Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 19, 2024 3:46 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: Questions/Meta
"Jumped the Shark" thread and ongoing IRC debates
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 2 [28 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
BrianEnigma
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Oct 2003
Posts: 1199
Location: Pacific Northwest

"Jumped the Shark" thread and ongoing IRC debates

I debated whether to put this in that "jump the shark" thread or to start a new one. Then I started to wonder if the original thread was less about PXC jumping the shark and more about people becoming frustrated with Unfiction's PXC resources. So I post this here as a new thread. It's not about jumping the shark. It's about all the drama going on in #syzygy. It is being posted so that it is out in the open and because not everyone is online at the same time. This is a little less ephemeral than the screen scrolling of a realtime chat.

Fact: recently, the #syzygy channel has been off-putting for both newbies and PXC old-timers. Many people, both new and old, had (temporarily?) left the channel because the drama got too overwhelming. Several people who were around a year ago or longer have returned to find a mess. This drama has been going on for weeks (if not months), but has really bubbled to the surface in the past week.

Item: Random Speculation Monster (RSM)
- It's an inside joke.
- It's like a trout, but different.
- I'm part of the community, yet I don't really know what it is exactly.
- The Wiki definition doesn't really say much at the time of writing this ("It lurks around UnFiction, preying on the open-minded and inducing them to get over-excited" followed by a retraction of that definition.)
- Trouts are nice in that when invoked on the boards, you get a link to the description of trout. More often than not, a link to the original thread is included by the person doing the trouting, too.

Item: Op Promotion
- In the business world, there is a lot of controversy over promotions. When you are looking for a new CEO, or IT Manager or whatever, do you promote people up the ranks from within or do you hire someone from outside? There are pros and cons for each. Promoting from within seems fair and makes people happy--a payoff for long-term effort. Using someone from outside the company may bring a new skillset to the table that nobody within the company has--it brings in fresh blood and new energy.
- People were brought in as ops during the SF event while the regular ops were away. SpaceBass brought in people he knew and respected from previous ARGs--people he knew would do a good job. I imagine this decision was made at the last minute during a crisis, so he went with people he immediately knew he could trust.
- Whether or not folks admit to it, there are obviously bad feeling about who got picked to be an op and who got passed over and this seems to be related to who's "active" in the PXC community and who's not (or maybe who's perceived as not being active.)

Item: Misunderstanding
- People in IRC were using the RSM to smack down new (and potentially useful) ideas. Whether or not they consciously knew they were doing so, it still happened.
- The ops saw this and talked to some of the folks that seemed like the worst "offenders" (for lack of a better term.)
- The non-ops saw this as a witch hunt and a total ban on the RSM. "The RSM is an in-joke and the non-player ops just don't understand."
- While it is true that they may not understand, they have experience in seeing when something is being used negatively.

Solution:
Well, here's where the discussion comes in. The situation is full of drama and bad feelings. What can we do to make this better?

As for channel ops, a few more active PXC community members have "gotten promotions." I hope that this will smooth things out a bit and make the op promotions seem less arbitrary and last-minute. I agree with Space's original decisions, but can understand that others may not agree.

As for the RSM. I've put in an !RSM script that will direct people to the Wiki page. I understand that it's an inside joke, and I understand that I don't quite understand it. So I ask you (someone, anyone) to please enhance the Wiki definition, to help bring out the humor and silliness. If I've been around for a couple of years and don't quite "get" the joke of the RMS, I can't imagine what a newbie feels when it gets hoisted upon him or her. So let's help educate that the RSM is not simply a smackdown (or if it is a smackdown, let's drop it or change it to something a bit more lighthearted.) I don't care if it was used negatively in the recent past. In my mind, that's behind us, all is forgiven, and we can start fresh.

So let's start.
_________________
Y0 Resources / VP Wiki / PXC Catalog / Metacortex

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:08 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
lhall
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 411
Location: Portland, Oregon

I think this is a big, and great, step in the right direction.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:21 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
jojojojo
Decorated


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 208
Location: Where the puffins fly, and the sheep roam.

