Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:29 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
[LOCKED] [META] Dogpiling, factions, etc.
View previous topicView next topic
Page 3 of 5 [65 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
Author Message
AngriBuddhist
Entrenched


Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Wa.

Let's assume that this game is not as rigidly planned out as I
and a great many others believe. Imagine that the PMs left
hooks in their own design for branching plot points that could
be taken depending on the actions of the community or even
an individual. If the capture of the SP was only an option that
was open to us (and not prescripted) then a solution must have
also come along with it. They would not allow us to move the
game in this direction if it only led to a dead end.

In this case it really doesn't matter to the community which
path we take. If an individual takes action (PM condoned in
weephun's case) based on his own desires, the game still
moves forward and we react to it.

We had the clues right in front of us. Verified "crew" members
told us that they were questioned about SP. They didn't follow
the PMs lead. Weephun refused to tell us what happened and
honestly told us that he was told to keep it quiet.

Some put the pieces together and sent emails to SP to warn
her that a trap was about to be sprung. At this point, if the
PMs did not want to follow this course of action (and felt that
they actually needed to justify their own) they could have
stood down. They did NOT.

The PMs have planted many seeds in the past of this ARG,
here's a few:

1. SP states that the Queen wants to put her back into the coffin.
2. When asking us to email location/times, she begs us to really
be there so she doesn't get caught eavesdropping on the Queen.
3. The Peridita story.
4. The growing relationship with the Flea sets him up as a new
potential ally.
5. We still don't know who the SP is and by coincidence this new
twist requires us to come up with her name.

Additionally, as in any good role-playing game, establishment of
a setting comes before the allowance of devience. You first lay
a foundation before allowing players to effect the outcome. Once
it's in place, actual role-playing is then possible. You do not want
your players leaving the tavern before they overhear the story
of the legendary treasure.

This was the first chance in this entire ARG that it seemed that
a choice could be made. Now, I understand that some believe
that a different path would have been preferable but consider
that it most likely only seemed that way. On the other hand,
if a choice was really possible why not make one?

As for the disclosure of information, yes, this is [META] land and
this choice could have been discussed here and probably would
have been for an excessive amount of time. Weephun made a
decision though and the PMs (through Melissa) asked him to not
reveal it. The PMs designed this game. They run it and if they
gave me an ingame reason to not reveal a piece of information
to any of you, I WOULD COMPLY.

They prompt us all the time and we comply.
The "crew" was prompted and weephun complied.

Of all the people here, I would say that he would probably like
to see the SP freed more than anyone. Not simply because it's
a new puzzle to be solved but because of all the unwarranted
guilt trips that you psuedo-intellectuals are placing on him. You
feel right in your actions because you can justify them so eloquently.

Quite honesty, you and the others who are behaving like this
make me sick. It says quite alot about your selfcentered,
jealous souls. Obviously you are all wicked, nasty people so
believe me when I say that if there is a Hell, and I go there,
I fully expect you to be there waiting to throw fiery excrement
at me. Evil or Very Mad

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:20 am
Last edited by AngriBuddhist on Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:34 am; edited 3 times in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Flidget Jerome
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 308

Re: Thoughts of a Game Enthusiast

ariock wrote:
(in game)
We got into this to help Dana. Melissa wants to kill Dana. SP was trying to help Dana. Therefore, we should not be helping Melissa to harm the SP.
(/in game)


Did we? I didn't.

I'm in this to help Melissa, a military A.I. on a very important mission that has ramifications on the future of the humanity. Unfortunately Melissa is currently damaged and needs repairs, a task she is asking us to help her with. Dana is a civilian who accidentally interfered with a matter of vital interplanetary security, damaging Melissa and the precious information she carries even further. The Sleeping Princess is a completely unknown entity who acts like a little girl, possibly to disarm us and make us trust her. To trust her because she acts like an innocent would be a mistake. The Pious Flea is a virus who we have of late seen become friendly with the Sleeping Princess, but who has hijacked Melissa's primary directive for his own purposes.

