Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 15, 2024 4:50 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
[OOG] Entry Quality
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 10 of 11 [160 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
TheJoker
Entrenched


Joined: 14 May 2013
Posts: 1135
Location: Wisconsin

Fair enough. I hadn't really considered it that way. I'd say there are still ways they could believe it was someone else IG, but that makes sense.

I think, then, the reason they were never shown considering Brian might be that they only knew him pre-descent-into-madness, and when you've known and been friends with someone that long, the idea that they could have turned into the gibberish-spewing psychotic TTA might seem a little more questionable without some concrete evidence. Basically, even though they could use process of elimination to reach the idea of it being Brian, without any clues directly pointing to it being Brian and with Hoody's behavior not lining up with the Brian they knew or thought they knew, they may have simply dismissed the idea as being too silly.

Or maybe Tim never reached that conclusion simply because some part of him didn't want to consider the possibility that his best friend was the one stalking and manipulating him, and thus he never pursued that train of thought because of denial issues.

Or something.

I guess now I'm curious as to who Jay and Tim thought it was, or whether they had even really spent some time speculating as to the identity of their stalker.

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Maybe they were both convinced it was Sarah.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:46 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

Quote:
Fair enough. I hadn't really considered it that way. I'd say there are still ways they could believe it was someone else IG, but that makes sense.


There definitely are, but to me, it seems like a more extreme leap in logic. Like, if someone breaks into my house & starts leaving cryptic messages for me, my first thought isn't going to be, "Wow, how did some random stranger decide to come after me?"

Quote:
I think, then, the reason they were never shown considering Brian might be that they only knew him pre-descent-into-madness, and when you've known and been friends with someone that long, the idea that they could have turned into the gibberish-spewing psychotic TTA might seem a little more questionable without some concrete evidence. Basically, even though they could use process of elimination to reach the idea of it being Brian, without any clues directly pointing to it being Brian and with Hoody's behavior not lining up with the Brian they knew or thought they knew, they may have simply dismissed the idea as being too silly.


I rather like the way that EverymanHYBRID handled this. It was so obvious who HABIT was, but they brought up that the reason that they brought up several times that the reason why they dismissed it was because it was ridiculous & paranoid & it actually made them angry that we would even consider it. They made it really clear just how in denial the group was.

So, basically, I'm saying that I could believe that, but not if it's just sprung up on me out of nowhere. Troy, Joseph, & Tim seem to have this distressing habit of thinking that I'm some kind of mind reader.

Quote:
I guess now I'm curious as to who Jay and Tim thought it was, or whether they had even really spent some time speculating as to the identity of their stalker.


Same here. What DID they talk about while they were playing buddy cop? Or was most of it just spent in organizing tapes in uncomfortable silence?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:00 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheJoker
Entrenched


Joined: 14 May 2013
Posts: 1135
Location: Wisconsin

I somehow find the idea of the latter much funnier.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ascalondion
Decorated


Joined: 05 Dec 2013
Posts: 235
Location: Woods

Yep. Pretty much that. Ever since season 2 the characters seem to be so...idle and blank.

I really hope that we are just missing something crucial, even in #84.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:33 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

TheJoker wrote:
I somehow find the idea of the latter much funnier.


Good, that means I've done my job.

On a completely unrelated note, I just thought to wonder how Troy finds the archived footage that he uses for ToTheArk.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:53 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheManPF
Decorated


Joined: 29 Oct 2012
Posts: 191

I don't understand why Alex isn't wearing his glasses in recent entries which should have taken place in 2006, like #72 and #84, it feels weird

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Smoking_Gnu
Boot

Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 30

Lithp wrote:
On a completely unrelated note, I just thought to wonder how Troy finds the archived footage that he uses for ToTheArk.


I'm guessing as a student at a large university (or at least knowing people there now that he's graduated) he has access to quite a bit of archived footage at the campus library/film studio/intercollegiate databases, etc.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

Yeah, but does he just watch a bunch of random footage in his off-time? Does he have some kind of search strategy?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:33 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lonsumtravlr
Entrenched

Joined: 23 Mar 2014
Posts: 1009
Location: The Great Continent of New England

Lithp wrote:
Yeah, but does he just watch a bunch of random footage in his off-time? Does he have some kind of search strategy?


