unforum

[Wulfgirl]

Evamonkey,

That was a great piece of detective work on the ship. I wonder if the producers of the game thought we'd find out that this ship is archored now and not going anywhere? Thanks for posting that.

[evamonkey]

hahah thanks so much, i was sure id get blasted hahahaha. i just translated the boat name, then ran both through google.

its speculative at best, but since i only saw this whole lost experience for foirst time today had was looking through some official sites, the boat mentions and that pic jumped at me, if it means anything at all. which i doubt it does.

in reality, there was prob months between blog and pic, no rational reason to relate them unless your seeing both in a short time.

will look at other pics

but thanks for making my wild speculaton feel valid!

[evamonkey]

ok, here is my next brain fart on images.
the pic grass, with the car in the field. They tyre manufacturer is falcon, which i had never heard of. so i googled.

now it seems to exist.... but the page says its really dunlop tyres name over seas( advert) also, in said page on the left is a small octagonal logo. i could let that go, but....... the fact it listed me as the sites first visitor. if it was an oversees name for dunlop.... wouldnt the have more hits.... than me. thought the amount of google references says tis a real company.


http://www.falcontyres.com/
some names are mentioned and such, wonder if they mean anything.



if anything, it means they car is in a country what used name falcon instead of dunlop. theyre apparently based in india. any clues to be taken from that? cos i only know that brand as dunlop.

..............................................................

pic of seating looks doctored, so seat number tags are missing, no one will ever get seat numbers, but is there possible significance to arrangment of tagless seats.

example, in row 1- 3 tags are visible, row 2- 5 row 3 -7

all primes.

...................................
the airline reference.
hmmmm too bad thet dont have wings.
searched for winged kangaroos,

apparently the original quantos logs had winged kangaroos and this was only changed after 1984 to remove the wings. wonder if thats an intentional reference.
http://www.qantas.com.au/info/about/history/details19

what i can say for sure, is that these pictures show a pattern of possible movment , india for the tyres, the korean food( isint there mention of a hanzo facility there?) buenos aries. This guy has moved, a lot i think. could he be investigating hanzo sites. Is it possible that sun's father is related to the asian branch?

[SpiralBoundBook]

[evamonkey]

hmmm , hows this for a thought.

the text box on bole with pie says direct observation or participation.

my answer is

participation.

hes posing a question based on the optical illusion presented in the image. which is whether the character behind is observing(direct observation) from behind a wall or participating. The truth lies in the fact that the character behind is a mirror image. the hair is a mirror of the other image of him in the pics list. the mirror is resting so that is at a slight upward angle, making the mirrored character look shorter than he is. The angle of shot does not prevent the mirror from hiding a camera in the reflected characters other hand.

so its mandrake that took that pic, even thought it looks like he is observing, he is interacting.

what that signifies, i have no idea.
the whole image seems heavily doctored though. cos if its a genuine refoection, the character with pie should have at least a little of his shoulder reflected.and the lighting on pie guys head does not match the body. thath whole area to left of bole looks very wrong.
almost positive the blue object is a heating radiator. if mandrake is meant to be in a reflection its poorly done, if hes meant to be behind bole, its poorly done.

what do you think?

[theShaggy]

Would make more sense as a WORD.

"Welcome, your next video needs your participation"

can anyone find it on rbd.com?

[Gus Raja]

[danteIL]

[Gus Raja]

[Gus Raja]

[evamonkey]

i would say, that the bridge you have there is not the correct one.
designs like this all share a very common look, doe to the engineering principals in their construction, and their utilitarian design for strength to weight reasons.

if you look at the bridge in your pic, vesrus the one in the official blog pic, you can see some design differences. your birdge has spike like projections on its top most surfaces at both ends. The official design does not.

the official bridges construction also features thick prominent vertical beams along its upper curve. your bridge is missing these but has some very spidery ones.

just below the dot in www.cgstock in your pic, you see a vertical structure that links the top sections to the support legs. On the ship pics, the bridge has an overhang of the top element on either side of the legs , showing no such vertical elements as in your bridges silhouette.

your bridge has two large solid forms at the connection between top section and legs, these are absent in the pics with ship.

finally , counting the box sections of top piece in your pic shows a 9 section build between the legs. the official bridge has at least 11.

lastly, in your bridge, it is relativly alone in place, where as in the official pic a very large scaffolded object that can almost look like tis part of the bridge because it intersects its silhouette is part of a second bridge behind the first, the top bean of which can be seen just between the boat and the front bridges top span, due to atmospheric fog, it will appear a slightly lighter colour. this bridge would be clearly visible in your shot if it was the same location, as it has very distinctive fully cladded areas on its legs that would show up in your pic as large dark rectangles at the base of a bridge behind your current one.



i really thing, these are 2 very different bridges when you get down to fine details. if im wrong please correct me.



in all images featuring the vessel, including real out of game sites, a tower block can be seen on the left of the boat, its very distinctive. it has light tone in the middle and dark grey sections either side. This proves that in the official pics, where it is currently a museum to this day, it is located in the same place as in blog pic. This establishes that the boat is where it always was.

i agree that the relevance of the pic is becoming less substabtial, and is probably a dead end.

[Gus Raja]

[evamonkey]

yep, you can see all the features and the bridge behind with the solid leg sections. its a match im guessing.

there was no point in rejecting any idea out of hand. this whole game is sorting fact from fiction through discussion and observation.

were all sifting the desert with a pan handling tray, any possible links must be put forward and explored thoroughy in both directions, otherwise nuggets could slip through. and folks like nuggets. You could have been right in another life brother. ( i dont know why, but i felt compelled to phrase it like that)
the buenos aries thing may not be totally random at all. its tying a lot of the random pics together.

[Gus Raja]

[evamonkey]

england is way way behind, ireland is only a few eps from the finale, but to be honest, 90 percent of the people i have spoken to can barley wait the amount of time it takes for it to get online from the US showing. i think the whole net world is playing on the american timeline.