Author
Message
eeeqz
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 104 Location: Leics/Kingston upon Thames
Uhtoff wrote:
Possible inhaled toxins include phosgene, ozone, chlorine , Teflon fumes, nitrogen dioxide and smoke.
I don't know much about medical matters, but I do watch too many films (and wrestling...) - is chlorine what baddies (hehe) put on handkerchiefs and then over people's mouths to knock them out? Or have I got it confused?
_________________
Quot Homines Tot Sententiae...
Proud member of the Caine Johannson Dream Team Fan Club
http://www.perplexcitytrades.com/eeeqz
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:54 am
maevey
Veteran
Joined: 21 Dec 2005 Posts: 106
Nope, that's chloroform.
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:57 am
eeeqz
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 104 Location: Leics/Kingston upon Thames
Lol I knew it began with Chl! OK back to the drawing board...
_________________
Quot Homines Tot Sententiae...
Proud member of the Caine Johannson Dream Team Fan Club
http://www.perplexcitytrades.com/eeeqz
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:03 am
Uhtoff
Veteran
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 75
Chlorine is what they put in swimming pools to make your eyes red (and kill germs of course...). Total aside, I once sat down with one of my consultants to work out whether you really could use chloroform on a hanky to knock someone out and you can, although it would likely take a fair bit longer than it's depicted as taking in most films...see, anaesthesia is fun.
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:54 am
European Chris
Unfictologist
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: London's trendy Whitechapel
How long?
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:57 am
sledgecallier
Unfettered
Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 414 Location: Behind the Sofa...
The problem we have here, as I see it, is that as Ceretin is an unknown drug in this world we have no base line as to the state of a body that has been ingesting the stuff for many a year. It could be that fluid in the lungs etc is normal for a Ceretin addict. (I know this is highly unlikely, but just trying to illustrate the point...)
_________________
SledgeCallier.
'We're gonna need a bigger boat!'
My cards to trade at Perplexcitytrades
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:39 am
Uhtoff
Veteran
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 75
/em wonders why Chris is so interested.
Theoretically it should take at least 7-8 minutes to induce someone using chloroform safely (which was an improvement over ether which could often take 12 minutes), this is by comparison with one of the best gases we use at the moment is sevoflurane which takes about 2-3 minutes (both from own experience and from numerous studies). However, by using a higher concentration (and thus running the risk of funny heart rhythms) you could decrease this time - James Simpson was the first person to use chloroform in anaesthesia and he described 'insensibility in 10-20 breaths', so about 1-2 minutes with someone breathing calmly. One of the disparities between these figures can be explained by the fact that you will get sleepy first, before you are deep enough for it to be called true general anaethesia. Anything that made you nervous or excited and got the adrenaline flowing would increase the time taken for the chloroform to work. Of course in films you rarely see people take more than 1 or 2 breaths through the hankie before being asleep!
As for quantity about 100-120 drops would be enough (according to Simpson he'd seen a strong man asleep with 7 breaths of 30 drops, but he didn't suggest this was usual) to get someone asleep (so a generous pour onto a towel is more likely a few drops on a hankie) and in fact these vapours were often delivered medically by pouring them onto a cloth of some description.
Anyway for those that are really interested, Simpson's original treatise is copied here - http://www.general-anaesthesia.com/misc/chloroform.html
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:47 am
Small Geezer
Boot
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 64
Quote:
Chlorine is what they put in swimming pools to make your eyes red
I don't want to gross people out, but it's not the chlorine that makes you eyes sting! It's a product of the reaction between chlorine and urea (as in the stuff in your wee). If there's no wee in the pool, there's no eye sting, unless they massively over chlorinate the pool!
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:49 am
Uhtoff
Veteran
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 75
Aye Sledgecaller - that's not only true for the properties of Ceretin, but for everything about perplexian physiology, they might have heavy lungs compared to humans...who knows?
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:55 am
Fuseunderground
Decorated
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 151
Uhtoff wrote:
....but for everything about perplexian physiology, they might have heavy lungs compared to humans...who knows?
Aren't Perplexians human?
I thought we'd heard them call themselves 'human'
using the term 'people from Earth' to distinguish us.
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:17 am
European Chris
Unfictologist
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: London's trendy Whitechapel
from an OOG perspective it would be silly to go into so much detail about an autopsy only for it to be allowed to completely dismissed so quickly.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:27 am
Uhtoff
Veteran
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 75
I didn't realise they were humans with a different culture though, I thought there might be a few difference, but mostly the same, thus lots of the auopsy info would be useful, but not all of it. Anyway, that's even more reason not to ignore the copper...still haven't heard back from Violet.
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:44 am
masterflea
Boot
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 14
Quote:
I don't want to gross people out, but it's not the chlorine that makes you eyes sting! It's a product of the reaction between chlorine and urea (as in the stuff in your wee). If there's no wee in the pool, there's no eye sting, unless they massively over chlorinate the pool!
uh, if i remember correctly (and I'm not sure that I do) the primary urea source for the eye-sting is generally sweat (which has the exact same compositional elements as urine, just in different concentrations).[/quote]
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:10 am
European Chris
Unfictologist
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: London's trendy Whitechapel
Well that's a lovely first post
PS: URGH
I'm off to chloroform everyone who ever used a swimming pool I've been in.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:15 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending