod, I'm not locking this to prevent this conversation from happening or anything). I can't force you guys to stop arguing about this, I just think it's a waste of time to get irritated about semantics. I probably wouldn't have even posted if not reading the OP's irritation that this thread sort of missed the point of the discussion he was hoping to have, which was 'differences between The Operator in MH and the Slender Man at large' not 'when we discuss MH's Operator, how literal should we be about which universe we're discussing in, the real world or the MH-verse'. The latter argument hasn't died off, either - when I was reading the posts above mine on page four, people were still arguing about this point.

Also, I was making the same point you were back on page three, so I'm not sure why you're getting defensive about my post. I just added onto the end the bit about semantics because I think it's a stupid thing to argue over. In fact, I made sure to re-edit my post to make sure I didn't start off being snippy, since the point was to try to turn down the heat and stop being irritated. I guess that first line should've been in bold or something…? *shrug* Anyway, now that post went over so well...

riderpool wrote:
my question is how would a SWAT team take on either the operator or slenderman? or even an ODST team?


That's actually a question that really interests me. I've wondered, if we actually saw police or SWAT team members or FBI or SOMETHING in a series, how the hell would they fight a/the Slender Man? Considering its most prevalent traits in the series involve being impervious to physical assault (Evan + Bat in EMH, for instance), teleportation, and memory loss, would an attack like that work? Can you catch something that can change its placement in space/time at will? Can you kill something that might not have life/a soul to destroy? Would they even remember it happened after they came to the scene?

This might've been explored in one of the non-video blogs, but I'd love to see it handled in a video series. How would you explore their reaction(s) on-camera?

- - -

And since I was asked to go back to the root of the OP's discussion, I think one thing I'm getting more and more curious about is whether the child-stealing thing is actually only a Slender Man trait and not an Operator trait. Although MH has never really dealt with the child abduction thing (or the organ-tearing-out thing) there are hints of those traits in this series. For one, entry 37. That sort of points to some Slendabduction going on with Alex as a child. Same with Jessica, who recounts having dreams of being taken away as a little girl.

Also, on the organ-harvesting point, Alex in Entry 38 seems to focus pretty heavily on this whole thing about the young boy (again, children!) having his organs removed and spread around. If that's supposed to be canon and a part of the Operator's past, then we're really looking at some major connections here. Even if it wasn't him, it would 'explain' (IG) why those theories exist, because of this urban legend.


...so...would batman be able to fight him cause...well...batman.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:09 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
redherring
Unfettered


Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 469
Location: NJ

riderpool wrote:
...so...would batman be able to fight him cause...well...batman.


Dude... actually, a Slender Man villain character in the Batman universe would be kinda amazing (and not totally out of place, save some of the inter-dimensional stuff was played down). Shocked I LIKE THIS IDEA!
_________________
http://ryan.lelache.net

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:25 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
riderpool
Boot


Joined: 01 Sep 2011
Posts: 33

redherring wrote:
riderpool wrote:
...so...would batman be able to fight him cause...well...batman.


Dude... actually, a Slender Man villain character in the Batman universe would be kinda amazing (and not totally out of place, save some of the inter-dimensional stuff was played down). Shocked I LIKE THIS IDEA!


no i mean like the actual slenderman, i mean he fought dracula, aliens, predator, and even judge dredd. its not out of the realm of reality

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:32 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
redherring
Unfettered


Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 469
Location: NJ

riderpool wrote:
redherring wrote:
riderpool wrote:
...so...would batman be able to fight him cause...well...batman.


Dude... actually, a Slender Man villain character in the Batman universe would be kinda amazing (and not totally out of place, save some of the inter-dimensional stuff was played down). Shocked I LIKE THIS IDEA!


no i mean like the actual slenderman, i mean he fought dracula, aliens, predator, and even judge dredd. its not out of the realm of reality


Oh, I figured. You just inspired another idea in my head, so I Internet-vomited it out into the forum. Razz

Did Batman really fight Dracula and Predator though... seriously? O_o'' I need to read up on more of this, that sounds (horrible*) awesome.
_________________
http://ryan.lelache.net

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:36 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
WhyYouBawwing
Unfettered


Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 516

Well put on everything, redherring! I find it refreshing actually that in Mh they don't flatout link TO with his internet name or the internet at all. Also, I forgot all about the mention of organ-removal in 38, so now I'm eagerly anticipating some bags in trees in a future entry.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:42 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Dumbalias
Boot


Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 56

Re: (OT) The Operator vs Slenderman
Their defining differences

AngryDeepground wrote:
At this point we all can agree that The Operator is not Slenderman, even if it's based on slendy. So what can we can say are there big differences.

One of the biggest differences I've seen is Operator is he does not seen taking children, which is a huge trait of Slenderman. Also Operator has effects on technology which Slenderan does not. After all if Slenderman had no effect on technology, why do we have pictures of him.

All in all it would be helpful to know the differences. After all a lot of people assume Operator is Slenderman, which can affect their perception of MH's story.

P.S. To avoid confusion please Clarify which one your talking about. Cause if you say slendy and you meant operator we wouldn't know.


Well, I thought that The Operator was really just slendy with his tentacles out, but sometimes if he wants he can shoot out tentacles and lengthen his limbs.

Also, he was kind of around children in enttry 37 because Alex was what, 6? But then again that depends on the theory if you believe that The Operator was in that himself, or if he just fucked with the tape. And if you were being serious about the "why do we have pictures of slenderman" thing, I hope you know those are shooped, right? I think that the camera blur and whatnot is just to make the viewing experience more interesting. Because if you think about it, in the first entries, there was really no distortion at all.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:54 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
AngryDeepground
Entrenched

Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 764

Re: (OT) The Operator vs Slenderman
Their defining differences

Dumbalias wrote:
AngryDeepground wrote:
At this point we all can agree that The Operator is not Slenderman, even if it's based on slendy. So what can we can say are there big differences.

One of the biggest differences I've seen is Operator is he does not seen taking children, which is a huge trait of Slenderman. Also Operator has effects on technology which Slenderan does not. After all if Slenderman had no effect on technology, why do we have pictures of him.

All in all it would be helpful to know the differences. After all a lot of people assume Operator is Slenderman, which can affect their perception of MH's story.

P.S. To avoid confusion please Clarify which one your talking about. Cause if you say slendy and you meant operator we wouldn't know.


Well, I thought that The Operator was really just slendy with his tentacles out, but sometimes if he wants he can shoot out tentacles and lengthen his limbs.

Also, he was kind of around children in enttry 37 because Alex was what, 6? But then again that depends on the theory if you believe that The Operator was in that himself, or if he just fucked with the tape. And if you were being serious about the "why do we have pictures of slenderman" thing, I hope you know those are shooped, right? I think that the camera blur and whatnot is just to make the viewing experience more interesting. Because if you think about it, in the first entries, there was really no distortion at all.


I am aware those were photo shopped, this is all hypotheticals if slender man did exist, but he does not. I can see how that comment might make one assume I thought Slendy was real, but I do not.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tijde
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 331

redherring wrote:
tijde wrote:
I see no problem with the direction this topic has gone, and I really don't understand why people are so aggravated by it. It's not like we've forked off into discussing Jessica's childhood or something. Chances are pretty good that if someone made a separate thread titled "Is The Operator Slenderman?", it'd get merged here. And for good reason: even if it's not precisely the response the OP was hoping for, the question is quite relevant to the subject at hand. Policing the thread seems unnecessary, especially since the argument has naturally died off quite a bit. Instead of complaining that the current discussion is lame, why not spend that energy writing the kind of post you want to see--an 'on-topic' one--instead?


I really hate putting tl;dr's anymore, never seems to get the point across.  I'll just keep posting walls-of-text and if people don't read, that's their own fault.  Razz

I'm not really policing this thread (I mean, I'm not a mod, I'm not locking this to prevent this conversation from happening or anything).  I can't force you guys to stop arguing about this, I just think it's a waste of time to get irritated about semantics.  I probably wouldn't have even posted if not reading the OP's irritation that this thread sort of missed the point of the discussion he was hoping to have, which was 'differences between The Operator in MH and the Slender Man at large' not 'when we discuss MH's Operator, how literal should we be about which universe we're discussing in, the real world or the MH-verse'.  The latter argument hasn't died off, either - when I was reading the posts above mine on page four, people were still arguing about this point.

Also, I was making the same point you were back on page three, so I'm not sure why you're getting defensive about my post.  I just added onto the end the bit about semantics because I think it's a stupid thing to argue over.  In fact, I made sure to re-edit my post to make sure I didn't start off being snippy, since the point was to try to turn down the heat and stop being irritated.  I guess that first line should've been in bold or something…?  *shrug*  Anyway, now that post went over so well...
 

I read and understood your tl;dr, and I recognized that we were making the same point. The point of my reply was that it seems counterproductive to say arguing about semantics is lame right after doing the same thing. It kind of comes off as "Here's the last word," which is silly to do in an open thread if you're trying to play defuser/mediator, IMO. And really, even if some find semantics lame, that doesn't mean everyone does (obviously). As someone said earlier, the OP started with an assumption that not everyone holds to be true. Makes sense that they'd say so here. 

My "policing the thread" remark wasn't solely directed at you. If I came off defensive, I apologize. I've already said what I wanted to say on the "Is The Operator Slenderman?" subject, so at this point I don't feel I have a horse in that race. (And for the record, I've begun rereading the SA thread to find more differences, as the OP has asked for, but I've yet to find any that haven't been mentioned already.) I'm just concerned that by restricting the conversation, we could be missing out on hearing some insightful opinions on the wider topic--especially since many seem to be interested in it, and a separate "Is the Operator Slenderman?" thread might be considered redundant. It seems to me that if the OP doesn't want both topics discussed here, the wiser course of action might be approaching a mod about splitting it, rather than leaving grumpy replies about it. If a mod says no, then ok, let this topic take its natural course.     

Tl;dr: There's room for OP's "defining differences" and the more semantic "are there differences?" within one thread. They're rather linked topics, and the board seems to favor the neatness of longer, broader threads over smaller, specific ones. Just my observations; maybe I'm wrong, and if so, I'd welcome correction from a mod.
_________________
I had a good reason! I had a hunch.

Av source (not me)


PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
riderpool
Boot


Joined: 01 Sep 2011
Posts: 33

redherring wrote:
riderpool wrote:
redherring wrote:
riderpool wrote:
...so...would batman be able to fight him cause...well...batman.


Dude... actually, a Slender Man villain character in the Batman universe would be kinda amazing (and not totally out of place, save some of the inter-dimensional stuff was played down). Shocked I LIKE THIS IDEA!


no i mean like the actual slenderman, i mean he fought dracula, aliens, predator, and even judge dredd. its not out of the realm of reality


Oh, I figured. You just inspired another idea in my head, so I Internet-vomited it out into the forum. Razz

Did Batman really fight Dracula and Predator though... seriously? O_o'' I need to read up on more of this, that sounds (horrible*) awesome.


yeah he fought dracula in a DTV and the predator was in a comic and fan film

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:39 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 4 of 5 [65 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group