unforum

[alcofribas]

I know I'm probably stating the bleeding obvious here, but just thinking aloud and trying to recap on things that have been solved, and get into the head's of the PM's.

So far, all of the clues which have been solved and led us to the CONFER cache have been fairly straight forward (I'm not taking away from those clever people who have solved the clues - particuarly impressed with those who cracked the "Jon's eye"; 3 book safe sequence; and whoever sussed the pathway travel clues "Ibidem", "Reassuringly" etc - Slithy?)

... but all of the clues so far haven't been too obscure - especially the Fidelio and "5045" clues

.. so the Ibidem clue led us to the cache, the FR link led us to the Confer password for the changed cache.... so the changes "differences" to the Cache must matter, or why bother having a "new" cache

i know a lot of work has gone into looking into spelling discrepancies (thanks Sminky) but some people have looked into this and it appears that these have been obliterated from the old cache so perhaps we are not meant to attach any importance to these (genuine typo's which have been rectified)

therefore, the only "differences" between the old and new Caches appear to be the date changes:- (it is very possible/probable I'm wrong - if there are other changes, please correct me)


2/4 to 1/4
11/8 to 13/8
13/8 to 14/8
29/8 to 27/8
23/10 31/10

(I'm not counting the new entry of 21/12)

I don't think these dates have been changed because they were mistakes in the original Ibidem cache as other "mistakes" have been left in the Ibidem cache - eg. 5/5 - "May the Fourth be with you"

.. so why have these 5 dates been changed?

is it because, perhaps, they form some sort of password eg

2.11.13.29.23 - Ibidem or
1.13.14.27.31 - Cache

or do the entries on these dates have some particular relevance

but my own feeling is that perhaps we should just concentrate on these as otherwise there would be way too many permutations/possibilites in the Cache which doesn't seem to tie in with the way the PM's have been setting other clues.....

[bingobango]

I think your right, looking into a few possible links now.
You missed one change;
6/7 to 4/7.

[alcofribas]

thanks Bingobango

...for some reason when i copied from the wikki, I missed out 1/7 to 9/7

so there are also 2 other changes to the original ibidem cache

6/7 to 4/7 as you stated

but also there is a new entry in both caches - 8/7 - which is the link to the Bazookas site - why is this here?

although both sites now have this entry, the original ibidem site didn't !

this is doing me head in...

but I still think that our energy should be focused on the date changes - the dates themselves or the entries on those dates

2/4 to 1/4
6/7 to 4/7

8/7 in both caches - bazookas entry

11/8 to 13/8
13/8 to 14/8
29/8 to 27/8
23/10 to 31/10

passwords/relevance?

[alcofribas]

sorry if I'm being obsessive/fixated on the date change relevance, but have noticed soemething else but can't quite get my theory to work

date changes

[weave1022]

Just a thought on the August Date

[weave1022]

Just a thought on the August Date

[tinneke9]

in product description from the book on amazon,
is this mentioned

[tinneke9]

this is what happened, on the 27th of august

[bingobango]

Jon harker is mentioned on the bazookas web site, they are telling him to miss work tomorrow??.

[tinneke9]

sorry that i keep posting, i will stop for a while after this one,

but does anyone know the soap "the time tunnel" (1966)

[alcofribas]

re Krakatoa/tsunamis - it is interesting but I think too coincidental

unless S&S is real !!! and the PM's have opted for the supernatural options to predict future events

the date changes to cache were made before the terrible events of 31/12/04

also, a lot of websites state that the Krakatoa eruption took place on 26th August

so.... is there another significant interpretation of the 27/8 entry of cache?

[tinneke9]

[alcofribas]

Bingobango wrote

[tinneke9]

www.thebazookas.com/review.htm

[alcofribas]

thanks tinneke9