Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 15, 2024 5:28 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
[VIDEO] Entry #82
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 22 of 27 [392 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Author Message
Marble Hornets
Entrenched


Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 946

Also they basically said in their latest podcast that a lot of S1 stuff wasn't planned out and kind of just filmed on a "this would look cool" basis. I never really take s1 stuff into consideration for theories because i've always felt that was the case.

Like, it's clear that in s1 masky was supposed to be totheark. IDK. People will say we *have* to use season 1 stuff in our theories because it is still canon by definition, but from a creative standpoint I have to imagine a lot of the ideas were scrapped later on. And that's assumption, but I feel it's an educated assumption and am willing to admit when something directly contradicts a theory from s1.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:52 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JAL13
Decorated


Joined: 10 Jun 2013
Posts: 269
Location: Between Realms

Wondertje wrote:
Please do, and don't forget: for the highest grade you also need to be able to apply your work with real life examples, since applicability is what it's all about! Smile




YouTube: Link
[/youtube]

I really like you. I really do.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
twistedpuppet
Entrenched


Joined: 18 Feb 2012
Posts: 950
Location: New avatar based on art made by @TheGinky for me for my birthday.

JAL13 wrote:
Wondertje wrote:
Please do, and don't forget: for the highest grade you also need to be able to apply your work with real life examples, since applicability is what it's all about! Smile




YouTube: Link
[/youtube]

I really like you. I really do.


I don't have anything to say. I just wanted to quote this for truth. Razz

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Osttle
Unfettered


Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 415
Location: Your Basement

Marble Hornets wrote:
Also they basically said in their latest podcast that a lot of S1 stuff wasn't planned out and kind of just filmed on a "this would look cool" basis. I never really take s1 stuff into consideration for theories because i've always felt that was the case.

Like, it's clear that in s1 masky was supposed to be totheark. IDK. People will say we *have* to use season 1 stuff in our theories because it is still canon by definition, but from a creative standpoint I have to imagine a lot of the ideas were scrapped later on. And that's assumption, but I feel it's an educated assumption and am willing to admit when something directly contradicts a theory from s1.


I consider it cannon. I think they just would have worked around it. Or atleast try to make it canonical. It would be a bad directorial desicion to ignore season 1 entirley.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:56 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
yamam
Boot


Joined: 05 Dec 2013
Posts: 14

To be fair, the fact that Tim didn't ever get the voice mail does suggest that there is something paranormal going on. OOG it seems like a way to strongly hint that TO interfered somehow.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 4:59 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MariahTedder
Veteran


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 116

If Tim HAD received the voicemail but forgot about it, it would still be on his phone UNLESS if TO erased it.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 6:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DHawk314
Entrenched


Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 1087

See you people are thinking about this too much. Occam's Razor cannot be applied to fiction. Yes, in real life, a simple explanation is more likely than an analogous complex one. But in fiction, the simplest explanation is not always right. The writers have zero motivation to make the explanation simpler unless they're going for realism, which fyi they're not.

The simplest explanation to say, totheark's motives would be that the ark means nothing and he's just a crazy man, and that his decision to have Jay killed was just a random change in motive because he's insane. We already essentially know totheark is crazy, so that does not add anymore variables. But that would be shitty writing and so it's not more likely to turn out true just because it's the simplest.

An equivalent rule for fiction would be, if there's an amount of actual IG evidence for two theories, the better written one is more likely to be true. Sometimes this means the more realistic one, which theoretically is more likely to be the simpler one, but in this case it's irrelevant.

Going back to the fact that you guys are thinking about things too much: The phone is a plot device. Jay calls Tim as a method of exposition, to show his change in motive between this entry and 77. Tim not knowing about this is important to how he acts in 77; he hardly seems to expect Jay's arrival the way he would had he heard the message.

