unforum

Teedub

Pravado's posts makes me question why I continue to lurk this forum a lot. I mean, he is such a BUZZKILL... I thought it was awesome to watch what felt like another solo-Alex MH tape. I feel like most of the fanbase probably enjoyed this one due to the season 1 feel behind it.

Can't people save their arguing or criticism for another thread? Go to the "RAGE" or "Entry quality" threads if you really want to complain. It really ruins the threads that are made for the actual entries. The negative-post clutter is really annoying.

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:53 am

onetruepurple · Unfettered Joined: 07 Jan 2011 Posts: 570

I liked this entry, but I can see why Pravado doesn't.

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:06 am

Hazman

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:20 am

Magyk

Another entry, another thread with people bitching about Pravado having his own opinion. Confused

I enjoyed this entry, liked the classic Season 1 feel to it.

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:37 am

Oransel · Boot Joined: 18 Jul 2012 Posts: 69

This was a good entry. We have found out more insight into Alex actions and the picture is getting more and more clear.

Note that timeline will never be complete or absolutely accurate because of Alex and Jay editing, burning tapes or just plain unreleasing most of the tapes. Even with tentative timeline which is accurate for the most part, it has a lot of problems with original MH 2006 events. #54, #2, #12 and #54 are especially problematic. My personal timeline is little different from tentative one:

Tekyro · Boot Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 26 Location: Scotland

To those talking about the "double operator":

It's just the way the white blob (which I assume is from lens flare) moves with the camera until it's above a black space between trees. See here.

Frame by frame .gif of how I see it happening

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:21 am

Alfons Grass · Greenhorn Joined: 05 Apr 2013 Posts: 4

Alex protecting Amy

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:46 am

Beidah

Re: Alex protecting Amy

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:29 am

Ligonater · Kilroy Joined: 04 May 2011 Posts: 2

It is not surprising that Alex knew Amy before all this happened. From what we gather he was living with her at the time she found the camera. If there were to have just met their relationship would have moved along pretty quickly to get to the point of having a house together. (not that it isn't possible, just less likely)

I don't think there is much meaning we can really pull from Alex lying to Amy other than he never told her about the Operator. (which again is obvious based on her reaction when it showed up at her house) It isn't really out of character for Alex to not tell his girlfriend he is wondering around the woods at night. Sometime guys just like to freedom to not explain everything and cause girlfriends to worry.

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:30 am

evanx275h

I really hate coming to the forums to see that there's a new (good, at that) Entry, some great discussion with both positive and negative (respectable, mind you) feedback, you know, like adults, and a few pages in I see this bullshit:

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:31 am

_________________
Creator of Stan Frederick. I also make other cool stuff you should watch.

Sha Noran · Entrenched Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Posts: 919

I've been following MH for some time but finally felt like registering here to participate. Hi!

I specifically wanted to post rebutting the line of thinking asking why Jay never did a google search about a faceless man in a suit; actually, I do believe that the premise of the whole series started with Jay reading about Slendy on SomethingAwful and being reminded of the tapes. He's obviously aware of the Operator. I think they don't talk about him because they haven't got anything to say that isn't apparent visually in the entries, and he's an absolutely terrifying entity that would naturally be something you'd rather not talk about... Or think about.

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:52 am

TheOperator

Re: Alex protecting Amy

desrevnoc · Boot Joined: 15 Oct 2012 Posts: 22

pravado's posts don't seem that evil to me, it's usually the posts complaining about them that are annoying Razz

. I usually just like his perspective on the story.

'They're all gone' from Entry #22 didn't include Amy, so it seems Alex wasn't aware of her being nearby (even if she was). The main motivations for burning this one seem to be protecting Amy and/or covering his tracks.

Like a few others in the thread, the connection between Tim and Amy did make me more aware of the possibility that Amy is tta affiliated ever since some stuff in her childhood. This isn't really founded on much, except that from a writer's point of view it might be appealing to shine a different light on previous hoody-alex encounters - 'why are you smiling?'.

Speculative rambling ahead
In something like this were the case, I could see how he mentioned the strange man in the past and was met with strange reactions and concern - prompting him to lie this entry. Mentioning static interference, wanting to move and a person from her past that suggests abandoned locations would really ease her mind in that scenario Razz

. Might even incentivise to investigate.

The 'Do you remember me' from an early tta stalking video seemed to be directed at Jay though. If he had some meaningful connection with her without Alex even knowing she was even there that probably hints at another investigation Jay did before losing memories.

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:54 am

Little_Socrates · Boot Joined: 02 Aug 2012 Posts: 30

Re: Alex protecting Amy

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:39 am

paladin181 · Unfettered Joined: 14 Nov 2011 Posts: 502

**Posted:** Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:00 am