From an ingame point of view, I see our priorities being to repair Melissa and destroy the Pious Flea. Once Melissa is restored, it should be easy to explain to her that Dana's mistake was not meant as a hostile action, but that's a secondary objective compared to the survival of our species.

So I agree, ingame and out, with Lt. Weehun's actions perfectly. We don't know who the Sleeping Princess is or where she comes from. Putting her back in storage is the most logical action at this point. We can figure out what she is later and if she needs to be helped or destroyed. Right now we have more important things to do.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:32 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

look, it comes down to roleplaying an addition attitude... in-game and out-of-game, for each of us...

out of game: let's further the game! good on ya to all the crew!
in-game: (eg) how could you betray us and get the princess captured?!

personally, my in-game attitude is simply: ok, weephun's gotta now really be on Melissa's A-list - I wonder how much he can get out of her in the future... I know he's one of us, and not really her crew, so I'm trusting that he won't betray us and will keep up his role of a 'spy'...

now in a sense, weephun (et al) are playing double-roles... in-game, AND a fake crew member... *I*, as a player, need to be able to distinguish my own attitudes between in-game and out-of-game, or it just ruins it for everybody...
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:35 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
IMnotGarbage
Boot

Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 44

I like how my post was analyzed by the bruce when it didnt need to be. So if information is suppose to be kept secret then how did this explode into someone having/or not having secret information. If someone had secret information about the game, and wasnt to tell anybody then none of our posts would be here. If we go by what you say bruce, which is if someone has info that was to be secret then why would we be left out. Thats a good point to an extent. Now what im saying is if someone has info to be kept secret then why would this person say i have valuable info but i wont tell you guys. What im saying is if i were a verified crew member, i wouldnt say i know the ending to the game and then say i cant tell you. Your saying thats alright though. If someone has info you either need to go all out or not at all. Dont tease me with Melissa told me the what is going to happen at the end of this game but i cant tell you. And im not saying that what i just said happend or is going to happen.

Secondly dont analyze my post with your opinions. Analyze them with facts.
_________________
plz, people, u know i alwayz win. i luv bees 2.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:00 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
vortech
Unfettered


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 465
Location: Atlanta, GA

IMnotGarbage wrote:
I like how my post was analyzed by the bruce when it didnt need to be. So if information is suppose to be kept secret then how did this explode into someone having/or not having secret information. If someone had secret information about the game, and wasnt to tell anybody then none of our posts would be here. If we go by what you say bruce, which is if someone has info that was to be secret then why would we be left out. Thats a good point to an extent. Now what im saying is if someone has info to be kept secret then why would this person say i have valuable info but i wont tell you guys. What im saying is if i were a verified crew member, i wouldnt say i know the ending to the game and then say i cant tell you. Your saying thats alright though. If someone has info you either need to go all out or not at all. Dont tease me with Melissa told me the what is going to happen at the end of this game but i cant tell you. And im not saying that what i just said happend or is going to happen.

Secondly dont analyze my post with your opinions. Analyze them with facts.


Oh dear lord. . . now Weephun gave too much information?

Can we just lock every one of these threads? Any progress from them has stalled and it's time to put this bickering in the glass.

EDIT: ok, I changed my mind. Unforum isn't so draconian and that's good. I'll follow other's example and just stay out of these threads.
_________________
- RM
@ Piratenews.network
--
Occam's Razor tells us that Occam was boring, so I'm going with the epidemic theory
-Lore Sjöberg


PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:33 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

one more thing to say, then I'm done with this topic too...

IMnotGarbage wrote:
I like how my post was analyzed by the bruce when it didnt need to be.

Well, easier to respond to certain pieces then to spill everything in one convoluted mess.

Quote:
So if information is suppose to be kept secret then how did this explode into someone having/or not having secret information.

Because people made it into that.

