unforum

ixalon

I think decompiling the flash is really no different from looking at HTML, JavaScript, XML, EXIF metadata etc. etc. With SWF they could easily hide parts of the code they don't want people to see and use server-based authentication if they didn't want us finding passwords etc. in the SWF files.

But I agree that some people find this at least partially unethical, so out of curtesy I think that anything found this way should be marked as a spoiler.

**Posted:** Fri May 12, 2006 7:05 am

Vortex2k6 · Guest

I dont know either lol when i did compile it i did look at all images, and sounds, but there were no videos enclosed within it apparently which makes me think the videos are streaming from somewhere else?

**Posted:** Fri May 12, 2006 8:23 am

astraflame · Kilroy Joined: 14 May 2006 Posts: 2

bobbling link

**Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 4:27 am

curiouswife

As far as I can see, all the project pages have a possible link on their 'About the....' title - whether it will link eventually, or whether its just leading us back to the main page of that project (ie what you're on already) I'm not sure. May just be sloppy design - we've had a little of that on this site.

**Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 3:33 pm

_________________
Curiousity doesn't kill - ignorance does.

August · Boot Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 39

If a boot may suggest

**Posted:** Tue May 16, 2006 4:48 am

catherwood

This community has played many games for many (several?) years and has already come to terms with decompiling Flash -- it has never (as far as i can remember) been tagged or spoilered before, and we're not going to change.

Correct, you cannot retain any embedded information from a stegged image by only grabbing a screen capture. Part of the reasoning behind stegonography is that the visible portion is not where the data lies.

As for a stegged image being stored inside a Flash file, well, call me skeptical. That is all.

**Posted:** Tue May 16, 2006 10:49 am

_________________
meh. whatever.