unforum

[Wolf]

Well, it's a long shot but (as in our "Tell Me" mail link to reportSPLATheismissing.info), I sent mail to reportSPLATitismissing.info.

Reply:

[The Watcher]

Well, the map on that page is of course the map from the MetaCortechs directory.

The Redland location, which is MetaCortex headquarters is highlighted in red and isolated on the http://www.lessonstolearn.net/ page.


Is MetaCortechs coming back to life through fans?

Also:
The title of the page is eyesee.

The first letters of the last three word shown are i c e .

Sound very similar. Coincidence?

[jerebnibob]

Something else

[krystyn]

[Wolf]

Well, I'M one step closer to the solution now.

Not.

Nice catch, though...I played with the settings yesterday and never thought to try that one.

No reply to yesterday's mail either.

[darkphan]

I hope I did the "graphing" right...
(that is using 0,0 for each point, just realized that is probably not right)

[Caterpillar]

I think maybe once you find the plot points then you have to find the second number that the plot points are moved.

i.e. I've plotted the given points (correctly I think)

Q1 (1.5.0.5) blue
Q2 (0.5,0.5) yellow
Q3 (-0.5, -1.5) purple
Q4 (0.5, -1.5) green

Then (and this is only an example, not sure if it is correct) and in order for this theory to work I think I have to assume that there was a mistake and that "0.1" means "1.0"........which is probably unlikely:

The directions say "move by":

Q1 (-1.0, ?)
After moving the -1.0, this blue dot could then go either up or down and be any one of the three red dots on my illustration.
(y=1, 2, or -3)

Q2 (0.1, ?)
As I said this theory only works if you assume this is meant to say 1.0. If so, it puts Q2's yellow dot in line with and again could be any one of the three red dots.
(y=1, 2, or -3)

Q3 (-1.1, ?)
Moving this purple dot -1.1 put it directly below (what was a red dot but I've colored purple), now the next number would be 4 (Haven't had time to actually measure it and am estimating).
(y=4)

Q4 (0.1, ?)
There's that "0.1" again that's messing me up.....and actually I can't make anything work with this green one.

Anyway maybe this will make some sense to someone......I suck at stuff like this, but maybe someone else will see some way to justify it all.

[greywolf]

[darkphan]

Just correcting what the flash actually says:

[Wolf]

I just noticed in the flash that the red light in the center of the map doesn't blink like the others all do.

[Caterpillar]

[Caterpillar]

You know you need to go to bed when..........was wondering about that doorway looking thing.....eye see?

Used only one, two, san, death.

This looks like a FOX to me???
Pictionary anyone?

[Caterpillar]

Still plugging....

1505100505 - One
0505010515 - Two
0515111505 - San
0515010505 - Death

Red = Orig. Coords
Blue = Move By
Green = Final Resting Point

It looks interesting.......but that's about all it does.
Notice the columns of 5s are all lined up?.

1505100505
0505010515
0515111505
0515010505

Tried some binary, didn't get far.
Tried morse (using the 5s as breaks), got this but I'm sure it's a fluke:

. - .-- -
ETWT

- - -.- .
TTKE

- . ... -
TEST

- . -.- -
TEKT

[Omnie]

Darn, I wish I had more time to spend with this. So, just throwing out some thoughts, because I have nothing particularly constructive to add:

It looks like there are (at least) two separate clues there, doesn't it? The pattern of flashing dots on the map, and the grid + coordinate equations. The latter is clearly a clue, the former not so much, but it's still pretty strange. There are two sets of dots lit up at any one time, it seems, with two or three dots per set. Every few frames, one set stays, the other goes out and another set lights up. Is there more to the pattern?

Also, the grid doesn't seem to connect to the map. Should it? And what's with the way the middle 24 squares are slightly lighter than the others?

[trallyus]