Re: "Jumped the Shark" thread and ongoing IRC deba

BriEnigma wrote:
I debated whether to put this in that "jump the shark" thread or to start a new one. Then I started to wonder if the original thread was less about PXC jumping the shark and more about people becoming frustrated with Unfiction's PXC resources.


This thread was about us discussing what is good and bad about Perplex City and whether or not it has reached it's peak. It never started as debate about UF resources, however the points raised on that thread should be noted as it is obvious people are unhappy.

BriEnigma wrote:
Item: Random Speculation Monster (RSM)
- It's an inside joke.
- It's like a trout, but different.
- I'm part of the community, yet I don't really know what it is exactly.
- The Wiki definition doesn't really say much at the time of writing this ("It lurks around UnFiction, preying on the open-minded and inducing them to get over-excited" followed by a retraction of that definition.)


I shall stick up for the cuddly beast that is the RSM.

The RSM is not and never was a trout type object. It is about laughing at ourselves when speculation get out of hand, knowing that we all get carried away from time to time. He is a pet, something to have fun with. Like all phrases, it will get abused.

Trout has been abused far more in the past, and in a more horrid manner too. Yes, the RSM may be off-putting to newbies, but when entering a community with no idea what is going on a trout can also be intimidating.

Cherish the RSM, give him a hug but beware his tentacles don't get you...
_________________
For the record I have one head!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:36 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
duckiemonster
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 554
Location: Oxford, UK

A noble attempt, Bri. Good luck.

I think I said everything that I wanted to say last night. Looks like it was ignored by all present, but I'd urge everyone who is intending on posting in this thread to take a look at the chat logs from about 4.30pm to about 9pm yesterday. You can find them here.

A lot of your points refer to 'new players'. Perhaps new players need to be made aware that we're pretty much in endgame here, so they're going to have to sit it out (more or less) until the start of season 2.

The shark thread is not about #syzygy or UnFiction,it's about the game. Remember, that thing that we're here to play? Rolling Eyes
_________________
duckiemonster.com w00t!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:38 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
colin
Entrenched

Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 810
Location: Australia

duckiemonster wrote:
I think I said everything that I wanted to say last night. Looks like it was ignored by all present, but I'd urge everyone who is intending on posting in this thread to take a look at the chat logs from about 4.30pm to about 9pm yesterday. You can find them here.

Any chance of a summary? 4.5hrs of chat log is pretty painful to read Crying or Very sad

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:00 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Muffin
Unfettered


Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 306
Location: UK, Leicester

colin wrote:
Any chance of a summary? 4.5hrs of chat log is pretty painful to read Crying or Very sad


Yeah, about 90 minutes worth! And it was pretty painful, not only for its length, but also in content. Being a infrequent chatter, I had no idea! Anyway, I think it was summed up best here:

lhall wrote:
2006/08/22-18:54 <@lhall> unfiction feels that pxc hasn't had proper moderation in a while, and the community has become insular
2006/08/22-18:54 <@lhall> pxc is upset that new mods have been appointed that aren't from the community, but are regulating community culture


The chat was really the "spugmeistress/duckie/ollie/jojojojo" PXC 'community' vs "ehsan" and all other mods (brianenigma/varin/amberjoy/rose) as they were dragged in.

To be honest, don't read it unless you want your illusions of a 'community' being ripped apart. It made me both angry and sad.

I won't add any opinions, as I agree totally with what Brianenigma is trying to do.

Please everyone, try to play nice, for the sake of the people who haven't yet enjoyed an ARG, and might be put off by the bickering!

M
_________________
100 of 333

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:25 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Mikeyj
Unfictologist


Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 1847
Location: London

Muffin wrote:
To be honest, don't read it unless you want your illusions of a 'community' being ripped apart. It made me both angry and sad.

I won't add any opinions, as I agree totally with what Brianenigma is trying to do.