Quote:
If we go by what you say bruce, which is if someone has info that was to be secret then why would we be left out.

umm... because that information was to be kept secret? That's why anyone other than the receipient would be left out...

Quote:
Now what im saying is if someone has info to be kept secret then why would this person say i have valuable info but i wont tell you guys. What im saying is if i were a verified crew member, i wouldnt say i know the ending to the game and then say i cant tell you.

At no point has that happened, and at no point will that happen, save the person you'd be talking to would be a PM.

And at no point did any of the crew say they have valuable info but won't tell us. They revealed their conversation, and in the interest of letting us know everything they could OOG, had to say they a portion was told to remain confidential. if they didn't do that, they would be lying, OOG. What do you think the backlash would have been had we not known at all that weephun revealed the princess until *gasp* the 404 says you told melissa how to get princess?? why didn't you tell us???
There is no clean resolution. The people who take things so personally will always complain, IF they can't distinguish between playing their in-game role, and their out-of-game emotions...

Quote:
Your saying thats alright though. If someone has info you either need to go all out or not at all. Dont tease me with Melissa told me the what is going to happen at the end of this game but i cant tell you. And im not saying that what i just said happend or is going to happen.

so why are you complaining?

Quote:
Secondly dont analyze my post with your opinions. Analyze them with facts.

well then don't reply to my opinion with your opinion, only answer them with fact... <shrug> In the words of Bruce (almighty) That's the way the cookie crumbles!

In summary: if you can't separate these two points - then you'll either ruin the game for players who can, or you should question your reasons for playing...

1. in-game attitude
2. out-of-game attitude
you figure out what's what. At no point out of game should we quarrel with each other or disrespect each other, if we're all trying to finish the game. But we need to respect each other's in-game decisions, even if our in-game attitude hates the situation...

Anyway, yeah I'm done too... don't want to help fan any animosity that there may already be, so I'm shutting up now and moving on back into the game... this topic is killing it... *sigh*
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:54 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
ariock
Has a Posse


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 762
Location: SF East Bay

AngriBuddhist wrote:
As for the disclosure of information, yes, this is [META] land and
this choice could have been discussed here and probably would
have been for an excessive amount of time. Weephun made a
decision though and the PMs (through Melissa) asked him to not
reveal it. The PMs designed this game. They run it and if they
gave me an ingame reason to not reveal a piece of information
to any of you, I WOULD COMPLY.

They prompt us all the time and we comply.
The "crew" was prompted and weephun complied.

Of all the people here, I would say that he would probably like
to see the SP freed more than anyone. Not simply because it's
a new puzzle to be solved but because of all the unwarranted
guilt trips that you psuedo-intellectuals are placing on him. You
feel right in your actions because you can justify them so eloquently.

Quite honesty, you and the others who are behaving like this
make me sick. It says quite alot about your selfcentered,
jealous souls. Obviously you are all wicked, nasty people so
believe me when I say that if there is a Hell, and I go there,
I fully expect you to be there waiting to throw fiery excrement
at me. Evil or Very Mad


Wow. Someone pissed in your cheerios. There is one part of your ad-hominem (we pseudo-intellectuals love the big words) attack I want to address. There is no jealousy here. I know that is hard for YOU to believe. I know your momma told you that kids who disagree with you are jealous, but that isn't always how it works in the real world.

As for the rest of what you said, blah blah, heard it all before, make a NEW POINT for gods sake. Or try this, answer one of mine? hm?

Dana specifically requested that crew members PROVIDE information. Answer that, rather than spewing your rote rant. Thanks.

At least Flidget makes a POINT.

And to answer that point, we do not know that we need to get Melissa back to the future. But that is good spec. For someone to take themselves away from this community based on it is, I think, inadvisable. And then to pop back in afterwards acting like nothing has changed is just silly.

I think I agree with vortech that this should be locked. If only to preserve AngriBuddhist's amazing logic. Seriously buddy, way to totally miss the point and then tack on a personal attack.

and vortech, you are totally taking IM's comment out of context. He is saying weephun was essentially gloating about not being able to tell us. I don't know if I agree with his analysis, but don't mischaracterize what he said.

