Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 12, 2024 8:45 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Diversions » Console/Video Game Discussion
[Halo 2] It's Official: ILB is NOT Halo canon
Moderators: krystyn
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 3 [40 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
Ranger D
Unfettered

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 522
Location: Nor Cal

[Halo 2] It's Official: ILB is NOT Halo canon

I know it was mentioned briefly in this thread, but in an interview with Joe Staten, he states that ilovebees is not official Halo canon.

http://halosm.bungie.org/story/staten102204.html

Here's the quote.
Joe Staten, in response to the question: "If you were to define what is and isn't Halo story canon, would the I Love Bees stuff make the cut?" wrote:
The Bees would not make the cut.

Those guys basically did their own thing with very little Bungie input (save for massaging and approving the initial plot-treatment). While we helped define the boundaries of their fiction, we let them do what they thought best. And I think the game turned out great.

I basically read that as "We didn't help them that much, and even their best was not good enough for us to include as Halo canon." I felt he really didn't like ILB or perhaps, was intimidated by it. He put it down, put it down, then said "oh yeah, it was great." When I talk about ILB, it's innovative, pervasive, fascinating, fun, inspiring, consuming, etc. Joe could've at least called it innovative. But no, it was just "great". Also, he doesn't even say why ILB didn't "make the cut". Did you not like a particular story element? Did it not fit in with some future plans? Could it possibly be that Bungie has absolutely no idea what they are doing, and simply wants to keep all options open?

And it also seems that Bungie is having a very hard time deciding what is and isn't canon.
Joe Staten, in response to the question, "Would the books make the cut?" wrote:
The books are, for better or worse, part of the canon. In the future we may choose to revise or flat-out ignore some of the less appealing ideas (Johnson's biological immunity to the Flood, for example), but folks should treat them as defining elements of the Halo universe.

So now they are going to pick and choose what parts of the "official" books they will or won't decide is true Halo canon? I mean c'mon guys, does integrity and consistency mean anything to anyone anymore?

It's no secret that I was and still am, highly critical of Halo 2's single player story line. But as someone who played ilovebees, I felt a little alientated after reading this.

Anyone care to comment on this? Am I reading too far into this?
_________________
Sofia, with a dash of Sophrosune and a pinch of Mythopoeia.
LastCallPoker : Durandal
Chief Warrant Officer Ranger D, UNSC Apocalypso


PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:10 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
astrovanman
Decorated


Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth

I think that if you own the rights to a story like Halo and you purchase the services of someone, i.e. Eric Nylund or Sean Stewart, to create suppliment, then you should damn well know what's going to be written, and be ready to nix ideas that don't go with the original story before you allow them to be published. I'm sorry Bungie, but you led all your fans in one or two directions and then you cut them loose because you didn't write it yourselves. Boo, I say. Not cool.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:01 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MNPundit
Veteran


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 101
Location: Iowa

I have to agree, it wasn't very cool. All in all, making something non-canon where it was once canon doesn't strike me as very professional. I mean they can do what they want of course, but if they WERE to throw out all the extra stuff it would be disappointing.

I wouldn't be too offended at the tone of the answer though, the whole interview was like that and I would think it stems from their attempts to keep interest in the story up by given answers that are deliberately mysterious (not the Bees answer of course, but the novelizations). All in all I'd say they dropped the ball again over at Bungie.

The continuity problems (and arguements) with modern Robotech are legendary within that community. But even Robotech never designated the extra stuff as cannonical or not until they had to and they had comics, movies, original source material and books to deal with!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:23 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
archon
Decorated

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 250

Everybody relax, breath into the brown paper bag, it'll all be okay.

I was bummed too when I learned that Joe didn't think of ILB as "canon" Halo story, but so what? I don't mean this to come out as an open insult to anyone, but it was pretty obvious when 4orty 2wo started including things like Marathon's rampancy in Halo that ILB had deviated quite a bit from the established Halo fiction. We all had fun with I Love Bees, right? Without Bungie's approval, I Love Bees would've never even existed. Bungie has done bunches of fun games in the past that aren't part of the Halo canon storyline, but that doesn't make them any less fun. If I remember correctly, one time I talked with SpaceBass he said that the story behind 4orty 2wo's The Beast was much, much better than the movie A.I. turned out to be, too. When I Love Bees was going on, much of Bungie was in final crunch mode for Halo 2, and the story to Halo 2 had been done for a long time prior to I Love Bees.

