unforum

[hachiman]

[The Totem]

Not sure if this was mentioned already, but "The Ark= Alex R. Kralie". Jay even stated in-game that Alex's middle name didn't begin with R.

[Xman]

"Entry ###### shows us that there are 2 additional masked people alongside Masky himself."

"This is probably the last entry."
*Another entry releases.*
"Looks like this could very well be the last entry."
*Another entry releases.*
"I'm pretty sure this is the last entry, guys."
*Another entry releases.*
(This is in reference to several months ago, when the series clearly wasn't over.)

"It didn't become nighttime suddenly in Entry #23, it just looks that way because ____."

"Hoody is Alex because in Entry #41 when you first see him, there is static. And everytime you see Alex there is static, so therefore Hoody is Alex." (Someone literally tried to argue this on YouTube once.)

"It could very well be possible that Hoody and Masky have nothing to do with TTA."

[Lithp]

The reason I was opposed to Hoody being Future Jay is because there was a ton of evidence pointing to Brian & no real evidence for Future Jay. The only thing was the few times that time sped up, but that was never important to the plot, & it was never shown going backwards, or anything.

[Avrielle_Aniko]

[SilentMedusa]

Not really a theory, but it still irritates the fuck out of me: new Mystery Person is introduced. Clues all point to X character as Mystery Person. Fandom says: "All the clues point to X character being Mystery Person, therefore... it can't possibly be X character."

Some of the dumbest Hoody theories seemed to come from someone's desperate desire for it to be literally anyone but Brian. Including people who weren't even involved until well after Hoody was introduced (and that's not taking into account that Hoody was totheark).

[Avrielle_Aniko]

[Lithp]

I'm kind of with Silent Medusa, here. Argument from Plot Twist happened a lot, & it was always some pretty lame reasoning.

"Occam's razor doesn't count because a plot twist could happen!"

"But theories based on Occam's razor are only wrong on occasion, while your method of PREDICT ALL THE SHIT! nets anywhere from 0 to 1 successful predictions & racks up a lot of failures."

"But a plot twist could happen!"

There's a difference between predicting that a plot twist MIGHT occur & pointing out evidence that suggests a plot twist. For example, in "The Sixth Sense," we have the kid who sees dead people being the ONLY person to interact with this guy throughout the entire movie, who we saw in the beginning got shot, but we never saw the aftermath.

[ledzepfilm]

[SilentMedusa]

[Blackout_2014]

[elford]

^^me too

[Lithp]

[Malckeor]

[Lithp]

What are you talking about? Leaving aside the whole "lol crazy man doing crazy things" non-explanation, that's not "clear" at all. Tim only says that Alex is being used, he doesn't contradict the underlying disease logic, & in fact confirms it with lines like, "You could be spreading it, too!"

That's not a "silly theory accepted by a minority," it's "clear exposition that most people can recognize."

The only thing in that post that sounds like it maybe could be inaccurate is "not under The Operator's influence," & I would need more information about the context of that statement.

Also, yes, it does contradict The Operator's actions. That's far from the only hole in the story.