In any case. I am done now, (bout time, you demon, and don't let the door hit you..etc etc) unless anyone has some intelligent comments to make. I won't hold my breath. No matter how much you wish I might, Angri.
_________________
"It says, 'Let's BEE friends'...and there's a picture of a bee!" -Ralph Wiggum
When the Apocalypse comes, it'll be in base64.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:57 pm
Last edited by ariock on Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
IMnotGarbage
Boot

Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 44

Bruce the questions i ask are retorical, and forgive me if i mispelled that word, so i dont know why you are answering them. Secondly i didnt answer your opinions with opinions i simply said if something were to happen then i would want to know, which would be a fact.
_________________
plz, people, u know i alwayz win. i luv bees 2.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:09 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Ranger D
Unfettered

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 522
Location: Nor Cal

Ariock, you bring up an excellent point comaring this game to KOTOR and Counter-Strike. But there is one fundamental difference between those role-playing games, and this one: did we have any say whatsoever with the SP getting captured?

In KOTOR, you know that your actions affect what sort of jedi you become, heck it's on the box. In CS, yeah if you kill your teammates, well...that's pretty much common sense. The big question is if this plot point was set in stone or if the PMs decided to take what weephun told Melissa and ran with it. Depending on that answer, I would have different reactions to what weephun did.

a). If the SP was pre-destined to be emprisoned, and it would've been whoever answered the phone, then I would say yay for the surprise.

b). But if the PMs just decided to go with the flow and lock her away as a RESULT of what weephun said, then I would have to be pretty hard on weephun. The SP really hasn't done anything yet, and I think it was premature to lock her away before we can get more info out of her.

I'm with Ariock on why we are playing the game. This thing crash landed on Dana's server and then threatened her life. I like Halo and know more than my fair share of Bungie lore, but I feel that we need to sit back and ask, "ok what is the main goal here?"

My point is to say that, in most games, we know the rules. But here it seems, even the rules are an unknown. It basically boils down to "did we have the choice?" Ultimately I hope that this was pre-destined, and that the game will get better because of it. I am puting my trust in the PMs that their goal is to make a game that is fun and enjoyable (and to promote Halo 2). I would hate to think that this is some giant ARG experiment and the PMs did this just to see what happened. I'm afraid we may have to wait until the end of the game to find out Wink

Ranger D

EDIT-spelling
_________________
Sofia, with a dash of Sophrosune and a pinch of Mythopoeia.
LastCallPoker : Durandal
Chief Warrant Officer Ranger D, UNSC Apocalypso


PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:22 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
vortech
Unfettered


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 465
Location: Atlanta, GA

ariock wrote:
Or try this, answer one of mine? hm?

Dana specifically requested that crew members PROVIDE information. Answer that, rather than spewing your rote rant. Thanks.
Dana requested we provide information, she did not request we provide information to you. At best you can argue that we(ephun) had to decide which character's request to comply with. Weephun decided to permute so as to fulfill both requests as much as they were compatible. Take note that deciding to follow either character request does not involve informing you.
ariock wrote:

I think I agree with vortech that this should be locked. If only to preserve AngriBuddhist's amazing logic. Seriously buddy, way to totally miss the point and then tack on a personal attack.
I retracted before you posted this, and if you ackonolage ad homs as unproductive you should try to rise above it.
ariock wrote:

and vortech, you are totally taking IM's comment out of context. He is saying weephun was essentially gloating about not being able to tell us. I don't know if I agree with his analysis, but don't mischaracterize what he said.
I don't see how I took it out of context when I quoted the whole post. Regardless, his point was that Weephun had two choices: full disclosure and total silence. Since Weephun chose the middle ground IM was scolding him for either giving too much information or not enough (if not both). do you interpret this in a way I don't see?
_________________
- RM
@ Piratenews.network
--
Occam's Razor tells us that Occam was boring, so I'm going with the epidemic theory
-Lore Sjöberg


PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:00 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
AngriBuddhist
Entrenched


Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Wa.