Please everyone, try to play nice, for the sake of the people who haven't yet enjoyed an ARG, and might be put off by the bickering!


Seconded.

Plus, on a slightly different tack

Duckie wrote:
Perhaps new players need to be made aware that we're pretty much in endgame here, so they're going to have to sit it out (more or less) until the start of season 2.
I think now's as good a time as any to start. From playing the cards, to making connections that less fresh eyes may fail to spot. I believe this is MC's approach too. Plus it's good to get your hand in before Season Two, whether you lurk or post or whatever.
_________________
Irrelevant musings.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:41 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
myf
Entrenched


Joined: 30 Dec 2005
Posts: 917
Location: Hiding from squirrels

Muffin wrote:
To be honest, don't read it unless you want your illusions of a 'community' being ripped apart. It made me both angry and sad.

I won't add any opinions, as I agree totally with what Brianenigma is trying to do.

Please everyone, try to play nice, for the sake of the people who haven't yet enjoyed an ARG, and might be put off by the bickering!


Thirded.

Good grief, my head hurts after reading through that lot.
_________________
"I play the game for the game's own sake"
PSN ID & GamerTag: sleepymyf ~ Wii number: 5915 5999 6937 3087


PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:22 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
UKver2.0
Decorated

Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 270

duckiemonster wrote:
Perhaps new players need to be made aware that we're pretty much in endgame here, so they're going to have to sit it out (more or less) until the start of season 2.
I respectfully disagree.

Edit: I guess I didn't realize what kind of war was brewing. Comments removed - not that they were incorrect, but certainly not appropriate considering current events.
_________________
Naomi: We did joke that we’d end up have to go round to your houses with shovels, drive you to the location and tell you to dig.
Andrea: Paint a little X on the ground with spray paint..
Naomi: and then you’d try to anagram 'shovels'


PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:30 am
Last edited by UKver2.0 on Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
poozle
Entrenched

Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 1090

I just read the first hour or so of the logs and as well as my head hurting a LOT from all the text I thought one thing, both sides raise perfectly good points.

I can't say I have any idea whats going on in the past few weeks because every time I've been in IRC recently its either been normal conversation or complete silence, no problems though.

I can't take any sides in this because I really don't have major opinions on the things being expressed here and I think that both sides have overreacted over the things being said.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:49 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
colin
Entrenched

Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 810
Location: Australia

UKver2.0 wrote:
Muffin wrote:
The chat was really the "spugmeistress/duckie/ollie/jojojojo" PXC 'community' vs...
Why am I not surprised? This group was intimidating to me at first, but once you get used to them, you start to auto filter the trash out and start to hear their good points. I actually thought they were getting better, but I guess it was just my filter program that was improving.
Just pre-empting any flame wars here. Please keep the topic on track ( and reply to these comments in PM is you feel the need to. Smile )

It would be nice if the replies could be a little less antagonistic Wink

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:59 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
doublecross
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 588
Location: London, UK

I've just read the chat logs and I agree with the comments from Muffin onwards. There have been overreactions on both sides, and I caution both sides from thinking they speak for more people than they actually do. Also: disagreeing with someone is not censoring them. Only actually editing posts and banning people is censoring them, and this has only happened in one recent case (IIRC).

Longstanding players can seem intimidating to new ones (or even not so new, but irregular ones), especially when a vernacular has grown up around a game, but that is chiefly a feature of a game having gone on for a relatively long time. However I haven't found any longstanding players unfriendly if spoken to, and I certainly don't think it is too late for new players to join season one.
_________________
xx

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Duckie|werk
Guest


If anyone would like to tell me exactly *how* I've intimidated them and where it is that I've gone wrong please feel free. I'll read 'em all.

I'm sure this will also apply to the others on UKver2.0's list of 'bad uns'.