The Operator is full of supernatural bullshit, he can get rid of memories, fuck up technology, mess with time at least a little bit, and change the spacial layout of forests and shit, and one of those things caused a communication problem having to do with a cellphone. Will we ever find out which done? Like almost definitely not. Are any of them more likely than the other? Ya if you wanna be really really really pedantic, the memory loss thing is closer to what we've physically seen the Operator do than that he just messed with the phone's technology, since we've only seen him mess with cameras, but it really could be any of them. Big important question: Considering it doesn't affect the plot and we'll never find out, does it actually matter? Answer: Well technically that's subjective but I'm gonna say no.

tl;dr Occam's Razor is bullshit to use in this context, there's no way of knowing how the call was blocked or whatever happened, and no random explanation is "More likely" than any other. It's true occasionally theorists bend the facts to fit theories, and it's annoying because you see them doing it and its obviously a bullshit theory anyway, and they'd know if they thought for a second the creator didn't intend it, and they're just stretching shit for the sake of it. This isn't one of those cases, the creators might have intended a technological explanation, they might not have, and it doesn't actually matter.
_________________
I was just lurking around the forums and i have no idea who MH is

I'm in here sometimes: http://tinychat.com/thehoodyhub


PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 6:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SilentMedusa
Entrenched

Joined: 04 Jul 2013
Posts: 904

I apologize if this has already been mentioned, but on rewatching this I just noticed Tim did not seem very steady on his feet here. It seems a little ominous, considering his statement that he hasn't had his medication for some time.

As for the missing voice mail thing, I'm going to to assume TO did something to keep Tim from getting it, because that's the explanation that makes the most sense to me.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 6:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Wondertje
Veteran


Joined: 08 Feb 2014
Posts: 104
Location: Cold North

DHawk314 wrote:
The Operator is full of supernatural bullshit, he can get rid of memories, fuck up technology, mess with time at least a little bit, and change the spacial layout of forests and shit, and one of those things caused a communication problem having to do with a cellphone. Will we ever find out which done? Like almost definitely not.


Essentially, I'm saying that I agree with you, and this forum needs a like-button for moments like this!

@SilentMedusa - There has been talking and mentionings of Tim possibly limping in the video, wich would imply that he was indeed starting to become sicker and possibly go into Masky state. However, the video isn't clear enough to really extrapolate any evidence for it, but it's quite plausible seeing as he's without his medication.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:12 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
The Happy Madman
Boot


Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Posts: 67
Location: Nearby

Marble Hornets wrote:
Also, the Øperator must emit some kind of gas that immediately attacks someone's respiratory system. This causes the coughing/collapse, the coughing up of blood, and the desire for water.


Holy crap. You just reminded me of a dream that I had a long time ago. Not too far into season 3, I dreamt that the next entry (I can't remember which one it was) contained footage of Alex hunting down the Øperator at night while wearing a gas mask, which made me think that TØ emitted noxious gases.
_________________
Praise the Nidhogg.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JAL13
Decorated


Joined: 10 Jun 2013
Posts: 269
Location: Between Realms

DHawk314 wrote:
See you people are thinking about this too much. Occam's Razor cannot be applied to fiction. Yes, in real life, a simple explanation is more likely than an analogous complex one. But in fiction, the simplest explanation is not always right. The writers have zero motivation to make the explanation simpler unless they're going for realism, which fyi they're not.

The simplest explanation to say, totheark's motives would be that the ark means nothing and he's just a crazy man, and that his decision to have Jay killed was just a random change in motive because he's insane. We already essentially know totheark is crazy, so that does not add anymore variables. But that would be shitty writing and so it's not more likely to turn out true just because it's the simplest.

An equivalent rule for fiction would be, if there's an amount of actual IG evidence for two theories, the better written one is more likely to be true. Sometimes this means the more realistic one, which theoretically is more likely to be the simpler one, but in this case it's irrelevant.

Going back to the fact that you guys are thinking about things too much: The phone is a plot device. Jay calls Tim as a method of exposition, to show his change in motive between this entry and 77. Tim not knowing about this is important to how he acts in 77; he hardly seems to expect Jay's arrival the way he would had he heard the message.

The Operator is full of supernatural bullshit, he can get rid of memories, fuck up technology, mess with time at least a little bit, and change the spacial layout of forests and shit, and one of those things caused a communication problem having to do with a cellphone. Will we ever find out which done? Like almost definitely not. Are any of them more likely than the other? Ya if you wanna be really really really pedantic, the memory loss thing is closer to what we've physically seen the Operator do than that he just messed with the phone's technology, since we've only seen him mess with cameras, but it really could be any of them. Big important question: Considering it doesn't affect the plot and we'll never find out, does it actually matter? Answer: Well technically that's subjective but I'm gonna say no.

tl;dr Occam's Razor is bullshit to use in this context, there's no way of knowing how the call was blocked or whatever happened, and no random explanation is "More likely" than any other. It's true occasionally theorists bend the facts to fit theories, and it's annoying because you see them doing it and its obviously a bullshit theory anyway, and they'd know if they thought for a second the creator didn't intend it, and they're just stretching shit for the sake of it. This isn't one of those cases, the creators might have intended a technological explanation, they might not have, and it doesn't actually matter.


