Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 12, 2024 12:23 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Legend of the Sacred Urns
Can we trust Charlie?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [14 Posts]  
Author Message
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

Can we trust Charlie?

Charlie has always maintained that he played in character on the SP Forum. We were told we could trust Marlene and MTSM but nobody vouched for Charlie.

Go back to the About this Site/FAQ/Links page.
Quote:
I first discovered the Legend of the Sacred Urns a couple years ago, when a friend told me about a "wacky" old professor named "Engelbert Stein-something" who had a theory that tied together all of the world's great mysteries. Intrigued, I started to do some research on this person, but found very little on Dagobert Steinitz' academic theories -- most of the info I found involved a legendary treasure hunt he allegedly set up in the late 60's. The more I read about this mysterious professor's life and work, the more I wanted to know.
Charlie playing in character NOT telling the truth.

I am still researching here to see if we were told this or we just deduced this ourselves, but we were under the presumption that the PM's did not know the answer. Charlie's post 1/13
Quote:
From my vantage point, watching everything that went on and knowing the solution, you nailed it right here.


Anyone else with other examples?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:59 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
HaxanMike
Veteran


Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 76
Location: Brooklyn, NY

TD, we always knew the answer as we were responsible for integrating it into the narrative. What we (still) don't know is who won, how many entries, when the winning entry may have been submitted, etc.

Charlie never gave out any hints or clues -- he has always been the moderator of the forums but as a character he did not know the solution.

After the contest was over, I broke character with Charlie, first here and then in a limited way on the forums.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:18 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

HaxanMike wrote:
TD, we always knew the answer as we were responsible for integrating it into the narrative


Thanks Mike

I thought it may have been something that somewhere along the line the Forum (and I included) had just presumed but for the heck of me do you think I could find it Laughing

That still leaves the question of what really was Charlie's character. The section I quoted from the "About this site/FAQ/Links" above tends to make me lean towards a character that (putting it politely Smile ) stretches the truth a little.

Also, after re-reading the Chat, I now have some concerns about Marlene
Quote:
(23:28:37) LeedsMan: OK, one more. "Name that tune in 21 notes". Correct anagram solve? Referring to 21 letters in BETWEEN ATHENS AND CAIRO?
(23:29:20) HaxanMike: LeedsMan, I actually don't remember what that was -- you'll have to ask Brian!
(23:29:27) HaxanMike: definitely a red herring though
(23:29:37) bigmattyh: a red herring!!!
(23:29:38 ) HaxanMike: because the real clues all came from PMN
(23:29:42) bigmattyh: man, and it came from marlene!


Does this mean that the additional letters from the Opera Game
Quote:
O (KT) ITAREXHEWT
are or may be important?

Please Note: I have edited out some lines in the Chat quote above. They did not appear to relate to the point being made at that point of time (i.e just Chit Chat). I have done my best to keep the integrity of the conversation but I may have inadvertently edited out some of the important comments. If so, just let me know. Thanks (sounds like the lawyers have been here too)
Smile

PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:57 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
RobDixon
Boot


Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 41
Location: San Rafael, California

TheDom,

I know you and a few of us others speculated about Charlie's motives during the puzzle.

I thought it was interesting that the webmaster of the official puzzle forum was an in-story character. As I mentioned in one post:

Quote:
As a character, Charlie probably has similar motivations to the rest of the them: to find the urns. What better way than starting a message board about the hunt and learning from everyone else's speculation about the clues?


They never really used this angle though. It would have been cool (in a perverse sort of way) if we could have learned that Charlie was withholding info, or even misdirecting people, because he wanted to get to the urns first himself!

I think that this was a twist they didn't implement though. For the most part, Charlie's posts seemed to be straightforward, as Mike has implied.

Still, what a mind-twister that would have been...

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
HaxanMike
Veteran


Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 76
Location: Brooklyn, NY

RobDixon wrote:
I think that this was a twist they didn't implement though. For the most part, Charlie's posts seemed to be straightforward, as Mike has implied.

Still, what a mind-twister that would have been...


This was discussed and it was something we would have done had we needed it, but we felt that there were enough red herrings already out and creating havoc for you guys!

Good call, RD.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:37 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

I'm glad

I trusted Charlie without question and I would have been very shocked to discover he was deviously misleading us. That was one twist I am glad you didn't add in.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:09 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

HaxanMike wrote:
Charlie never gave out any hints or clues -- he has always been the moderator of the forums but as a character he did not know the solution.