I wouldn't be surprised if he's adept at searching stock footage by subject matter and maybe keyword. I have no idea what sort of database or other catalog there is to search for such things, but if it's anything at all like the searches for books, journal articles, and the like, then it shouldn't be too hard to identify a necessary clip of, say, an instructional film with a young child operating a film projector or of what appears to be electroshock therapy in "Quadrant".

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lonsumtravlr
Entrenched

Joined: 23 Mar 2014
Posts: 1009
Location: The Great Continent of New England

lonsumtravlr wrote:
Lithp wrote:
Yeah, but does he just watch a bunch of random footage in his off-time? Does he have some kind of search strategy?


I wouldn't be surprised if he's adept at searching stock footage by subject matter and maybe keyword. I have no idea what sort of database or other catalog there is to search for such things, but if it's anything at all like the searches for books, journal articles, and the like, then it shouldn't be too hard to identify a necessary clip of, say, an instructional film with a young child operating a film projector or of what appears to be electroshock therapy in "Quadrant".


Then there's this, which was used in "Signal", I believe: https://archive.org/details/silent_snow_secret_snow.

EDIT: So... maybe it's a combination of browsing archive.org during the writing and flirting with an English minor as an undergrad?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

It's just that the stuff used in ToTheArk seem so random, but somehow still works. I could understand if it was mostly pulled from a certain type of footage, like old horror movies.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 8:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Sha Noran
Entrenched


Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 919

Just to jump back to what you said about the IG perspective of Hoody speculation - I disagree that Brian was ridiculously obvious. It was really much more obvious OOG due to Brian showing up at cons, and the story focusing on him a bit more than other ancillary characters. IG a conversation between Jay and Tim about Hoody's identity would have AT best been like our discussions here; analyzing what they know for sure from the found footage, proposing a possible candidate for him, then realizing they can't be sure and eventually becoming frustrated when they realize it could be ANYONE since they posted all this shit on the interenet so some crazy bastard could've hunted them down and started stalking them. I mean even here, with our heads together, with additional OOG evidence to support our theories, we can't come to agreement - even after 84 some people don't think its Brian!

Also, IG both Jay and Tim have really bad memory issues, and this would certainly strain a discussion of this sort. Imagine how many times Jay tried to ask Tim if he remembered something -ANYTHING- from his time with Hoody, some sort of clue - Tim would get sick of the query and Jay would have trouble believing him given TTA's insistence that Tim was lying. The frustration of the topic and the inevitable admittance that they had no solid proof of who it was at all probably made it a sore subject with a dead end that neither wanted to rehash after the second or third time. Tim thought it best to consider Jessica dead or "dead to him", so I feel he would think the same way about Brian and Seth due to 51 and 22 respectively.

However, finding the 84 tape ON Hoody's person and having it be what it is does indeed confirm for Tim IG that Brian is Hoody. It makes sense - Hoody definitely isn't Tim or Alex, and there's grinning ass Brian wearing the thing. Why would anyone but Brian have this tape on on their person? Also even if Tim didn't remember the events of 83, his shocked reaction to Hoody's unmasking probably fit with his reaction upon first seeing the 84 tape. Tim has no reason to wildly speculate that for some fucked up reason, Seth stole the Hoody from Brian and carried the 84 tape for misdirection of his identity. Given what Tim (and us, by extension) knows, Brian and Tim were good friends at the time. Even though it probably disturbs him to think about it, the Masky/Hoody team being Tim and Brian makes sense IG to Tim, especially given 51 (the part where Brian finds Tim at the hospital). Also 16, where he is in Brian's house as Masky to ambush Jay. Actually given Tim's history and general lack of friends, it should be painfully obvious to Tim more than anyone else that the Hooded guy he plays Masked sidekick for is logically pretty likely to be the only and best friend he ever had (prior to Jay).

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:06 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ascalondion
Decorated


Joined: 05 Dec 2013
Posts: 235
Location: Woods

You're right, we shouldn't go too far with that thought and claim that it should have been obvious IG to Tim that Hoody is Brian.
And, although this may sound strange at first, it wasn't even my concerns about Tim IG reasoning that set me off in the first place. I may have expressed it otherwise, but what I actually was criticizing the portrayal of Tim's IG reasoning. So, an OOG critic on something happening IG.

