Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:17 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Diversions » Perplex City Puzzle Cards » PXC: Purple Puzzle Cards
[Ivy Set] #164 Weighs and Means
Moderators: AnthraX101, bagsbee, BrianEnigma, cassandra, Giskard, lhall, Mikeyj, myf, poozle, RobMagus, xnbomb
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 4 [59 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
Magma
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 119

[Ivy Set] #164 Weighs and Means

Quote:
There's a game we used to play at school in the labs, where we tried to make the most elaborate set of weights and rods that'd balance perfectly. Yes, I had a lot more free time then...

Here are two diagrams of balances I've set up, with the weight labels removed. Each weight is always a whole kilo - 1kg, 2kg, 3kg etc. Assuming that the strings and rods have no weight, can you figure out the value of the weights that I've numbered?

IF YOU USE THE LIGHTEST POSSIBLE COMBINATION OF WEIGHTS, THERE'S ONLY ONE CORRECT SOLUTION...


(I have taken the liberty of making an Excel document that can calculate if your combination on both the large and small setup balances or not. At the moment mine does, but it is apparently the WRONG answer)
164 rear.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   58.86KB
 Viewed   280 Time(s)

164 rear.jpg

164 front.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   51KB
 Viewed   435 Time(s)

164 front.jpg

164.xls
Description 
xls

 Download 
Filename  164.xls 
Filesize  20.5KB 
Downloaded  773 Time(s) 

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:31 am
Last edited by Magma on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:47 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
fretty
Decorated

Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 281
Location: South Yorkshire, England

On your small balance, the second level of weights is set differently to the card so you might have to use the left hand number as your answer for weight number 3. Don't know whether you're doing this already.

I can't spot any errors with copying the large diagram but haven't checked the formulas yet.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Magma
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 119

I didn't put the ticks in the small weight diagram, but the spacing is right - hence the 2kg one tick away balancing the 1kg two ticks away.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:25 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
fretty
Decorated

Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 281
Location: South Yorkshire, England

No I was just saying that when you copy your answer from your spreadsheet you may cross reference it with the card. So with weight 3 being right of the join, you could have copied the answer that is right of the join on the sheet when your answer is left of the join.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:31 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Magma
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 119

Okay, I've updated the XLS file with a new version - the weights you need are numbered #1, #2, etc. and each page has a table that says what the weights the puzzle asks for are currently set to, to avoid confusion. Is that what you meant?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:51 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
CRHB
Kilroy

Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 1

Given that it has to be the lowest set of weights, I tried to minimise the most distant and got something different to above. According to the site it is still did not right though Sad Any ideas?
Helen_164_168.xls
Description 
xls

 Download 
Filename  Helen_164_168.xls 
Filesize  18.5KB 
Downloaded  555 Time(s) 

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:52 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Magma
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 119

I think the key to solving this is working out the minimum weights that balance the top bar. We have this setup:

......5...........2.......4
. _ _ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ _ _
|.......................|...........|
|.......................|...........|
A......................B..........C

Remember the force acting on the pivot is equal to the mass x distance, so on the left:

5A acts downwards.

On the right:

2B and 6C acts downwards.

So we have the equation 5A = 2B + 6C, and we need the minimum.

I thought along these lines:
The bottom right set of weights mninmum weight is 1 on the four to the right, balanced by 10 on the left (10 vs 1x1 + 2x1 + 3x1 +4x1)

This makes the next set of weights up to be 14 on the left, which minimum balance is 6 on the far right and 2 on the near right (As each weight has to be at least 1, and integer values)

This means the weight acting at position B as labelled above has to be a minimum of 22kg. So the minimum configuration of the right-hand-side is (as far as B is concerned):

44 + 6C

Similarly, working up the tree of weights to position C gives a minimum value for C as 9kg. This would make the minimum right-hand-side force 44 + 54 = 98

The minimum configuration for A is 13, which makes the minimum left-hand-side configuration

65

This leaves the left side too light by force 33. Since this is not divisible by 5, some jiggery-pokery is needed on the right side too. Anyone know offhand which integer solution for 5A = 2B + 6C has the lowest value for A + B + C given that A >=13, B >= 22 and C >= 9?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:15 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Austin
Boot

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 53
Location: uk

The right hand side's force must be divisible by 5. I can get this as low as 100 but my solution was rejected. There must be a lighter way to do the right hand side, keeping the same downward force (as the left side's weights will have to add up to 20 whatever else happens, otherwise our attempts would have worked).

So far i have 20 Kg on the left and 32 Kg on the right.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Langley Moor
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 86

I get the same Austin, 20kg on the right hand side producing a moment of 100, and a total moment of 100 from the right hand side produced by 23kg at the secondincrement (moment of 46) and 9kg at the sixth increment (moment of 54). However, not accepted by the website. Anyone fancy writing to mind candy, as I can't be bothered this evening? If not I'll do it tomorrow Smile

PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Stratman
Veteran

Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 81
Location: Kettering UK

Has anyone confirmed whether you have to use 25 unique weights (ie 1kg,2kg,3kg,4kg......25kg) as in Erich Friedman's usual weight puzzles? I have tried a couple of solves with minimum weights (ie lots of 1s and 2s etc) with no luck.

link
http://www.stetson.edu/~efriedma/weight/
_________________
There Ain't Half Been Some Clever Bastards...Ian Dury and the Blockheads (1978)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:34 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Austin
Boot

Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 53
Location: uk

Stratman wrote:
Has anyone confirmed whether you have to use 25 unique weights (ie 1kg,2kg,3kg,4kg......25kg) as in Erich Friedman's usual weight puzzles?


I thought of that but how could you have a lightest combination if they always add up to 325 kg?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:31 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Phill4269
Greenhorn

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Location: London

I have tried several solutions without success.

One question is what do they mean by
Quote:
IF YOU USE THE LIGHTEST POSSIBLE COMBINATION OF WEIGHTS, THERE'S ONLY ONE CORRECT SOLUTION...


Given the three parts to the bottom diagram, to make it balance the parts need to satisfy 5X = 2Y + 6Z. Only the Z component can be at its absolute minimum. The X and Y components need to be increased in weight to achieve balance. There doesn't appear to be a unique way of doing this. As all possibilities have to add up the the same value how can one choose the lightest?

I have one more option to try ... but I have to wait 24 hours ... again ...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:49 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Stratman
Veteran

Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 81
Location: Kettering UK

Thanks Austin - good point.
I also had a solve with 100 each side...
Left 20x5
Right 23x2 and 9x6
...with no luck
I cant see how it can be done with less.
Stumped!
_________________
There Ain't Half Been Some Clever Bastards...Ian Dury and the Blockheads (1978)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:31 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
gagravarr
Greenhorn

Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 4

Stratman wrote:
I also had a solve with 100 each side...


I've managed to come up with two different solutions with a moment of 100 each side. (Either 7 or 8 on the bottom left bar, with changes to the other two left bars, but still with total weight 20). Neither of them have been accepted.

I can't see how we can get the right hand side down to a moment of only 90, so I'm stumped. I've emailed mind candy my two solutions to ask them if there's a problem.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TopGun2
Boot

Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 30
Location: Cambs, UK

I'm struggling to see how you can get the right hand side to make 100. I can see the 9*6=54 but I can't get 23*2 I'm stuck with 22 or 25 any hints?


Secondly, it might be worth trying to set this out in a set of simultaneous equations & solving by matrices. I'll have to dig out my study notes to revise how!
_________________
Audere Est Facere

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:21 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 4 [59 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Diversions » Perplex City Puzzle Cards » PXC: Purple Puzzle Cards
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group