Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 19, 2024 9:12 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: MetaCortechs » MetaCortechs: General/Updates
[SPEC] Relativity to the Matrix
View previous topicView next topic
Page 5 of 6 [86 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
ecwilder
Guest


hey.. guys... there seems to be time discrepencies?

if you read some of the fiction on whatisthematrix.com... one of them is about a pilot the machines 'raise' by speeding up time in the matrix...

they effectively give him like 5 lifes in 5 minutes, training him to be the best pilot ever, and then they leave him in space (in the 'real' world) to die (read the story to find out why)... but while in space they plug him back into the matrix, and he lives like 50 years in those 5 minutes of oxygen he has left..

so... thats why even tho it was 1999, and now its 2003, and we know neo was only unplugged for 6 months... that it doesnt matter. they sped up time ... those 6 months=the 2 years we lived.

Very Happy make sensE? it does to me, and thats all that matters Wink

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:00 pm
 Back to top 
Omnie
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 772

chacko wrote:
There was "Galvatrons" robot theory that said amongst the three primary directives of every machine is "Don't destroy humans". So that could be why?


Yeah, those three Laws of Robotics were created by Isaac Asimov (very famous sf writer) back in, I think, the 1950s. They appeared in Bicentennial Man (which is based on a story written by him) as a tribute, if you saw that. Very Happy Anyway, I don't think the machines have those built in, at least not in the sense that Asimov meant, because if they did, they would not be able to hurt humans at all, and would self-destruct before doing so. However, I think there's an alternative explanation that could still involve those laws. In Asimov's universe (yes, I am a big fan of his, can you tell?), some very advanced robots formulated the Zeroth Law for themselves, which reads something like:
"A robot will not harm humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm."
This law takes precedence over the First Law, which involves protecting *individual* humans. So maybe the machines in the Matrix universe have some version of this law (that they probably came up with independently) that drives them to try to save humanity, regardless of the individual humans that they kill (over a million Zion residents, and all the "crops" that were lost, not to mention the casualties of the war). I can see how a machine would take the purely logical view, looking at the overall big picture to decide what's best for humanity. Why do they want to preserve humanity? Well...we are their creators. To study us, if for no other reason. Does this make sense?

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:01 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
ecwilder
Guest


just for the record thats the coolest story on the site.... ill letcha know what happens... the machines are being attacked by an alien race, and so they train this pilot to be the one to go up and kill their mothership...

while the aliens are attacking tho, some matrix servers go offline and everyone inside is standing in the construct clueless for a few minutes, then it all goes back online... its cool.

at any rate, no point to this other than say I LOVED this story, go read it.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:03 pm
 Back to top 
chacko
Veteran

Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 74
Location: Windsor, CO

I always wondered if time was relevant in the Matrix. If Neo could be jacked in for 3 seconds to master kung fu... ? Smile
_________________
Wise man say, "Idle hands do no work."

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:07 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Omnie
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 772

Anonymous wrote:
Omnie wrote:


Heh...I doubt you are being serious, but...exactly. That's why all of humanity won't wake up. They aren't ready. It's why they are in the Matrix in the first place...and why TMO will continue the story. That's the most logical way for the series to end. And it kind of is true...I'm taking a history class now that goes beyond what they print in history textbooks, and our species is just disgusting...with a very few redeeming moments every once in a while.

And, for the record (is anyone keeping a record? I hate that phrase...why do I use it then?), I really don't believe that the movies will end with anything like Zion=a Matrix or Neo waking up at his computer, for multiple reasons, but if we start a MWAM (matrix within a matrix, for those who aren't hardcore Matrix fans;)) debate on this thread...well, let's just say I don't want to be responsible for starting it. Very Happy Heehee...



indeed. Very Happy but which to respond to first:
I'm keeping the record. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy ! (ok im not, loved your comment tho).

to save humanity IS, IMHO (figured what it meant finally thru some logic)!, the reason the machines put us in the matrix. They dont need us, they have infinate lifespans, infinate technology, and can no doubt just skyrocket themselves into space, surround the sun w/ solar panels, and harness tons of energy. Not to mention a 'perfect' machine mind could no doubt make easy work of nuclear technology.

and to save humanity will be the reason we stay in the matrix.

oh, and a MWAM, .... i think the WB, and nearly every other moviewatcher in the world has saw the Wizard of Oz, and know what a complete cop out ending it is....
ive taken many fiction writing classes in college, my teachers always shouted that NEVER make your story a dream... it makes all the work the reader just did , all the time he spent, a complete waste.... it ruins the stories. i think the WB have a little intelligence and wont ruin their fanbase.

but then again, this is all.... IMHO. (let me just be sure, it means In My Humble Opinion, correct? Very Happy)


Yep, it does mean that. Very Happy Hmm...actually, I dunno if anyone cares, but my primary reason for dismissing MWAM is that it makes no sense on the symbolic/figurative level.
Message of M1: question reality, free your mind, etc...
Message of M2: Hmm, that's a bit tougher, but has to do with control, free will, predestination, choice, messiah figures and religion, etc, etc...
If MWAM is true, message of M3: question reality, free your mind.