Does it suck that the stuff included in I Love Bees probably won't ever be touched on again in Halo mythology? Sure, but they were two different games to begin with. It's just unfortunate that the universes don't coincide with eachother perfectly.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 2:29 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
vector
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 721
Location: Portland OR

Im not really sure where people got the idea that it was cannon to begin with. all we ever heard was that the ILB writers had access to the Halo bible when makeing the story, this never ment that the story of ILB was to be put into that same bible. I thought it was pretty apparent when at some of the live trainings the Halo people running the events knew nothing of ILB other than they were saposed to play the final message from Melissa. Yes Bungie produced the project, that just meant that they paid for it and let 4orty 2wo do what they do which is create incredable stories that add flavor to the product that they are creating advertising for. Would i love to see a game based on the 1.1s hell yes. but its not going to happen. Will i be looking for ILB clues in any future Bungie games, of course but i dont expect it. Why? ILB was simply not the main focus of Bungie. it was an experiment. they didnt need ILB to advertise the game, the market was already there. So basicaly ILB was what it was, an incredible game that i am proud to have had something to do with it and i dont feel slighted in the least by Bungie.
_________________
The bookworm is just the larval form of the barfly

PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:07 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
regnevah
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 97

perhaps some jealousy that after playing ILB, halo 2's story just doesn't seem as deep in some ways Confused

PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:32 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
INCyr
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Front Range of the Rockies!

MNPundit wrote:
The continuity problems (and arguements) with modern Robotech are legendary within that community. But even Robotech never designated the extra stuff as cannonical or not until they had to and they had comics, movies, original source material and books to deal with!


Heh.... legendary isn't quite the right word... all encompassing is what it seems like sometimes. Of course, the problems within the Robotech community stem from the fact that Jack McKinney added stuff (mental control of the v-techs) to the books where there wasn't anything of the sort mentioned in the anime. It's a different situation here, where a completely new story was produced in the same universe, with an "OK" by the creators of that universe.

Personally, I'll always consider ILB cannon. I think it's a shame that Bungie doesn't, because it was such a great story, and gives them so much to work with. Even if they said "this is canon, but we're never going to do anything with those characters again", that'd be something. But I don't see the point of them not declaring it cannon... what possible harm could it cause?
_________________
DC Axon Hunter!
Master Sergent on the Apocalypso
Gamertag: INCyr


PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:36 am
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
thunderclap8
Entrenched


Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 1139
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

[Puts comic book nerd hat on]

I'll use the same approach I do with all the various incarnations of, say, Batman over the years. Continuity is the collection of stories that make up the concept of 'Batman' to me.

Doesn't matter what someone tells me is canon or 'in continuity' as long as I can resolve the stories I like to make sense.

[Take off comic book nerd hat]

I didn't describe it too well I think, but suffice it to say that ILB is canon for me and that's the important part.
_________________
Gamertag: thunderclap 8 (note the space)
www.HiddenPeanuts.com


PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:07 am
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

I'm not too worried about ILB being canon or not, because really the only major link to Halo 2 is the reference to the master chief near the end, and the artifact (or the reason the convenant came to earth). Halo the game will never touch on previous 'versions' of spartans, at least I don't see it happening in the near future, and planet and ship references, well, if they change, oh well. Happens in movies all the time... a quick reference to something, and some people remember that, and jump all over the writers for continuity problems the next time something changes it... *shrug*

ILB fits very well into Halo 2 as it is... if the next game says Coral was never attacked, for example, oh well... we know Bungie didn't write ILB, so I know ILB is separate from Halo 2. But it still fills in the introductory events to the game.