Thank god someone finally shut up the wannabe intellectuals and logicians around here. Hopefully you'll be around once #83 comes around and another over-analysis has given the entry 6 pages of worthless bullshit. You're my favorite user more than you were before.

P.S - Paper Mario is great.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:20 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Marble Hornets
Entrenched


Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 946

It's also possible he just emits radiation (which would tie into the visual distortion on cameras) but i'd like to think he didn't come into existence the same way the ninja turtles did

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DHawk314
Entrenched


Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 1087

Aww tanks guys.
_________________
I was just lurking around the forums and i have no idea who MH is

I'm in here sometimes: http://tinychat.com/thehoodyhub


PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:31 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraehtot
Unfettered


Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 438
Location: Hoody Hut

DHawk314 wrote:
See you people are thinking about this too much. Occam's Razor cannot be applied to fiction. Yes, in real life, a simple explanation is more likely than an analogous complex one. But in fiction, the simplest explanation is not always right. The writers have zero motivation to make the explanation simpler unless they're going for realism, which fyi they're not.

The simplest explanation to say, totheark's motives would be that the ark means nothing and he's just a crazy man, and that his decision to have Jay killed was just a random change in motive because he's insane. We already essentially know totheark is crazy, so that does not add anymore variables. But that would be shitty writing and so it's not more likely to turn out true just because it's the simplest.

An equivalent rule for fiction would be, if there's an amount of actual IG evidence for two theories, the better written one is more likely to be true. Sometimes this means the more realistic one, which theoretically is more likely to be the simpler one, but in this case it's irrelevant.

Going back to the fact that you guys are thinking about things too much: The phone is a plot device. Jay calls Tim as a method of exposition, to show his change in motive between this entry and 77. Tim not knowing about this is important to how he acts in 77; he hardly seems to expect Jay's arrival the way he would had he heard the message.

The Operator is full of supernatural bullshit, he can get rid of memories, fuck up technology, mess with time at least a little bit, and change the spacial layout of forests and shit, and one of those things caused a communication problem having to do with a cellphone. Will we ever find out which done? Like almost definitely not. Are any of them more likely than the other? Ya if you wanna be really really really pedantic, the memory loss thing is closer to what we've physically seen the Operator do than that he just messed with the phone's technology, since we've only seen him mess with cameras, but it really could be any of them. Big important question: Considering it doesn't affect the plot and we'll never find out, does it actually matter? Answer: Well technically that's subjective but I'm gonna say no.

tl;dr Occam's Razor is bullshit to use in this context, there's no way of knowing how the call was blocked or whatever happened, and no random explanation is "More likely" than any other. It's true occasionally theorists bend the facts to fit theories, and it's annoying because you see them doing it and its obviously a bullshit theory anyway, and they'd know if they thought for a second the creator didn't intend it, and they're just stretching shit for the sake of it. This isn't one of those cases, the creators might have intended a technological explanation, they might not have, and it doesn't actually matter.


Pretty much all of this. I don't know how do you do it, Hawk, but you tend to summarize my thoughts Smile
_________________
Code:
13 24 35 46 57 68 79 83 95 03 15 27 39
an bo cp dq er fs gt hu iv jw kx ly mz


Timman Rescue!


PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:45 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Marble Hornets
Entrenched


Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 946

you know what else is sketchy though

jay had time to upload this video about rosswood switching around but he didn't

this implies one of two things

1) jay didn't want it to be seen (unlikely)

2) tying into my theory on the previous page, jay uploaded the video to his pc in a blackout state fully aware of doing so, but "normal jay" didn't think to look for it. this same instance could have happened with entry 29, although i'd like to believe that was just alex going back the next day after seeing what he did in his own blackout state. if the former is true, it could mean that "blackout jay" and "normal jay" have conflicting interests. mainly because he uploaded it to his pc, but not to the mh youtube.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:24 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 22 of 27 [392 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group