See my point? Makes no sense...we get it already, no need to beat us over the head with the same message. It's just digging the movies deeper into a hole, and would basically make the sequals pointless. I have confidence that the WBs can think of a new and more interesting point to make with the final installment of this trilogy. My proof? Look at the themes of M2. Very different from M1 - they are expanding outward, and there is every reason to believe that they will continue to do so. Very Happy

And I'm sure no one really wanted to read that, lol...sorry.
Mr. Green <--this smiley is called Mr. Green. How very cool is that?!?

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:10 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
chacko
Veteran

Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 74
Location: Windsor, CO

I just read that story, I feel sorry for the guy Sad

Seems like the machines are very communistic. I wonder if maybe his ship will have fallen out of orbit back onto earth and maybe that brief sequence of seeing the sky in the Revolutions trailer they'll show his ship!
_________________
Wise man say, "Idle hands do no work."

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:47 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Scotty
Guest


Respect.

We arent just batteries, maybe we are a good reserve but not the primary power imo. Why they keep us alive maybe an act of respect. We were their creators and then keeping our minds alive is the least they can do. Smile

Bless all forms of intelligence.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:29 pm
 Back to top 
Azathoth666
Unfettered

Joined: 09 Oct 2003
Posts: 321
Location: OZ-tralia

[EDIT] this is a bit of a catch up post, rambling between Smith and the whole power thing... sort of... Wink

Yeah, comping from an IS perspective, the only way to kill Smith is to
take the Matrix offline, and rebuild the server.

Of course, then everyone plugged into the Matrix dies or wakes up, because the dream is offline... which means the machines lose their power source (or computing cluster or whatever we really are to them), so potentially everyone is dead except for the people in Zion... and even so, the machines probably have enough standby charge to take Zion out before they go down too.

Remember that in Revolutions the Architect doesn't tell Neo they don't need humans for power: he tells him that there are levels of existance they are prepared to accept: The machines will quite happily take all unneccessary systems off the power grid until the mainframes (running off UPS, or charge or whatever) sort out what the hell to do... but it's a lose-lose situation in that case.

And I'm not sure killing Bane will take Smith out either: think of it in these terms: you have ten computers in a room, all networked. One computer has a virus, which spread to 8 of the other computers in the room (leaving one uninfected). The only way to stop that virus spreading to the last computer is by shutting down all of the others: I think if you kill Bane, Smith loses one Smith, but no biggie... in the park scene in Revolutions theres at least half a dozen that aren't moving by the time Neo is done with them...

What the machines need to do is build a program inside the Matrix called Norton...

("thank you! thank you! I'm here 'till Thursday! Try the Veal!")

Very Happy
_________________
We don't stop playing because we grow old.
We grow old because we stop playing.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Giskard
Sassypants


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 2066
Location: Chicago

Omnie wrote:

Yeah, those three Laws of Robotics were created by Isaac Asimov (very famous sf writer) back in, I think, the 1950s. They appeared in Bicentennial Man (which is based on a story written by him) as a tribute, if you saw that. Very Happy Anyway, I don't think the machines have those built in, at least not in the sense that Asimov meant, because if they did, they would not be able to hurt humans at all, and would self-destruct before doing so. However, I think there's an alternative explanation that could still involve those laws. In Asimov's universe (yes, I am a big fan of his, can you tell?), some very advanced robots formulated the Zeroth Law for themselves, which reads something like:
"A robot will not harm humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm."
This law takes precedence over the First Law, which involves protecting *individual* humans.


Wow, nice Asimov tie-in... I doubt that the Matrix storyline would involve something as idealistic as the Three (actually Four) Laws of Robotics, but still the idea is great. (I'm also a huge Asimov-fan, as anyone that has read a few of his books would have guessed when looking at my nickname Wink -- I'd wish someone would take it upon himself to film his Robot/Foundation cycle of novels in a Matrix meets LOTR kinda way... now that would be cool Smile )

This thread is getting rather off-topic though, I'm still conservative in linking stuff happening in the Metacortechs ARG "environment" too directly to the Matrix-storyline or characters, because no direct links have been established past the name of the company.

Don't get me wrong, I really do think this thing is closely related to the Matrix and probably the W. bros., I just find posts like "wow! Marcus Ormond must really be the Merovingian!" rather irrelevant at this stage of the game. My bet is still that the story around MetaCortechs revolves around something either happening exclusively INSIDE the Matrix (and separate from what happened in the movies, namely Reloaded), but maybe even more likely BEFORE the Matrix...

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:49 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
ecwilder
Guest


giskard: its kinda dumb to assume its pre-matrix.... look at Cascade Vortex. hmmm..... 100% without a doubt in my mind this arg takes place w/in the matrix.

and yes, yes, yes azaroth, if you can program an AI to understand and empathize w/ every human (the mother of the matrix..... Persephone), then i think you can create an AI named NORTON. Very Happy

( for the record i LOVE it when the architect leads neo (the architects a machiveli!) 'she would undoubtedly be the mother of the matrix.... " the oracle?" (and my fave line:) 'PLEASE' ... (he just tosses the idea aside its great))

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 8:48 pm
 Back to top 
Skelator
Kilroy

Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 1

First: Places like the cascade vortex exist. I went to one it was trippy.