Mike, I agree totally, through the whole forum Charlie was most definitely straight up.

What I am also looking at is the prelude pages or the "Steinitz Puzzlers: Chronicling the Search for the Sacred Urns" pages. These pages shown inconsistency with Charlie in the Forum.

Mike, if you are able to answer, I would like to ask who wrote the following prelude pages:
    a. Home
    b. Dagobert Steinitz
    c. The Legend of the Sacred Urns
    d. Early Searches for the Urns
    e. First Urn Found!
    f. The Hunt for the Remaining Urns
    g. Steinitz' Unified Theory
    h. About this Site / FAQ / Links

I would also like to know the writer's involvement with Paul Hoffman at the time of writing the pages i.e. were the pages written under Paul Hoffman's direct guidance or not.

PERSONAL NOTE TO RobD:
Don't go giving them any ideas. People already think we are nuts thinking that the "bigger picture" is not yet over. If they had taken that approach (and as you can see they thought about doing it Twisted Evil ) then we all would have ended up certifiable.
Shocked Silly Laughing Shocked Silly

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
HaxanMike
Veteran


Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 76
Location: Brooklyn, NY

TD,

Nothing was written under direct supervision of Paul Hoffman. Paul was given everything to read but never made any changes. Once he gave us the clues to stick into the story it was pretty much up to us to integrate them.

All of the copy of steinitzpuzzlers was written by Jim Gunshanan -- it was not divided up amongst multiple writers. Jim wrote everything except PMN journals, which were all written by Mary Johnson.

Jim played NDN and Charlie Tan through November and maybe even into December (can't recall offhand) and then I took over Charlie Tan.

I played MTSM.

The overall story was hammered out in a room over a couple of days by myself, Gregg Hale, Andy Carrigan, Brian Clark, and Paul Hoffman, and then I essentially produced it with Darren Himebrook and attempted to direct it when I had time.

It was a busy time, to say the least!

There are many inconsistencies, mainly due to the rushed production time. Frankly, it's a miracle it even makes sense at all considering how quickly it was all put together!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:25 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

Quote:
There are many inconsistencies, mainly due to the rushed production time. Frankly, it's a miracle it even makes sense at all considering how quickly it was all put together!


Jim Miller wrote in this excellent article:

Quote:
In events like Exocog, players scan the content of in-game Web sites with amazing care, in search of clues about how the game will proceed.


So making a game is like publishing a book and finding yourself with thousands of intense proofreaders. Smile
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:06 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

HaxanMike wrote:

It was a busy time, to say the least!

There are many inconsistencies, mainly due to the rushed production time. Frankly, it's a miracle it even makes sense at all considering how quickly it was all put together!


Mike

Thanks for the response. Sorry I have been "off the air" for 10 days (DSL line problems).

I think you guys did a great job, so please do not take anything I am saying here as being an attack on the job that you guys did.

Personally, I am not a great believer in co-incidences and there are just way too many "co-incidences" in the puzzle for me to believe they were not placed there by design.

Just one of those "co-incidences", the rlebron/Leeds Site containing a picture of Cedar Grove, Thomas Cole's home with the caption
Quote:
This pic came out kind of fuzzy...but then again, the memories are too...

From what I can ascertain, this house in not in the same "immediate" vicinity as the other pictures (yes, it is in the Hamlet of Leeds but not immediately near the church etc) and it's "kind of fuzzy".

Mike, what I would like to ask is the following.

Do you know or think that:
  • there COULD BE a "bigger" puzzle
  • there IS a "bigger" puzzle
  • there WAS a "bigger" puzzle but due to certain factors was "toned down" to the rlebron/Leeds solution
  • the "co-incidences" are just "co-incidences" and were not designed by anyone to be part of the puzzle
  • I don't really know
  • I am not legally allowed to say
  • Other response (please elaborate)
I hope you can or are able to respond to this question.

Thanks
Confused

PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
HaxanMike
Veteran


Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 76
Location: Brooklyn, NY

TD,

The memorial site at Leeds was ALWAYS the solution. The rlebron site was put up because after the puzzle was developed, the lawyers said it had to be an entirely online treasure hunt, meaning the solution had to be something that someone could find sitting at home in front of their computer.

The solution was NEVER changed -- the only thing that changed was now you could find it online instead of having to physically go there.

I do not think there is a larger puzzle. I KNOW that there is no larger puzzle in the story/mythology/steinitz sites because we developed all of that. Whether Paul hid other puzzles in his puzzles and didn't tell us I cannot say, but if that is the case then all you have to do is look at the solution as I posted it in the steinitzpuzzlers forum, as that was almost entirely taken from the document Paul supplied us with, word for word.

