Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 18, 2024 5:32 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Diversions » Perplex City Puzzle Cards » PXC: Silver Puzzle Cards
[Puzzle] Silver #238 Riemann
Moderators: AnthraX101, bagsbee, BrianEnigma, cassandra, Giskard, lhall, Mikeyj, myf, poozle, RobMagus, xnbomb
View previous topicView next topic
Page 40 of 47 [697 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, ..., 45, 46, 47  Next
Author Message
DJ FreeMason
Boot

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 66

Rediculous nothing. That's bull hokey. Why in the world would they create a card in the first place that has, for now and probably for the next century, no answer? I understand they want tough as hell for the silvers, 13th Labor and Shuffled come to mind as well as Elucidate, but impossible period?

I think I'm going to turn my attention to trying to solve either Shuffled or 13th Labor.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:03 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Juxta
Unfettered

Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Posts: 675

Egads.

Might I suggest that you read the last few pages of the thread at least. March 20th specifically, when we got told the grim/great news. Then, when the opining over the puzzle's "fairness" got too great, a separate thread was split off here for the complaining to go on unhindered.

Net result: It's a puzzle. It's a question. Just because it's not Googleable doesn't make it any less valid. Whenever anyone asks a question, there is an answer - just because nobody has found it yet doesn't mean that it's any less of a question.

J
_________________
zzzshusoharuxpfrp

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:16 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
X_X
Guest


If you have a problem with Reimann, just send it back to MC.

Tell them you want another card to solve that is currently
solveable without a doctorate in Mathmatics and a team of
100 Math Professors to work on it with you.

they might send you one of the new wave Silvers that from what ive
seen look fun and doable. Might be a more fun challenge rather
than a brick wall.

Or you could just package it and stick it into a Safe Deposit box and
never look at it again. Either choice works.

either way just a suggestion.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 12:39 pm
 Back to top 
sackofpotatoes
Veteran


Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 86

New to Riemann here... and just read the 40 pages of posts. Whew.

I am not convinced that MC actually wants us to solve the Riemann hypothesis. Yes, I saw the article in the Sentinel; yes, I saw the emails from MC posted in this thread.

I don't buy it.

How can MC check our answers automatically if they don't know the answer? Submitted answers do not generate a "Submission accepted -- pending review" response, so there is no one looking over any proofs we might submit.

Either there is no way to generate a correct response to this card, or the answer is not, in fact, a proof of the Riemann hypothesis.

Personally, I'd like confirmation that there is a way to get a solve on this card at all. This is not a flame; I'm trying to look at this card with fresh eyes.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 2:28 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sackofpotatoes
Veteran


Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 86

Back on page 37, Guin posted an email from MC. Here's an excerpt.

Quote:
You may either: enter the proof directly into the solve form box for which we recommend a typesetting program such as Latex which enables you to mix text and mathematical formula relatively easily; give the name of an accepted proof to the hypothesis; name the author of an accepted proof to the hypothesis.


It seems that the other possibilities for solving this card that MC listed were largely ignored: the name of a proof or the author of such a proof.

I seem to recall these being tried from some early pages in this thread, but I thought I'd bring it back up for some reconsideration.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:14 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lhallModerator
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 411
Location: Portland, Oregon

sack, I know it's already been covered several times over in this thread before, and I don't have the energy to go back and find the link...so here is a link to donstobbart's post on the pxcforums, which are far less cluttered:

what Mind Candy's officially said about it

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:59 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
DJ FreeMason
Boot

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 66

I apologize for my little rant earlier. It was late, and I had a complete "box of hair" day.

Juxta, I have read all 40 pages of Reimann so saying that there was a thread created to bitch about Reimann isn't new to me. I apologize that I did it here.

However, that's neither here nor there. Personally, something doesn't add up. Why would MC offer this one up? It seems out of line with the other puzzles. I mean, currently the two other "impossipuzzles" are cryptographic in nature and eventually crackable. This one just seems like we're missing something basic. I know they've been saying that they want us to prove Reimann's Hypothesis but I can't help but think that something else is being asked beyond that.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:41 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
fretty
Decorated

Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 281
Location: South Yorkshire, England

I went on firebox the other day and remembered the references It gave to the Riemann Hypothesis. Did we ever find out the relevance of these?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:06 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Tarim
Boot

Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 21
Location: Bristol, UK

Hairysocks's Questions

hairysocks wrote:
Since our recent clues from MC mention that nobody on Earth has proved the Riemann hypothesis, I've decided to see if our new found alien friends living in Perplex City have proved it - of course, it wouldn't be called the "Riemann" hypothesis over there, unless by some very weird case of parallel evolution there was a mathematician there call Riemann who came up with an identical hypothesis (!) But even so, he may have been called Colin Riemann...

