Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 15, 2024 1:33 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Diversions » Perplex City Puzzle Cards » PXC: Silver Puzzle Cards
[puzzle] Silver - #248 - Differently Lethal
Moderators: AnthraX101, bagsbee, BrianEnigma, cassandra, Giskard, lhall, Mikeyj, myf, poozle, RobMagus, xnbomb
View previous topicView next topic
Page 10 of 14 [200 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
Hobbess
Kl00


Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 42
Location: Glasgow

Just to carry on the fails!

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
no to RNA, sex lethal (something to do with RNA) and protein


All the graphing etc looks great above, had tried something on paper but not to the same effect. Essentially all WAY over my head Shocked so continuing to trawl google for anything that looks even remotely close.

My thoughts are that the picture is pretty theoretical, haven't found anything on the web that looks as clear as this, certainly in terms of x-ray cyrstallography.

I know a few folk have mentioned getting in touch with experts, as this yielded anything. Not the best time of year I guess to get folk though.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:51 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
step
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 119
Location: Boston-ish

I've been reading up on all this stuff for the past few days and it seems that this may be a Patterson map.

You can read about these here, here, and here. Also this applet has 2 example pattersons, with the 2nd being fairly similar to the pattern on this card

Assuming this theory is correct, with a bit of work we should be able to work out the number and position of atoms in a unit cell; which should help narrow down the list of candidate substances.
_________________
Every step 3 brings with it new perspectives.
[Synagoga Nick: Puppy, Team Tollin, CoD: Stephen7]


PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:49 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Fuseunderground
Decorated

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 151

Apologies if I repeat other people's info,
It's just that I think it could be so close,
I wanted to state what I think we can say about the substance.

BTW this is far from my field, but I managed to talk to someone who knew
a bit about it, and they pointed me in the right direction.
(and I am still assuming the answer is the name of the substance)

It is Def. a diffraction pattern 99% sure it's X-ray
Using notes here (particularly handout 2)
http://matsci.uah.edu/CourseWare/mts721/

We can say:
It is inorganic
It is a single crystal
It is Monoclinic
There are no mirror planes (so maybe the hall of mirrors refers simply to a crystal)
It appears to be made up of at least 5 elements
Its Space group must satisfy L=2n as the separations are multiples of 2

The Beta angle cannot be at 90
Which it does not appear to be as illustrated in patternnotes.jpg
Note also the distinction that there is nothing at -10-4 or 104 which will help distinguish it from other members of its space group.

If we identify which Space group it is in we can narrow down the search
Someone may be able to confirm it on this site:
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/SYMMETRY/3dSpaceGrps/3DSPGR010-015.HTM

The Beta angle appears at about 95 degrees, though due to the symmetry
it must actually be a different value (possibly 85 [180-95])

Searching on http://www.crystallography.net/
with an angle of 85 gives only 1 result, at this point I thought I had found something significant, as other angles give hundreds of results, but I cannot identify the substance.
It has a formula H 8 O 12 S 2 K 2 Mn 1 Any ideas?

I was really hoping it would be 'Cryptomelane' but alas not accepted.

Out of interest, drawing this chemical and giving it's powder diffraction results (the other 3 attached images) show a fairly similar pattern to the card.

I'm not saying it is this chemical, but it does have many aspects that fit to what we know.

Bearing in mind I hadn't heard of X-ray crystallography a week ago,
everything I have just said may be absolute rubbish,
but even so it might prompt someone who does know what they are talking about to find the answer.

Thanks for listening... Wink [/img]
patternnotes.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   171.07KB
 Viewed   148 Time(s)

patternnotes.jpg

1011041.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   101.35KB
 Viewed   111 Time(s)

1011041.jpg

1011041_2.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   33.81KB
 Viewed   120 Time(s)

1011041_2.jpg

1011041_Powder.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   42.11KB
 Viewed   121 Time(s)

1011041_Powder.jpg


PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Stiltskin
Greenhorn

Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Location: England

I've not got the card, but reading through this one (as cipher of history is driving me nuts), has anyone tried radiation as an answer?

It seems to be differently lethal, as it can create cancer as well as kill it. Also the pictures shows X-Ray diffraction, a type of radiation. And finally my reasoning that the clue - a deadly hall of mirrors - has been used to describe the cold war, where both sides needed the same number of nuclear weapons.

Anyway just my tuppence worth...

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:22 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
ALISDAIRPARK
Unfictologist


Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 1646
Location: Everywhere else

that was a good suggestion Stiltskin, but I can confirm it failed.

Incidentally Sherbet, could you update your list if you're still about? I would copy and update myself, but it seems a little daft having another list, thanks.
_________________
Absorb what is useful <> Reject what is not <> Add what is uniquely your own
Playing : http://cerebrumachine.com and http://www.westunfictionopia.info

My charity page: http://www.justgiving.com/alisdairpark3


PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:36 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SteveC
Unfettered


Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 381

Beginning to think I'll have to join the ranks of those nigh on ignoring the clue now, so how about my random guess, Methamphetamine, anyone wanna try it?

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 6:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ALISDAIRPARK
Unfictologist


Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 1646
Location: Everywhere else

Fuseunderground, lots of good stuff in there -

Is the first image one from a site, or your scan? If it's an image from elsewhere it looks like a match to me...

Also the substance you mention is Leonite, but I can't see any link to either Differently Lethal, or Hall of Mirrors
_________________
Absorb what is useful <> Reject what is not <> Add what is uniquely your own
Playing : http://cerebrumachine.com and http://www.westunfictionopia.info

My charity page: http://www.justgiving.com/alisdairpark3


PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:16 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Uhtoff
Veteran

Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 75

As for the radiation idea I tried both Xrays and X-rays, of course from the same concept as Polar I guess I should have tried Xray and X-Ray too...

EDIT - Done it, no dice.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
GasparLewis
Unfettered


Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 474
Location: vicinty of NYC

You see, what Fuse got is exactly what we needed: cold hard analysis.

Now, if we take what we've deduced to another person with crystallography know-how, we may very well derive an answer.

I know it's a little base of me, but I always feel better when I see graphs and images; the reorganization of the data always seems to shed new light, you know?

Guess all you like in the interim, but try and fit it within what we have at least. A guess-fest without any clues is only a wild goosechase (like I said on page... 6, was it?)

So, cheers to Space and Fuse for pushing us along in the right direction and making very pretty pictures! Very Happy

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:32 am
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Stiltskin
Greenhorn

Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Location: England

ALISDAIRPARK wrote:

Also the substance you mention is Leonite


Leonite contains Magnisium (Mg) nor Manganese (Mn) so that isn't the mineral he described.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:08 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Uhtoff
Veteran

Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 75

To add to Fuse's analysis as it has no mirror symmetry it 'should' be a sphenoidal monoclinic crystal. Out of interest pretty much all arsenic salts are sphenoidal monoclinic crystals.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Fuseunderground
Decorated

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 151

In response to ALISDAIRPARK,
The first image is an image of the card, with notes added to point out important features,
It is not from another site, I haven't been able to find any galleries of images similar to the card, anyone else?

It is almost certainly not that compound I said before,
I just used it as an example, to illustrate that when we can state the Beta angle (to do with reflection) and the space group,
we should be able to identify the substance.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ALISDAIRPARK
Unfictologist


Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 1646
Location: Everywhere else

Stiltskin
Quote:
Leonite contains Magnisium (Mg) nor Manganese (Mn) so that isn't the mineral he described


There are different forms of leonite

See here:http://www.crystallography.net/ where 3 forms have Manganese.

or here: www.minsocam.org/MSA/AmMin/TOC/Abstracts/ 2001_Abstracts/Oct01_Abstracts/Hertweck_p1282_01.pdf

or here: http://www.extenza-eps.com/OLD/doi/abs/10.1524/zkri.218.6.403.20724

etc. etc. etc.
_________________
Absorb what is useful <> Reject what is not <> Add what is uniquely your own
Playing : http://cerebrumachine.com and http://www.westunfictionopia.info

My charity page: http://www.justgiving.com/alisdairpark3


PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:14 pm
Last edited by ALISDAIRPARK on Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sherbet
Boot

Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 20

alisdair, ive been away with the fairies, only checking in to see if theres been a solve, not done any new attempts myself, but ill update the list asap, and ill try and do columns again, if itll let me this time! Rolling Eyes

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:15 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ALISDAIRPARK
Unfictologist


Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 1646
Location: Everywhere else

Thanks Sherbet, did you have fun with the the fairies?
_________________
Absorb what is useful <> Reject what is not <> Add what is uniquely your own
Playing : http://cerebrumachine.com and http://www.westunfictionopia.info

My charity page: http://www.justgiving.com/alisdairpark3


PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 10 of 14 [200 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Diversions » Perplex City Puzzle Cards » PXC: Silver Puzzle Cards
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group