unforum

TheJoker

Well, it was implied that time might pass differently in the Dark World we saw, considering the very slowly decomposing corpse of Bruce. Who knows how long she's been there from her perspective?

I don't think anyone thought she was going to have escaped and returned to a normal life, and she probably won't be unharmed if we see her again. But maybe she could still be saved, on some level.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:31 pm

geekgirlinthefedora · Decorated Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 283

**Posted:** Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:13 pm

TheJoker

Oh, I see. I didn't consider his entire trip to be in the Slendyverse- I saw it as him getting warped through time and space within Rosswood specifically for the most part, and it was the weird dark place with the concrete ground where he found Bruce's surprisingly fresh corpse that I assumed to be the alternate dimension. And, as I said, it wasn't as decomposed as it should have been for someone who died around two years earlier (49 was chronologically in fall 2010, and 65 in October 2012.)

**Posted:** Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:56 pm

Serum · Guest

**Posted:** Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:48 am

Sha Noran · Entrenched Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Posts: 919

**Posted:** Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:05 am

Ztakk · Entrenched Joined: 09 Jan 2013 Posts: 868

On the fence here, but I'm leaning towards alive. It doesn't make much sense to me for her to be dead since she was suddenly a big thing, and became a major plot point, then seemingly dropped out of the series, only to be put right back in. With her being dead, it gets rid of Jay's driving force and kind of adds a "ok now what do we do" feel to the series, and not in a good way.

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:51 am

CraicIsMighty · Unfettered Joined: 03 Aug 2011 Posts: 497

If Jessica really is dead then I sort of have to question why they even put her into the series in the first place. She didn't really do much or even contribute to the plot that heavily. She'd just seem sort of unnecessary if she was dead, Amy can already cover the "missing girl we need to find" angle.

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:15 pm

Marble Hornets · Entrenched Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Posts: 946

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:18 pm

hachiman · Unfettered Joined: 19 Oct 2012 Posts: 359

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:39 pm

TheJoker

...No? I'm pretty sure he's not. Or... wait... is he? Shocked

Side note, I don't think you guys understand the concept of what trolling means. Forgetting a specific visual detail from a particular entry isn't usually something I'd assume to be trolling, it's pretty poorly done if it is.

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:13 pm

Hazman

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:17 pm

Marble Hornets · Entrenched Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Posts: 946

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:24 pm

TheJoker

No, I understood perfectly, and I'm saying that you're being stupid. Not remembering what the corpse in 65 looked like is nowhere near the level of stupid which should be getting anyone riled up. It's a little stupid not to have realized it was Bruce, but seriously? If it was a troll attempt, then I don't know what's more disturbing, the fact that that's the best he could come up with, or the fact that it seems to have worked.

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:46 pm

Marble Hornets · Entrenched Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Posts: 946

*sigh*

He pretty clearly stated what he thought was true. We are reverse trolling him. The idea that he would be trolling is supposed to rile him up because he would then think that we think he's dumb enough to believe what he thinks to be true. Ironically enough you tried telling people they don't know what trolling really is, and seemingly ended up getting trolled harder than any of us (given your reaction), even though nobody was attempting to troll you.

That gave me a good laugh. Point is, in this instance he's factually wrong.

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:55 pm

TheJoker

...That post melted my brain. I don't think you could have made that more confusing if you tried.

**Posted:** Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:48 pm