You, Sha Noran, yourself pointed out that Tim had come good reasons to infer from that tape that Hoody is Brian. Because – given the total evidence of all entries (that are also available to Tim) – it makes the most sense. There was probably some thinking happening between those sideburns. However, the video that then is uploaded gives us an hilarious reason: Brian wore a similar hoody 8 years ago, therefore, he is Hoody.

The point is, Tim probably HAD some thoughts about the fact that especially this tape was found in Hoody pocket. And that Masky and Hoody seem to get along together. And all that stuff. But, and that's now the OOG critic, from all those reasonable thought, they add the one with the hoody to the video.
Just imagine how much cooler it would have been if they had used some other reason for Tim to enter into the video, like: "Wow, given that this tape was on Hoody, he probably was Brian." That would have left the hoody Brian wore during the audition a cool thing for us to find. Some nice little detail for us to catch. But now, this nice little details is portrayed (OOG) as the main reason the (current) main character concluded (IG) the identity of a person, that was unknown for the past 42 entries. (that is almost 3 years) And that, I feel, is either fishy or bad. Fishy, because Tim has a history of ... deciding that some informations are better not known right now, and being not as truthful as he should (to be fair, Jay is very guilty of that too). Or it is bad, because there is no great "unreliable narrator" thing going on right now and Trosephim really thought that would be the best way for the total honest IG Tim to conclude things.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:57 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
twistedpuppet
Entrenched


Joined: 18 Feb 2012
Posts: 950
Location: New avatar based on art made by @TheGinky for me for my birthday.

Ascalondion wrote:


You, Sha Noran, yourself pointed out that Tim had come good reasons to infer from that tape that Hoody is Brian. Because – given the total evidence of all entries (that are also available to Tim) – it makes the most sense. There was probably some thinking happening between those sideburns. However, the video that then is uploaded gives us an hilarious reason: Brian wore a similar hoody 8 years ago, therefore, he is Hoody.



Didn't we all figure out Masky was Tim based on a jacket he wore a few years before the introduction video?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ascalondion
Decorated


Joined: 05 Dec 2013
Posts: 235
Location: Woods

twistedpuppet wrote:
Ascalondion wrote:


You, Sha Noran, yourself pointed out that Tim had come good reasons to infer from that tape that Hoody is Brian. Because – given the total evidence of all entries (that are also available to Tim) – it makes the most sense. There was probably some thinking happening between those sideburns. However, the video that then is uploaded gives us an hilarious reason: Brian wore a similar hoody 8 years ago, therefore, he is Hoody.



Didn't we all figure out Masky was Tim based on a jacket he wore a few years before the introduction video?


Yes, that almost my point. We did. Not Jay. I believe this conclusion rests on the assumption that this evidence was placed there by the makers of the series. We could conclude (although not know), that it may be important that #20 shows Tim with the exact same jacket that Masky had in #19. Again, if Tim had just not stated it in this way, I would have loved the fact that they showed Brian in this hoody. But to take this as IG evidence for an IG character to finally deduce the identity of mysterious figure that was unknown for 3 years seems jumpy to me. Hell, by that rationale Tim could have concluded after #82 that actually Jay was Hoody.

Yes, I know that there are A LOT of other facts that disprove such a theory. As well as there a A LOT of other facts (even IG) that hint towards Brian. The problem is that what Tim presents as "proof" does not work in the way he does it. In order for the footage of Brian wearing a similar hoody as Hoody to work you need more premises, more evidence. Evidence that even Tim has (though we, OOG, have more). But the way he presents his reasoning is just (and here I quote the entry): "Brian was wearing the same hoodie that day during the audition." Therefore, Hoody is Brian. QED.

And that, I believe, is wrong. Not factual wrong, but it is wrong to reason that way. I mean for all Tim knows this could also mean that Hoody stole that hoody from Brian. From "Brian was wearing the same hoodie that day during the audition." alone follows nothing. you need at least on more premise to make that work*, and Tim is presenting none. That's what's bugs me. This is so superficial reasoning, that it is either badly written, or a story device. I hope for the latter.

*Even a premise like "That hoody never changed it owner." could be contested. We don't what Hoody did all day, but some portions of those 8 years consisted in sleeping in a broken shack in the woods, running through sewers, crawling through tunnels etc. Given that, this 8 year old hoody looked pretty good in #83. I have cloth that look worse and are not that old. So from an IG point of view, such a premise would be a bit iffy.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 10 of 11 [160 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group