My PM box is entirely at your disposal, unless something rather untoward should happen to my account here. After that point, it's duckiemonster[splat]gmail.com.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:21 am
 Back to top 
myf
Entrenched


Joined: 30 Dec 2005
Posts: 917
Location: Hiding from squirrels

*Long post alert* My opinions, as a not-particularly-newbie-not-core-of-the-community person:

Re: Intimidating persons - I have never found any particular person intimidating (indeed, when I've ventured into the real world and actually met people, they seem perfectly nice), it's rather a group of people en masse can seem a little.........unnerving.

I'm not a big fan of IRC - I find it all too bewildering with 10 different conversations whizzing past me at once - but on the occasions I have ventured into chat, I tend to sit there feeling slightly, well, odd one out, and as if I have nothing to add so I might as well stay quiet. I don't think this is unique to #syzygy - I feel this will happen with any established group where other people might amble along every so often. Cliques form (intentionally or not), and "outsiders" can feel threatened or unwelcome when trying to join them.

As for a solution? I'm not sure there is one really, but a little encouragement, friendliness and patience towards newbies/infrequent visitors would probably go a long way. Taking the time to explain some of the jargon, or providing an easy way to find out what people are on about, might help.

Anyway, all this may just be a manifestation of my tendencies towards social awkwardness.

Re: mysterious entities (elephants, bananas, RSM, and trouts to a lesser extent) and understanding - I appreciate that others might find them endearing/amusing/part of the experience/whatever, but I'm not a big fan of these terms. I think they are horribly overused, and often in the wrong context - as has been pointed out, they often appear to be employed as a way of saying "I think this line is a dead-end, so we should all stop discussing it", which I for one would find very off-putting.

Solution? Again, tricky. Consider whether they're used in the right context. If your entire response to something is simply going to be "banana" (or similar), is it really worth bothering? Give a bit of an explanation - I'd take it as much politer to be told "not sure about that idea", or "nice thought, but don't think so because...". Lay off the terms a bit - give them a bit of a holiday.

So, that's my contribution.

And none of this post is aimed at anyone in particular.
_________________
"I play the game for the game's own sake"
PSN ID & GamerTag: sleepymyf ~ Wii number: 5915 5999 6937 3087


PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:12 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
Mico
Boot

Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 66
Location: Leighton Buzzard, Beds

colin wrote:

It would be nice if the replies could be a little less antagonistic Wink


Who's antagonistic? I'm not antagonistic. I'm not sure I like your tone – do you want a fight? That's fighting talk that is! Why you little…..
And so on…

And yes, for those with a sense of humour failure, these comments are not to be taken seriously (sorry Colin Wink )

I am a relative n00bie – only been here a few months – and had never heard of a ARG nor chatted in IRC before dropping into this twisty-turny little world we call PXC. However after lurking for a little while trying to work out WTF is going on (and WTF all the TLA's stand for!), I started to actively participate. The only way I knew who to talk to and what their personalities were like was by reading what they (i.e. you) had written. It was mostly good, with the occasional dimissive comment. As my sense of humour is generally based around dry sarcasm I could understand where most of it was going, but it's easy to see how some of the comments could be seen as abusive and inflamatory.

Oh, and in case you missed it - good spot by Ryan. The life link should be read by everyone! (Note: that is advice, not an order Wink ) But like this post, read it, take on board the fact that what you say and do affects other people (and can be misinterpreted or taken the wrong way!), then move on and have fun with the game/community - and this is to both players and mods alike. We're all people, people. You have free speech, so use it responsibly and respect others'. I'm not taking sides (mainly because I don't think we should be segregated on this one), so I'll just say the only censorship should be by your own sense of good manners... but if that fails there should be someone to bring you back into the warm cuddliness of polite social intercourse!

Life's too short not to enjoy yourself. So please play nicely kids.

Mico
xxx
*Mico gets off his soapbox

PS. If anything I said can be taken two different ways and one of them upset you, I meant the other one! Laughing

Edit: Typo

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:11 pm
Last edited by Mico on Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [28 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: Questions/Meta
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group