Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:42 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
[SPEC] High Ranking Officer=Grumpy Old Man definitive?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 2 [25 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 4310
Location: Des Moines, IA

[SPEC] High Ranking Officer=Grumpy Old Man definitive?

Trout me if you must, but a search didn't reveal anything recent on the subject.

The newly unlocked calculus.wav would seem to be definitive proof that the High Ranking Officer and the Grumpy Old Man are one and the same. Does this shed any new light on the spec about the "receipt" conversation and Cpl. Janet Adams?

EDIT - added topic tag -SG

PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 7:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cherry Cotton
Decorated


Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 237

You're absolutely right! I had always interpreted the two conversations in goodbye.wav (when the GOM is put on hold during his tirade about reciepts and evacuation, and the High Ranking Officer has a brief conversation with Mr. Doesn't Drink) as being entirely seperate... but in calculus.wav, the HRO's voice merges perfectly into the GOM. Now, it seems that, when the GOM/HRO is put on hold, Mr. Doesn't Drink comes into the room to tell him that the Apocalypso is lost.

So the new question is... what is the HRO's motivation to complain about Troy and officers and reciepts, if he himself is a part of the military chain of command? Perhaps he is honestly angry about being evacuated so suddenly, or he really did lose important family papers; or, maybe there's a reason that the HRO and the GOM seem like two distinct acts.

Discuss.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 7:39 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SuperJerms
Unfettered


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 537
Location: indiana

I think most of us were under the impression that GOM = HRO by now because of the pauses in the first salvo of recipe3 wavs and some voice similarities, so this is mostly confirmation.

Along with that spec, the common wisdom (as I understand it) is that HRO is an ONI (section 3?) spook, and possibly McKaskill's contact. At any rate, the theory goes that GOM is a total fiction, HRO has always been on Earth, and the point of the GOM call was to a) verify that Janet is dead, and b) introduce HRO.

We still have nothing definitive on who Janet is, but the GOM wavs basically show that HRO is a clandestine ONI operative of some sort. Most of ONI is clandestine in some way or another, so he could be acting like GOM for a ton of speculative reasons. So, his point with the whole recipt issue? It may just be a red herring...what's important is that he is ONI, he is a ranking official, and we can see already that ONI often has to resort to cloak-and-dagger techniques to do thier jobs. At least for now, the more important issue is what HRO and LRO are revealing about the Apocalypso, Troy, and Harmony.

I think aliendial is right on here, when he specs that this is a situation similar to the WWII German Enigma code machine (Beast easter egg, anyone?)...Harmony seems to be a doomed planet, like Troy, and we have to be judicious about how much we reveal to the Covenant about what we have intercepted of their plans.
_________________
"If we could make your toaster print something we would." - Jordan Weisman

PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:31 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
Astald
Unfettered

Joined: 01 Aug 2004
Posts: 747
Location: Just outside of Pittsburgh (Go Steelers!)

The High Ranking Official also slipped into his Grumpy Old Man voice in alt_burgundy, when he says "They don't make it anymore." Like SuperJerms, I assumed everyone had already accepted HRO as the GOM.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 10:07 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 4310
Location: Des Moines, IA

Astald wrote:
The High Ranking Official also slipped into his Grumpy Old Man voice in alt_burgundy, when he says "They don't make it anymore." Like SuperJerms, I assumed everyone had already accepted HRO as the GOM.

I was always of the opinion that they were the same, but there are always plenty of folks around here who demand proof of everything before they let a subject drop. The alt_burgundy bit was subtle at best. There is no mistaking it in calculus.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 10:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

well I have two qualms with accepting they are the same person just yet (I'm not against it though, just need to explain these issues)

1. in goodbye of chapter 1, the HRO knocks and enters the room, after the cranky old man speaks... (if this has been explained then apologies, but please explain it again here Razz)

2. Listening to cranky in chapter 1 and the impersonation the HRO does in calculus, they don't sound like the same person... in calculus you can tell that the voice foundation is the same, that it's indeed HRO that's impersonating an old man... but cranky from chapter 1 just doesn't sound like it's based on the HRO's voice... HRO's voice is very deep and clear, whereas cranky's voice is slightly higher-pitch and grizzlier, IMO...
This point is more subjective though, so it's not directly disprovable...

I (and the other cranky!=HRO folk) will gladly step back if it can be proven... maybe it'll wait until a later audio clip... I dunno.

Quote:
but there are always plenty of folks around here who demand proof of everything before they let a subject drop

And yeah, that's the difference between fact and spec. We don't know for a fact yet that cranky is HRO... the main glaring issues being the two points I mentioned above... if they can be dispelled, then I (dunno about anyone else) will personally stand corrected and jump on board the == bandwagon... obviously since it's dispelled fact Razz
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:59 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
ElectricSheep
Boot

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 10

I think I can help you piece this together.

It is not the High Ranking Official that knocks on the door and walks into the office, its the Lieutenant Doesn't Drink. Just from listening to how the conversation flows and the footsteps, and that it seems more natural for the High Ranking Official to have a private office that the Lieutenant would have to knock before gaining entry rather than the other way about.

Leaving it that the High Ranking Official is only using the Grumpy Old Man as a cover, this leads to a few new questions. The High Ranking Official is a member of Section 0, so what need would he have to place a call through ordinary civilian use channels? The only particular piece of information attached to that call with any meaning is a name: Janet Adams. He did, after all, make very sure to include it.

So why place the call? To see if Janet Adams was KIA? Certainly a High Ranking Official from Section 0 would have much better methods at his disposal to determine whether or not a particular corporal is alive or not. Assuming that there was some kind of personal attachment between the High Ranking Official and Lance Corporal Janet Adams, I would have expected a slightly different reaction when the news of her death was announced. It doesn't seem to phase the act that the High Ranking Official is putting on. This either means that he is very[i] good at suppressing himself entirely, there is no personal connection between the two, or that the High Ranking Official [i]already knew whether or not Lance Corporal Janet Adams was alive. I'm leaning towards the final reason. We are dealing with a branch of the ONI here, and what is the job of the ONI? Managing and manipulating intelligence.

It could very well be that the purpose of the call was to verify that the KIA status for Lance Corporal Janet Adams had trickled down to a certain level, a level that would be accessible to the general public—family members and whatnot. It doesn't matter if Lance Corporal Janet Adams is actually dead or not, only that she appear to be dead at an informational level.

Following this line of reasoning, and keeping in mind that this is the ONI, what reason would there be to make sure that Lance Corporal Janet Adams showed up as KIA for anyone placing a call through normal civilian use chatter lines?

Curiouser and Curiouser...

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 12:40 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

ElectricSheep wrote:
It is not the High Ranking Official that knocks on the door and walks into the office, its the Lieutenant Doesn't Drink. Just from listening to how the conversation flows and the footsteps, and that it seems more natural for the High Ranking Official to have a private office that the Lieutenant would have to knock before gaining entry rather than the other way about.

You know that actually kind of makes sense, although there was no 'permission' granted by the HRO for the person who knocked to enter... it was just a knock and an immediate entry... so it would mean it must be a fairly casual meeting, or perhaps the lieutenant stepped out for a bit and just came back. And also though, the knock is to the left, and the lieutenant starts talking on the right, while the HRO is still left/middle... and the footsteps from the door are heard in the center, even while the lieutenant begins speaking, on the right... it could just be bad editing, but I'm probably up to about 90% sure now that cranky is the HRO... just a few more loose ends to tie up... at least until they blatantly reveal that they are one and the same... calculus would probably be that revelation... I'm just stubborn Razz
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 1:01 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
SuperJerms
Unfettered


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 537
Location: indiana

thebruce wrote:
although there was no 'permission' granted by the HRO for the person who knocked to enter... it was just a knock and an immediate entry... so it would mean it must be a fairly casual meeting, or perhaps the lieutenant stepped out for a bit and just came back. And also though, the knock is to the left, and the lieutenant starts talking on the right, while the HRO is still left/middle... and the footsteps from the door are heard in the center, even while the lieutenant begins speaking, on the right... it could just be bad editing


Or HRO has a glass front to his office and just waved the LRO in while he knocked, or he was just stepping out like you said, or there are other ways to explain it.

Positional audio-wise, it's still all good. HRO could just be pacing across the room. Let me just break out the trusty Flan-O-Graph chart here for a moment.
_________________
"If we could make your toaster print something we would." - Jordan Weisman

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:01 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

yes but if you listen closely, there are footsteps to the left/middle while the lieutenant is speaking from the right ("a lot of chatter from the cable sir")... unless he's, leaning way back so he's walking with his feet on the other side of the room, there's 2 options - it's not the lieutenant who's doing the walking, or it's an audio editing goof... or there's a 3rd option we missed.
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:55 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
MeKiwi
Decorated


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 260
Location: San Francisco

thebruce wrote:
yes but if you listen closely, there are footsteps to the left/middle while the lieutenant is speaking from the right ("a lot of chatter from the cable sir")... unless he's, leaning way back so he's walking with his feet on the other side of the room, there's 2 options - it's not the lieutenant who's doing the walking, or it's an audio editing goof... or there's a 3rd option we missed.


Hrmm... I think it all depends where we assume the recorder was placed. If it's on HRO himself, then as the Lt. walked in HRO could have turned to his left to look at a viewscreen or something... who knows? It really could be anything.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 5:10 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

MeKiwi wrote:
Hrmm... I think it all depends where we assume the recorder was placed. If it's on HRO himself, then as the Lt. walked in HRO could have turned to his left to look at a viewscreen or something... who knows? It really could be anything.

hate to keep carrying this on, but that wouldn't change the fact that there are footsteps in a completely different part of the room than the Lt.'s voice... regardless of the orientation or position of the 'recorder', the voice of someone walking should always be exactly where their footsteps are falling, no?
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 5:16 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
MeKiwi
Decorated


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 260
Location: San Francisco

thebruce wrote:
hate to keep carrying this on, but that wouldn't change the fact that there are footsteps in a completely different part of the room than the Lt.'s voice... regardless of the orientation or position of the 'recorder', the voice of someone walking should always be exactly where their footsteps are falling, no?


Okay, I think I know what you're saying, though I don't currently have the audio equipment (read: stereo speakers) necessary to tell. I'll check when I get home, but I'll take your word on it for now.

Since everything else to this point has so far seemed to be well thought out, I would guess that option #2 is unlikely, and therefore (in lieu of an unknown option #3) option #1 is our best bet. Interesting.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 6:03 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
IMnotGarbage
Boot

Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 44

excuse me but what does Lt mean. on these forums you have to type out all words or you will be judged. your not intelligent if you dont type out your words. never use Lt again



type out your words please

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 6:25 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
vpisteve
Asshatministrator


Joined: 30 Sep 2002
Posts: 2441
Location: 1987

IMnotGarbage wrote:
excuse me but what does Lt mean. on these forums you have to type out all words or you will be judged. your not intelligent if you dont type out your words. never use Lt again



type out your words please


Snarkiness, however is a lovely thing. Even better than not typing out your words. Rolling Eyes
_________________
Making the world a better place, one less mime at a time.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 6:30 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [25 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group