I also agree with you, Ariok, on why we are playing this game.
Agreement ends there however.

I've seen the "facts" that you've spewn and heard the opinions you've
lobbed. And, no, I haven't missed your point. I just think it's a ridiculous
one. I don't think that you are stupid based on your disagreement with
me. My opinion of your stupidity is based solely on your selfish actions.

You can insult someone's character because they had the audacity to
make a decision without consulting you first.
You state that something is "fact" because you believe it to be.
You have only addressed the portions of our posts that you have some
eloquent defense for where we have replied to your entire posts with
entire posts of our own, addressing each ridiculous point you make.
You seem to believe that if someone doesn't agree with you that they
are to stupid to get your point.

Your point is a mean and spitefull one and no matter how logically
you present it, I dearly hope that no one will agree with you.

Respond or rant all you would like to this, I'm done.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:03 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Oea
Boot

Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 53

Look, here's the problem

There's people here who've been 'playing' ILB much longer than SOME of the 'crew members' and have done more work.

Seeing someone with a late august join date that happened to get lucky and do a live call right when you've been answering payphones, solving puzzles, doing things like a MADMAN is more than a bit frustrating. Then seeing that these 'crew' members are withholding juicy game-critical information (what else could be there?) makes people (understandably) a little upset and vengeful.

I'm not seeing it's right to feel that way, it's just the way things are.

I think the PMs need to address this issue and think of something that ALL the players can participate in at once, not just a select few, as this way will inevitably BREED hate. The design is a good one, but poorly implemented . Maybe make the 'crew' circulating, dropping/adding members each week (Maybe we'll see that) Or something else.

Right now, and I'm sure there's a lot of people with me, I feel like I'm watching a football game where my team just sacked our own QB.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ironchefmike
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 91
Location: Brookline, MA

Oea wrote:
Look, here's the problem

There's people here who've been 'playing' ILB much longer than SOME of the 'crew members' and have done more work.

....

Right now, and I'm sure there's a lot of people with me, I feel like I'm watching a football game where my team just sacked our own QB.


Uh, the join date isn't exactly the best way to determine how long anyone's been 'playing' the game. There ARE other forums out there discussing the ilovebees website.

This whole 'I deserve a pseudo-military title because I answered more axons than you' attitude by several people is a bit childish...yet, elitist.

Plus this is total Trout

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:54 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
AngriBuddhist
Entrenched


Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Wa.

Sure, I have been here since late July and would have loved to have
gotten a live call at one of the 4 axons I got on Tuesday. Or the 3 I got
the week before. Or possibly one of 5 I'll get 2 days from now.
Yes, I'm a bit jealous of the ones that did but I will not try to take
any of their enjoyment from them.

The PMs told us to not hack the ladybee777 email- we complied
The PMs realized that the first axon to be cancelled would have
caused some "legal" problems. By cancelling it, they told us that
it wasn't imperitive to go to those lengths- we complied.
The PMs told weephun to not tell us what happened during his
conversation and gave him a mission- he complied.

They know what they are doing. Any and all information has been
released. Even if the capture of SP could have been avoided it
was too late at that point and waiting 3 days to find out about it
is nothing compaired to the initial wait we had running up to Aug.
24th. The wait actually enhanced the information we received.

I don't think that the PMs were clueless to the fact that this would
cause an uproar. In fact, how could they not know? It is then
either an exceptable outcome for them or a desired one. Either
way, it's a brilliant twist that unfortunately made a target out of
their pawn.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
krystyn
I Never Tire of My Own Voice


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 3651
Location: Is not Chicago

Oea wrote:

There's people here who've been 'playing' ILB much longer than SOME of the 'crew members' and have done more work.


This is pretty much an unquantifiable assertion.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:35 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 5 [65 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group