Second: Just to get those who dont know straight about this. I think it would be unlikely for humans nto to build a clause like this into any AI.

Laws of Robotics

First Law:

A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

Second Law:

A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

Third Law:

A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Third: The city Neo lives and works in is meant to resemble chicago, but not BE chicago.

Forth: I think the best theory as to the ending of the matrix is the whole
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
The end of M1 is end of series due to significant time lapse displayed on trace program screens in first and last scenes.


Fifth: Brave New World and the Matrix are nearly identical stories. It's kinda scary. The clincher in my mind is that people who realize their lack of freedom in the brave new world state are exiled to islands where only the best and brightest are allowed to go. It is used as a way of getting trouble makers out of the way so they dont disrupt society.

Finnally: Yeah, I question too wether this ARG has any relevence to the matrix. It all seems too unpolished and a bit unprofessional. There aren't any big matrix/W. Bros. Trademarks as of yet. We'll see and I'll definetly keep following it but ..."I'm just sayin!"

Whew! That that catches me up on all the disscussion here.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 9:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Dr Wily
Boot

Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 43

Skelator wrote:
Places like the cascade vortex exist. I went to one it was trippy.


They do exist, but they're easily debunked. Learn more:

http://www.sandlotscience.com/MysterySpots/MysterySpots.htm

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:08 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Omnie
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 772

Hehe, to answer some of the points...Very Happy

Yep, it's unlikely that we'll ever build the Laws into our AIs, but that's because we're stupid and will probably end up exterminating ourselves sometime soon. lol, maybe that's the moral of the Matrix! At the end, the three laws scroll down the screen... heehee, that'd be great. Protect thyself or else!

Your theory about the ending of Rev just doesn't agree with what's been released about Revolutions:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
at some point in the Superbrawl, Smith and Neo fight on the corner where he originally made that final phone call, and they reduce the intersection to rubble.


Therefore, no [M1 ending = M3 ending]. Also, that has the same flaw as the MWAM theory - it makes no figurative sense. I predict that Rev will not have that kind of "trick" twist at all. The twist, as it is, will probably be something far deeper, that'll give everyone that kind of "oh....!" moment (sort of like I got when I saw Neo stop the sentinels, except far cooler).

I just noticed that I keep forgetting that I'm on an ARG forum, and just keep talking about the Matrix...lol, is it just that all the threads I reply to have already gone off-topic? Yeah, that's gotta be it...not my fault at all. Very Happy

On another related point, Persephone is so not the mother of the Matrix. Very Happy Warning, heavy Revolutions spoiler ahead:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
I solemnly predict that the honor will belong to "Sita," Rama Kandra's wife. Evidence = Hinduism. Also, it makes so much sense that the mother, an intuitive program that's made to understand humans, would create the first "child" of the machines out of love...


Greek mythology gives us no reason to believe that about Persephone. My version (which is very spoiler-heavy, sorry!) makes quite a bit more sense, I think. Not to mention that it's also really elegant, the kind of thing the WBs would do.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:20 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Guest
Guest


Silly people. This isn't an official Matrix game. The content will only be as relevant to the Matrix as the PM's can make it without being sued; which is to say, the content won't be very relevant to the Matrix at all. The PM's have used your fervor for all things Matrix to suck you into their game. They gave you a slice of carrot and you are trying to make a stew out of it. Ethical considerations aside, it's a ballsy and, obviously, successful tactic.

As long as you keep trying to force game information into the Matrix paradigm, you'll keep drawing blanks. This thread should be changed to [Off Topic].

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:26 pm
 Back to top 
Azathoth666
Unfettered

Joined: 09 Oct 2003
Posts: 321
Location: OZ-tralia

There's no need for this thread to be changed: it's all [SPEC]ulation about how (if) this ARG relates to the matrix.

Undeniable parallels can be drawn, in terms of mood, litereary influence etc...

The consesnsus seems to be swinging beind the "this isn't an official..." camp. So what? Is it enjoyable? Yes. Have I nearly torn my hair out over the complexity of it? Several times.

When you look at it in the context of the greater "Matrix Universe", irrespective if Warner Bros or the WBs rubber-stamped it, does it "fit"?

I think so.

We haven't drawn blanks too often in the past: sure we've hit walls for a while here and there, but in general the amount of effort poured into solving the puzzles has been phenomenal, and everyone involved deserves a big old pat on the back, IMHO.

I don't feel duped or angry or mislead if it isn't an official game. It works. Thats what's important.

Sorry for the rant... just thought I'd contribute. Smile
_________________
We don't stop playing because we grow old.
We grow old because we stop playing.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 6 [86 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: MetaCortechs » MetaCortechs: General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group