Tarim likes your thinking - but doesn't the web page say, "Please give your proof"? At first, Tarim thought that "your" meant you had to come up with your very own proof. However since Mind Candy said that you can give the name of someone who has proved the Riemann Hypothesis then Tarim thinks the "your" may refer to your species. So the name of the Perplexian who has solved it wouldn't be valid. Sad

The rest of your questions look somewhat easier than solving the Riemann Hypothesis - but anyone who prefers posts which are on-topic better just skip to the end...

hairysocks wrote:
1. Why are there just 7 colours in the visible spectrum?

Are there? What colour is "indigo" anyway? Tarim can see blue and violet separately but can't see one in between. If there are 6, then it's notable that humans have 3 types of colour sensor in their eyes. Call them R, G and B. Then the different configurations are: none, R, G, B, RG, RB, GB, RGB. None is black, RGB (all) is white, leaving 6 to give the different bands of colour. (OK, so it's actually more complicated as to why you can get RB firing at the same time when they are at opposite ends of the visible spectrum - it's to do with the wide frequency response of R which is only noticeable at low intensities.) How many colour receptors do Perplexians have?

hairysocks wrote:
3. Why are cats cute but crocodiles are scary.

Because they are less dangerous. Though it's not always obvious what we perceive as dangerous. For instance, anything with a head to body ratio bigger than an adult is seen as a baby which is not dangerous and hence cute. So Luxo Jr, the angle-poise lamp seen as the "i" in Pixar films is cute because its "shade" is bigger than its "body" relative to an "adult" angle-poise. (Yes, Lasseter did do this on purpose).

hairysocks wrote:
4. Why do buses always travel in groups, not nicely spread out?

Because it's a positive feedback situation. As soon as a bus becomes closer to the one in front than average - there are less passengers for it to pick up on average - so it can speed up and get closer still. On the other hand, if it gets slightly further than average away - there are more passengers than average - so it takes longer to pick them up and it slows down and gets even further from the one in front.

Meanwhile - back to Riemann...

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:54 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
hairysocks
Boot


Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Exeter, Devon, England

Thanks Tarim. By the way, I haven't had a reply from Professor Kiteway yet. Its rather rude of him to not respond. All that PR rubbish on the Academy web site about To ask a question is the beginning of knowledge - I will try sending the same email to Patrick Azadian, Sente's assistant. Maybe he will be more friendly.
_________________
"You never can tell with Heffalumps"

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
fuse
Greenhorn

Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 3

I saw this post on /. yesterday and thought straight away of this card. There's now a Wiki for attempting to pool resources and solve these Millenium problems.

http://www.qeden.com/wiki/The_Riemann_Hypothesis

Not sure what's already been mentioned/attempted as a solve for the card, but perhaps worth keeping an eye on?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:29 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
groovygirl20
Veteran


Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Lincolnshire! ENGLAND!! WOO!!

the 41st mersenne prime is 7235733 digits long it was discovered on the 15th may 2004 it can also be written 2 24036583 -1

it is also called the 41st "perfect number" (see http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Perfect_numbers.html its really confusing!)

it was found by Josh Findley of GIMPS (Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search)

also i found from http://www.explananda.com/archives/000195.html:
Quote:
There's a $100,000 prize for the discovery of the first prime with 10 million digits, which GIMPS is likely to claim within a couple years.
(thought this may be relevant because of the reward?!?!)


seems a lot of information for one line on the actual card lol
_________________
To the query, ''What is a friend?'' his reply was ''A single soul dwelling in two bodies.''

PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:04 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
maevey
Veteran

Joined: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 106

And that was an awful lot of information to tell us absolutely nothing new!

Am I allowed to trout? I want to so I will. Trout

PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:08 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
groovygirl20
Veteran


Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Lincolnshire! ENGLAND!! WOO!!

meh... i didnt fancy reading all the other 38 pages there were lol
_________________
To the query, ''What is a friend?'' his reply was ''A single soul dwelling in two bodies.''

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:07 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
brat-sampson
Decorated


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 289
Location: Stark

Next time you're not going to read a topic, don't feel any pressure to post in it either. You do realise that one of the reasons it's so long in the first place is because people like you (we shall call them group Â) post the same information numerous times because they can't be bothered to read what's happened so far and find out that what they have to say has been gone over thoroughly sometimes weeks or months before, and then people like me (group B) who then have to come along and remind you people precisely why what you've just done is so hypocritical and useless. Without all the Âs and Bs this topic would be about half the size. So please, next time try to think about what you're posting and make *sure* it's going to be something usefull.

In short, stop being an Â.

Not trying to be harsh, but surely you can see why posting something like that at the end of a thread like this without even reading it is hardly very productive to anyone.
_________________
[/spec]
Brat-Sampson³
writer of http://zoltor.freakash.net


PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:24 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 40 of 47 [697 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, ..., 45, 46, 47  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Diversions » Perplex City Puzzle Cards » PXC: Silver Puzzle Cards
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group