Author
Message
kira1000
Decorated
Joined: 29 May 2013 Posts: 255
mrshomersimpson wrote:
Just to clarify
MOPAIN KNOW!
lol Ive told them ( i think kira did too?), they know everything about the hex and the files and the flights
From some of the messages I recieved from sandy and mopain i dont think jean is still alive!. (If shes not dead i would find it a tad unbelievable and a tad inconsistant)
I fail to see a point in us trying in vain to contact jean when shes already been taken care of!
We might as well just all wait for the groundsman to come back and see what he says..
I would not be so sure, the hacker and Jeab Baker may in fact be two different people and the hacker used Jean Baker's account/name in order to try and hide the fact that the MoP had been hacked AGAIN (has happened several times before apparently). I think it may be a good idea to keep on trying or at least try and gain access to the flight document to confirm that she is indeed deceased.
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 5:37 pm
mrshomersimpson
Entrenched
Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Posts: 998 Location: scotland
kira1000 wrote:
mrshomersimpson wrote:
Just to clarify
MOPAIN KNOW!
lol Ive told them ( i think kira did too?), they know everything about the hex and the files and the flights
From some of the messages I recieved from sandy and mopain i dont think jean is still alive!. (If shes not dead i would find it a tad unbelievable and a tad inconsistant)
I fail to see a point in us trying in vain to contact jean when shes already been taken care of!
We might as well just all wait for the groundsman to come back and see what he says..
I would not be so sure, the hacker and Jeab Baker may in fact be two different people and the hacker used Jean Baker's account/name in order to try and hide the fact that the MoP had been hacked AGAIN (has happened several times before apparently). I think it may be a good idea to keep on trying or at least try and gain access to the flight document to confirm that she is indeed deceased.
Well...
assuming you got much the same communication as me since you were the other snitch then i'm going to guess you should know what happened to jean no?..
The communication i have had with mopain and sandy would certainly suggest she has been "taken care of"
also if it was someone else using jean bakers account then it wouldnt make sense them telling us to try and contact her because well if they hacked jeans account to send it then they dont want to be caught so we cant exactly try and get in touch with someone we dont know...
I dont see much point in over complicating it however, i think we just wait for the groundsman to come back - see where they go with it. I think imo jean has been taken care of usually that means killed where im from so im guessing shes dead.
I think if it came back as anything else id be pretty surprised from a pm point of view as that would start twisting things i guess and make things seem overcomplicated...
Perhaps there is more info to gain from perhaps investigating the crash ect... but again i dont see what we can do other than wait for the groundsman.
_________________Has the unique "jumping in with 2 feet first and asking all the random awkward questions everyone's thinking but not asking so i do" policy......
"Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. So said by the idiot who can't understand it."
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:24 am
duke9509
Entrenched
Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Posts: 812
OOC, would the people who've been playing this the longest say what mission number/item they're at for cr0n? I just want to figure out when I leave "automated catch-up mode" and join the real-time happenings.
I just got a new item for 1: Dry Ice -- Police Interview. Is that where everyone else is?
_________________Actively playing: iDGi, Project Repertum
Played: Writing on the Moon
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:50 pm
mrshomersimpson
Entrenched
Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Posts: 998 Location: scotland
duke9509 wrote:
OOC, would the people who've been playing this the longest say what mission number/item they're at for cr0n? I just want to figure out when I leave "automated catch-up mode" and join the real-time happenings.
I just got a new item for 1: Dry Ice -- Police Interview. Is that where everyone else is?
yeah that's where i am, that's where im also currently pulling my hair out!
you are up to date.
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:01 pm
fernandocarulli
Decorated
Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 183
hmmm ... pretty hard i think ...
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
I think content of video and transcript of the interview is the same, no idea bout that french call ... is that peter blythe guy the same? looks kinda different on the photo for me
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 3:15 pm
mrshomersimpson
Entrenched
Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Posts: 998 Location: scotland
fernandocarulli wrote:
hmmm ... pretty hard i think ...
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
I think content of video and transcript of the interview is the same, no idea bout that french call ... is that peter blythe guy the same? looks kinda different on the photo for me
I am pulling out my hair over this.... so glad im not the only one.
The guy looks totally different yeah! but i submitted that and they said it was wrong... WRONG?! REALLY?!
its just starting to break my head now, i even overlayed the audio to the video NADDA.
This is the first time in a long time i have actually felt like pulling my hair out over something. Its clearly something thats staring me right in the face!
And that poor detective doing the interview - he looks like hes been beaten to a pulp. Properly done over.
also see screenshot attatched
IF the voicemail was left on the 5th then how can it have been transcribed on the 4th OR left on the 3rd!! as stated...I have tried to submit all this and its just wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Description
Filesize
317.94KB
Viewed
53 Time(s)
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 3:26 pm
Elethamei
Unfettered
Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Posts: 448 Location: Finland
Gah, I came here wishing someone had solved this, but apparently not I also wondered about the dates, but those aren't it
Edit: Oh my god, I got it right!
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
It is a different dude in the interview than in the photo. You have to choose Peter's profile and the contents of the video.
_________________
@elethamei
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 3:41 pm
Last edited by Elethamei on Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
fernandocarulli
Decorated
Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 183
the call was received at the 3th and the transcript made at the 4th, so thats ok i think
forget it my mistake
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:03 pm
mrshomersimpson
Entrenched
Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Posts: 998 Location: scotland
Elethamei wrote:
Gah, I came here wishing someone had solved this, but apparently not I also wondered about the dates, but those aren't it
Edit: Oh my god, I got it right!
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
It is a different dude in the interview than in the photo. You have to choose Peter's profile and the contents of the video.
i swear i did that like a million times and they kept saying it was wrong!
so selective crOn.... There were multiple things that could have been wrong with that doccument there.
Just to show how annoyed i was with the whole thing there i called him elderly, then i called him 35+ then i called him his correct age.. sooo annoyed with that there i even said in the post above the screenshot that it was a different guy and i pointed it out and they said it was wrong....
throws computer out the window...
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:08 pm
fernandocarulli
Decorated
Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 183
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Oh my god, I got it right! It is a different dude in the interview than in the photo. You have to choose Peter's profile and the contents of the video.
jeez ... great!!
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:16 pm
Elethamei
Unfettered
Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Posts: 448 Location: Finland
I feel you Angela. It gets absolutely frustrating sometimes.
_________________
@elethamei
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:20 pm
mrshomersimpson
Entrenched
Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Posts: 998 Location: scotland
Elethamei wrote:
I feel you Angela. It gets absolutely frustrating sometimes.
Thanks Elethamei (( hugs))
The best bit of it is that one of the mopdef forms today was really annoying me - the number of items in the agreement and the number of items shipped was different
Assuming that obviously they would be the same if they agreed on a number of items but no apparently not!? that's a thing?! really?!
I mailed about it and they said follow the arrows... i think if i had heard follow the arrows one more time i would have punched the tv! lol
why would an amount of items just suddenly change.. Its not been a great crOn/ MoP day to say the least
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:39 pm
kira1000
Decorated
Joined: 29 May 2013 Posts: 255
@mrshomersimpson I can explain it to you, assuming you are relating to the "purchase" and "agreement" sections, in this case, agreement relates to the amount of GUNS being purchased and purchase itself refers to the DISGUISES that are used to cover up the guns, the amounts change since they need more disguises to cover all the guns. I know this since I asked myself a few days ago.
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:50 pm
Datango
Decorated
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 194
Has anyone's TRUST increased after resolving the Police Interview task or does this increase at the next MoP Review?
Also Telford Dupere in the Document has morphed into Telford Dupree in the outcome.
_________________--
Datango
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:41 am
Elethamei
Unfettered
Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Posts: 448 Location: Finland
The trust only increases when you request the document and purple documents increases the trust by 50 points. And it should show immediately.
Edit: Nope. Sorry, I got mixed up with words. I meant decreases. You lose 50 points when you request the document. You don't get any points from that, because you are doing that for cr0n, not MoP.
_________________
@elethamei
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:20 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending