unforum

[gazza]

A big difference between this code and the code from Surveillance is the long string of zeros at the end of this code. I feel that we won't get far until we figure out the purpose of these zeros.

[thatslenderdude]

The only reasonable purpose of the zeros is that the number of them corasponds with a letter in the alphabet.

[sweetgums]

[tenpm]

[gazza]

I tried factorising the number, it gives me 2^13 * 5^14 * 163 * 8042182931. Surely not the right approach.

[Dr.Block]

Well, this isn't the first time TTA has shown us massive piles of 0s. As far back as Impurity long strings of 0s have been around and until now I never thought they had any real meaning.

[Zarggg]

[Bernie Buddy]

I got an idea from looking at Jay's tweets where he was cracking the other code.

I noticed three of the number pairs go in a pattern: First digit minus one.

Actually, four of them follow that pattern if you delete the 0 from the first half of the code.

37
54
65
87
98

Not sure if it's a good idea to omit the zero, though.

Edit:

The other code contained 13 number pairs which each corresponded to 2 letters of the alphabet.
This one might literally be half that; 7.5 number pairs.
The 13 zeros at the end could be entirely omitted, one of the number pairs would become a single(or separate) digit(s).
Probably the 50 at the end.

Edit:
Oh god it's 4:00 am i need to sleep

[ieisuk]

if it helps, we have 7 numbers, then a 0, then 5 letters, then 13 zeroes.

[Kraehtot]

Woah, I missed that, even if I have no idea in code cracking...

Have you thought that maybe we need another tweet/TTA's video to solve this? Well, the video thing is improbable, but it wouldn't be the first time we cannot figure out a puzzle because there are "missing parts".

Whatever, even if we have not the complete code, it looks like it would be a difficult one, and I'm thinking the equivalence of 13 numbers and 13 zeroes might be significant... TTA's seems to like pairs and symmetric things.

[Ristar]

[theonewhoquestions]

Well, the answer is most likely not "Ollie swuts ok", but thanks anyway, phone. Now we know that's what happens when I enter the data into it.

[Geneaux486]

[JustJim]

Guys, what if we just... don't solve it? Odds are the code isn't terribly important just like the last one wasn't and simply serves as a barrier before we can actually watch the video. What if we just collectively called their bluff and waited for them to put the video up anyway? I doubt Troy will sit on the video for too long regardless.

[TheJoker]