Really the only thing that bothered me was Joe saying the books may or may not be canon. I mean, come on, these are the Halo novels. If they're not canon, then they're "based on" Halo. At least before we had the sure-fire continuity of the books through the games. Now just by that statement, the novels feel like 'fan-fiction', and now do we really know anything about Halo outside of what the games revealed? I've got a rift now between the books and games where once they were joined at the hip... that may sound extreme, but hey, it's either 100% accurate or it's not... blah
ah well... Halo 1-2, the 3 novels, and ILB, -- [i]all are very great plots and stories[i], whether they connect or not... Smile
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:17 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
vector
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 721
Location: Portland OR

Id say that Bungie's canon is looking more and more like a pop gun. Maybe we have all given Bungie too much credit for being inovative, when the really are just good a licencing out thier name to people who are accualy creative and visionary.
_________________
The bookworm is just the larval form of the barfly

PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:10 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Nova
Unfettered


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 529
Location: Frog blasting the vent core

thebruce wrote:
Really the only thing that bothered me was Joe saying the books may or may not be canon.


Halo 2 doesn't really add much to the overarching story, other than establishing conflict within the Covenant. It doesn't add much of anything to the human side of the story.

As soon as the Halo games actually tell much of a story, which neither one has really done so far, I'd be willing to go along with ignoring the books. But until the games tell that story, I'll get the story from the books.
_________________
***END MESSAGE***

***JUMP PAD ACTIVATION INITIATION START***
***TRANSPORT WHEN READY***


PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:44 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
Nova
Unfettered


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 529
Location: Frog blasting the vent core

vector wrote:
Id say that Bungie's canon is looking more and more like a pop gun. Maybe we have all given Bungie too much credit for being inovative, when the really are just good a licencing out thier name to people who are accualy creative and visionary.


I wouldn't quite go that far. Marathon's story is still one of the absolute best in video games - hell, it stands up well outside of video games and that's saying something.

Halo's story is quite similar to Marathon's, that is to say they share similar elements, but the universe they've created seems pretty dense with imagination. I wouldn't accuse them of not having vision.
_________________
***END MESSAGE***

***JUMP PAD ACTIVATION INITIATION START***
***TRANSPORT WHEN READY***


PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:45 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
vector
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 721
Location: Portland OR

Guess what i ment is not that they dont have vision, but that they dont accualy have much vision past the video games and what we see in the games. Everything else seems to just be fluff to them. Often durring ILB people would pull information from the books beliveing them to be the offical word of Bungie, but it appears now that they done even really like where those books took them. They seem less interested in an imersive story that is really deep and more in just putting out a really good game. Which i canot fault them for, its what they do. They dont write books or do ARGs. They let others that are good at what they do produce those. They are also smart enought not to be too over manage the books and ILB so that they can flurish on thier own and not worry abou the details.
_________________
The bookworm is just the larval form of the barfly

PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
NSA
Boot

Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 54
Location: United States of America

I agree with theBruce, ILB can fit in with Halo 2 whether its considered "canon" or not. All I got out of Joe's statement was that we most likely will not be seeing the "Jersey & Kamal go to White Castle", or any other further adventures.

To me, the ILB storyline did not really reveal any great mysteries of the Haloverse, so removing it doesnt change my overall view of things really. Like Bruce said, if suddenly Coral wasnt attacked or if Troy existed as something else, that might be strange but not totally unforgivable. However, I do hope they keep the info from the books as much as possible, but I also understand stories change and evolve, and what they approved 3 years ago for a book may not fit with where the story is TAKING THEM today. I would love to hear more about the Marines and ODST's that fought on the surface of Halo 04 and died aboard the Truth & Reconciliation ... but so-far they only exist in the novels and thus are in a kind of quasi-canon limbo I guess.

I think since Coral was mentioned in the Halo 2 Booklet, we may be hearing more about it, and it would make sense that it was attacked, since it apparently housed a large Forerunner artifact. As usual, we'll have to wait and see.
_________________
xbox:live:gamertag -- NSA

PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:59 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

now if Bungie themselves did write the books and ILB, then I'd br upset if they started changing things... that's like Roddenberry changing Kirk's middle name from Tiberius to Jamie just for the movies... Razz
hehe
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:58 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 3 [40 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Diversions » Console/Video Game Discussion
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group