Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 17, 2024 4:24 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Worth a second listen
View previous topicView next topic
Page 10 of 10 [142 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 8, 9, 10 
Author Message
Motoss
Decorated


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 170
Location: Ohio

Self-Awareness doesn't not sentience make. A tiger is self-aware, but we don't classify it as a sentient creature. Why not?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kagehi Kossori
Veteran


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 75
Location: Lake Havasu AZ

The fundimental problem is that no one has a definition for sentient that is that precise. In general, it seems to imply something more like, "can think in act in ways that are noticably human, including invention and creativity". The problem is that even that is being eroded. There is really no real solid definition. In the loosest, anything self aware is sentient, in the most strict, it is anything capable of inventing and using tools. But even that definition places some species in the 'sentient' category, which could be argued to not be as sentient as we are. Like most concepts that try to create a clear deliniation between us and the rest of the universe, it fails the moment you examine it too closely. There are levels of sentience, not just, "that thing is, but that other thing isn't" and logically, there is little functional difference between the sentience of an AI, when it has human level skill, and say Steven Hawkings, who without special apperatus, also can't move or respond to the real world.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:11 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

but alas, I'm not speaking of sentience... it got to the point where we just basically for arguments' sake, assumed that an AI was as sentient as a human being. My point regarding the "this thing is and this thing isn't" is simply the fact that there is still a fundamental difference between a sentient human and a sentient AI... one is artificial, and the other is not. In that, one has Life and the other does not. (capital L is an effort to separate from the controversial definition of what comprises life, from the idea of the 'breath' of life, the spark that cannot be created that makes biological life work)

And that's what we've been discussing all these past pages Smile
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:20 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
cheebers
Boot


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 66
Location: Coeur d'Alene Idaho.

Kagehi Kossori wrote:
The fundimental problem is that no one has a definition for sentient that is that precise. In general, it seems to imply something more like, "can think in act in ways that are noticably human, including invention and creativity". The problem is that even that is being eroded. There is really no real solid definition. In the loosest, anything self aware is sentient, in the most strict, it is anything capable of inventing and using tools. But even that definition places some species in the 'sentient' category, which could be argued to not be as sentient as we are. Like most concepts that try to create a clear deliniation between us and the rest of the universe, it fails the moment you examine it too closely. There are levels of sentience, not just, "that thing is, but that other thing isn't" and logically, there is little functional difference between the sentience of an AI, when it has human level skill, and say Steven Hawkings, who without special apperatus, also can't move or respond to the real world.


Where does this notion of sentient = something involving 'invention' come from?

googling for 'dictionary sentient'
http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861717888/sentient.html
1. conscious: capable of feeling and perception
2. responding with feeling: capable of responding emotionally rather than intellectually
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=10&q=sentient
1. Having sense perception; conscious
2. Experiencing sensation or feeling.
http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary/sentient
1. able to experience physical and possibly emotional feelings:

Sentience seems to be something to do with having 'feelings' and 'emotions'. I do not think an AI, a BIT STRING is capable of feelings and emotions. So, I do not think it is sentient. Just my opinion, and apparently not shared by many people here.

As for animals, they seem to show emotion often enough. I lean towards many of them being sentient. Don't know where to draw a line though.

Obviously I am finding it difficult to come up with anything novel to say. Thanks for playing everyone. This has been very interesting. Very Happy
_________________
Mostly they only come out at night. Mostly.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

cheebers wrote:
Where does this notion of sentient = something involving 'invention' come from?

googling for 'dictionary sentient'
http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861717888/sentient.html
1. conscious: capable of feeling and perception
2. responding with feeling: capable of responding emotionally rather than intellectually
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=10&q=sentient
1. Having sense perception; conscious
2. Experiencing sensation or feeling.
http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary/sentient
1. able to experience physical and possibly emotional feelings:

Sentience seems to be something to do with having 'feelings' and 'emotions'. I do not think an AI, a BIT STRING is capable of feelings and emotions. So, I do not think it is sentient. Just my opinion, and apparently not shared by many people here.


It's definitely an interesting argument... if you think about it though, how can we define what the act of 'feeling' comprises? How do we know an AI, whic on the outside may be acting perfectly human, is not in fact 'feeling' inside? What's the definition of 'to feel' explained in a way that doesn't require being the individual in order to know? How can you prove that an AI is or isn't in fact feeling happy? How can someone else prove that you are or are not actually feeling happy? To the outside, 'happiness' is the result of a combination of physical events. But we define real emotions as more than just a chemical reaction, if we don't believe an AI can feel emotions, but only emulate them... so... how do you tell the difference between emulated emotions and real emotions?

hehe... man this is deep...
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:52 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

thebruce wrote:
Actually, I was surprised Phaedra didn't have more to say in this topic... she's left a strong impression on me from past discussions, and I was hoping she'd have some input here... but oh well Smile


Sorry that I wasn't more involved.

I was returning a bunch of long emails and doing Swag Lottery Stuff, so I really didn't think I could manage to dive headfirst into this thread and still not get fired. Sad

And once it turned into a creation vs. evolution thread, well...those discussions generally make my teeth itch.
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:50 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
urthstripe
Entrenched


Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 1113
Location: Atlanta, GA

How do you scratch itchy teeth?

Mostly, we've been making assumptions about what AI is and what it does, and we haven't even invented a true AI yet. So who knows what it's going to be like?
_________________
In this life, there are nothing but possibilities.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:02 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 10 of 10 [142 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 8, 9, 10 
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group