Those things you mention ARE coincidences, as Darren went to Leeds to take the photos, but Jimmy G actually wrote the captions and he has never been to Leeds. He had no idea of the spatial relationships of anything in the picture.

Even putting "Urn is here" was Paul's idea. We thought it was better to hide it in the caption rather than come right out and say it.

I think you're barking up the wrong tree looking for a bigger puzzle, unfortunately.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 9:48 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

HaxanMike wrote:
I think you're barking up the wrong tree looking for a bigger puzzle, unfortunately.


Mike, I tend to agree with you, which is a shame.

Why I was interested was not because I can/could not accept the rlebron/Leeds solution because that solution "was what it was" and nothing else, but more from the fact that so many more "coincidences" led away from that site.

If you follow the answer I posted and then read this article on the Kogi Tribe particularly following the link to Drunvalo Melchizedek's article you will see huge "coincidences" with the puzzle and the story/mythology/steinitz sites.

These coincidences (to me) actually provided an answer to
Quote:
Who did Steinitz believe had come for him? Did one of the Nanahsnug's Sun-Gods "phase" into his bedroom? Was this entity responsible in some way for his bizarre death? These are puzzles that, unfortunately, will probably never be solved.

That is why I was interested in who wrote which pages etc. and under whose direction.

The shame appears to be that there was/is no "larger" puzzle as you could imagine the fun trying to work out where to post/log the answer and if there was any reward or prizes involved. Laughing

Thanks for your help mate, as I said "great fun".

P.S. Mike, just for my interest only, were you or Jimmy playing the role of Charlie back on Dec 9th when I PM'd this
Quote:
Charlie

Please do not respond to this PM but I would like to submit the following (Note - I am not, or will not be registering) just for fun:

SIERRA NEVADA DE SANTA MARTA

Anogram:
A VIE DRAMA END, A SANTA ARREST

Even if it is not correct then it is funny.

P.S. So I do not go totally nuts. I know I saw that Batman picture before (and no I did not search any blogs). After the puzzle has finished, if you happen to know where, please let me know.

P.P.S. Thanks... this has been fun... lots More Grey Hairs To See

Talk about coincidences, running into that Batman picture twice. Once via a Google search (see Google finds all the wrong things Rolling Eyes) and the other time it being the Blog numbered one before the rlebron Blog. Laughing

PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

HaxanMike wrote:
Whether Paul hid other puzzles in his puzzles and didn't tell us I cannot say, but if that is the case then all you have to do is look at the solution as I posted it in the steinitzpuzzlers forum, as that was almost entirely taken from the document Paul supplied us with, word for word.

Could be an interesting question to ask Paul.

Has there been any progress/news on the potential "chat" session?

Cool

PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:19 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheDom
Boot


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 15

HaxanMike wrote:
I do not think there is a larger puzzle. I KNOW that there is no larger puzzle in the story/mythology/steinitz sites because we developed all of that. Whether Paul hid other puzzles in his puzzles and didn't tell us I cannot say, but if that is the case then all you have to do is look at the solution as I posted it in the steinitzpuzzlers forum, as that was almost entirely taken from the document Paul supplied us with, word for word.

Mike

The more I look at this, the more I am perplexed by the "final" solution.

From the final answer:
Quote:
We know from the first and second urn puzzles that geographical references can't be taken at face value. Oakland referred not to the city in California but to a town in Nebraska, and Hastings wasn't the one in England but in Michigan. Thus we should assume the same for Athens and Cairo. It turns out that these are two towns in mid state New York, and we are looking for a location between them

The second urn was not found in "Oakland" rather the red purse with the pi coin and the note providing the final clue leading to the second urn
Quote:
"You're near the end but it's not here, head for two rivers with your scuba gear."

The second urn was actually found at
Quote:
intersection of the Iowa and Little Sioux Rivers
a non-existent geographical reference.

By following the same principals used in finding the second urn then for the third urn, the Leeds site should have been the "red herring site" (i.e. Oakland) which contained clues to the final solution.

To me, and this is my opinion only, this either has been a major oversight by Paul or there is a larger puzzle. One of the two, and that is what I am trying to work out.

Has there been any further progress on the potential "chat" session with Paul?

P.S. I still agree that I could be barking up a wrong tree Surprised but who knows?........Paul does!

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:43 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [14 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Legend of the Sacred Urns
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group