unforum

leakingpen · Decorated Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 187

errr

**Posted:** Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:41 pm

fimacmo · Veteran Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 136

Re: errr

**Posted:** Fri Jan 28, 2005 6:10 pm

Monkeynuts · Greenhorn Joined: 19 Oct 2004 Posts: 4 Location: hEre

**Posted:** Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:58 pm

Mike213 · Guest

Many feelings about this cursed semacode. It seems important, now doesn't it? But quite possibly it could be meaningless. . . I could just imagine the creators of PS cracking up in their chairs at the mindless effort we are putting into this. I mean, yeah, it could be important, and nothing should be ruled out. But it could possibly be a red herring, and it could possibly be somethin that CAN be deciphered, but may not be ultimately important to further our knowledge of PC/PS (such as "I can see you.")

**Posted:** Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:23 pm

Rygar · Greenhorn Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 3

Hello,

2210 seems also to be the width:height proportion of the labyrinth

On the right broader side i can measure 2.5cm (or 5cm in the zoomed image)
So , 2.5 / 10 = 0.25

0.25 * 22 = 5.5cm (or in the zoomed image 11cm)

So the proportion of the labyrinth is 22:10

The zoomed left side in height measures only 4.5cm, but the drawn line is very awry

**Posted:** Sat Jan 29, 2005 7:00 am

Alex Smith · Decorated Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 162

Re: errr

**Posted:** Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:27 am

_________________
Alex� / Proffessor of Syzygystology / Snopple

fimacmo · Veteran Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 136

There was discussion somewhere (it's all becoming a bit of a blur) as to why that method had been used to describe the object on the page. Sorry can't remember the jargon but apparently it was the inelegant way to do it. Well, that would make it noticeable, wouldn't it? Surely things are made noticeable for a reason.

My original point was that I had tried to to put those numbers through the 23 translator but because my computer is crap, I hadn't managed to get a result. Now, if no-one wants to put the numbers through, fine. I just thought it was as valuable as putting random digits in.

**Posted:** Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:36 am

Alex Smith · Decorated Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 162

However, splitting up the 221545484848465100503215 number into groups of three and creating html co-ords on the letter image, to see if the vertexes rested on letters, but nothing. In fact, one of the vertexes goes off screen.

Also tried with pp7.jpg, but to no avail. Results below.

**Posted:** Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:42 am

_________________
Alex� / Proffessor of Syzygystology / Snopple

fimacmo · Veteran Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 136

[quote="Aric's Ghost"]Just a brainstorming thought. If you view source on http://www.perplexcity.com/ and http://www.perplexcity.com/indexB.html you'll see the coordinates for the hot spot links.

The easiest method to make these graphical image maps it to make a simple square with just two coordinates. The coordinates for these pages have many more numbers.

Could the images be placed just right so the coordinates themselves are a code?quote]

Found the bit I was talking about
Fiona

**Posted:** Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:45 am

leakingpen · Decorated Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 187

thats alex (we alexs have to stick together in sanity, right!?)

and its not a simple square becasause.... the logo is a circle. just the logo is clickable, not the white space around it. definitely a preferred way (imo)

**Posted:** Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:56 pm

Seej · Unfettered Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 614

**Posted:** Mon Jan 31, 2005 5:19 am

KSG · Decorated Joined: 12 Jan 2005 Posts: 186 Location: WA, USA

It wouldn't be that difficult, if you just designed the whole image around the logo, and put the logo in place based on another layer with an outline of the coords you wanted to use. You'd probably end up with something looking like crap, though. Plus, the odds that the coords you wanted to show formed a perfect oval, instead of a big zigzag scribble, are pretty small. I'd have to agree that the odds of that image map meaning anything at all are pretty microscopic.

**Posted:** Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:36 am

Seej · Unfettered Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 614

One more method of attacking the long number that doesn't work:

Took the numbers to be pairs of coordinates (x,y), i.e. first point I plotted was at (22,15). Joined all the dots up in order. Got a meaningless shape. It wasn't even a polygon, just some lines, and they even cross over each other. Ah well, I've gotten used to my good ideas being wrong on this number by now....

**Posted:** Mon Jan 31, 2005 12:23 pm

Olorin

AAAAAARGH !

I knew 2210 was familiar.......
....it's the P.O. Box of my Bank, where I send my Credit Card payments !

........................

F.O.R.

**Posted:** Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:03 pm