Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:18 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
Poll

Do we need a more IG forum?

YES!!11
64%
 64%  [ 9 ]
noo ;-;
35%
 35%  [ 5 ]

Total Votes : 14

 
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Deus City » DC: Deus City
[DC][OOG]New forum time?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [15 Posts]  
Author Message
Mindez
Decorated

Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 165

[DC][OOG]New forum time?
Need we another Place?

Okay, hello.

See the "What's OOG And What's IG" for what started this poll.

Basically, I feel that we need another forum (With IG and OOG areas) to collaborate in. Password protected and/or member access forums for the Foo and the Brackin sides, plus an OOG area for general discussions and getting to know each other better.

I think it would help people to get what's going on, because here it's a bit confusing as to what is real and what isn't.

I'm not meaning this as being biased against Unforums, but I don't think that the Unforum policy of completely open discussion will work with such an ARG as Deus City, in which we must keep our information secret from the "other side".

I can make the forum and stuff (I can make it at something like deus.tamino.co.uk anyway)

What would everyone think of that?
_________________
http://www.twitter.com/mindez
http://www.youtube.com/mindez


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:41 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Agent Lex
Entrenched


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1188
Location: No longer London, still in England

The problem I can immediately see is control of access. Assuming the forums are simply password-protected, who decides the password? Will there be any measure to change it and spread the new password if/when the "other side" finds what it is? And perhaps most importantly, who will have the password at first to give access to others?

On Foo's side, I can see the answer to the last question is those first few who he trusts explicitly. On Brackin's side, there doesn't seem to be anyone who's more "priveleged" (that said, there's not nearly as much unique information on that side either).

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:37 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
imbri
Entrenched


Joined: 21 Sep 2002
Posts: 1182
Location: wonderland

I've already chimed in more than I meant to on this issue. But, please carefully consider this.

You mention "the Unforum policy of completely open discussion" - I don't know that it's a policy as much as it is the nature of the internet. It's a publicly viewable website. Anyone can see anything. The only way that you're going to keep your information "secret from the "other side"" is by locking those boards behind some sort of password that only people on the various side will have access to.

So, the Foo Folk might have a board with the password oof and the Brackin Backers will have a board with the password nikcarb. Only, of course, they wouldn't be *that* obvious because then "omg! someone from the other side might see it! ohnoes!"

So, now you've:
* segmented the community playing the game - drastically reducing the people you have to solve puzzles and what not because "OMG! What if the puzzle leads to a website! Then the people on the otherside will know! ohnoes!"

* made it twice as hard to build the story as you'll each only have one half of the picture (this can be a very clever device in team based ARGs, mind you) and an obvious bias.

* made it much more difficult for new people to get in on the game - they suddenly have to choose sides, they know virtually nothing of the characters, and have to figure out how to join a side.

* cultivated a sphere of mistrust - how do you know who to let in to each group? What if someone is a spy - that really cool & excited new player might actually be a Brackin or Foo in disguise. And, OMG! the admin can see and post in both groups! I bet he's telling everyone our secrets! Suddenly you've stopped trusting everyone and find yourselves in teeny little groups hidden away and only talking to the few people you trust.

I fully support your right to play where and how you want to play. I just think that you should really think about splitting off into password protected forums. Especially considering the PMs own advice:

Deus City PMs wrote:

1. We completely respect the rules of Unforums. The characters "ignore" information that was obviously only obtained from the forums. So really whatever you post there is fair game

2. We don't force you to choose sides. In fact we'd love it if people tried to play both sides, it makes the game more interesting.


The choice is up to y'all. But I'm going to let you know in advance that if you do decide to move and split off into super seekret forums - I want in both groups Wink

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:47 pm
Last edited by imbri on Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

Heh, yes, let me clarify: when I said "if you really want to keep information secret from the "other side" you may need to use resources other than Unfiction," I didn't mean to imply that I was recommending that course of action -- I still think that it's a bad idea to pit players against each other OOG as well as IG, and the passage imbri quoted from the PMs' meta site seems to indicate that they're not keen on the idea either.

I was just saying that was the only feasible way I saw to pull off keeping info secret from the other side, not that it was a good idea.
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:04 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Mindez
Decorated

Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 165

Agent Lex wrote:
The problem I can immediately see is control of access. Assuming the forums are simply password-protected, who decides the password? Will there be any measure to change it and spread the new password if/when the "other side" finds what it is? And perhaps most importantly, who will have the password at first to give access to others?


Control of access is going to be an issue. The best option I can see is assigning moderators from each "side", to moderate their own forum. As for the passwords, there will be two (actually, three, because some will be playing both sides) user groups, that admin/mod can assign them too. Then they'll be able to access their 'side's forum (I don't like using the word "side", but it's all I can think of at the moment).

Thus, as an example, if someone were to join Foo, as they get the email from Foo and contact the Gatekeepers, I would put them into the usergroup of "Foo Fighters", then they could see and post in the "Foo Fighters" board.

As for Brackin... I'm not sure. Is there an official "Okay, I trust you." email that he sends? The Brackin followers don't seem to be quite so collected together as the Foo followers...

Quote:
Heh, yes, let me clarify: when I said "if you really want to keep information secret from the "other side" you may need to use resources other than Unfiction," I didn't mean to imply that I was recommending that course of action -- I still think that it's a bad idea to pit players against each other OOG as well as IG, and the passage imbri quoted from the PMs' meta site seems to indicate that they're not keen on the idea either.


I'm not necessarily pitting them against each other OOG, and if that's what it looks like, well. Okay, it probably is.

But I believe that a forum like the proposed is how Deus City was originally designed by the founders to be played. I'm not encouraging OOG rivalry, there will be OOG forums in which we will bear no grudge and just be friends with each other, but we really do need password protected areas, if just for the confidential stuff we find that the other side shouldn't know about.
_________________
http://www.twitter.com/mindez
http://www.youtube.com/mindez


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:25 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Agent Lex
Entrenched


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1188
Location: No longer London, still in England

Mindez wrote:
As for Brackin... I'm not sure. Is there an official "Okay, I trust you." email that he sends? The Brackin followers don't seem to be quite so collected together as the Foo followers...


To clarify on this, basically emailing Brackin for the first time so far has yielded the response of "Okay x, I'm going to trust you. I believe in trusting people"
As such, the Brackin forum would probably be just as open. Of course, knowing that someone is a Foo Fighter (if there were usergroups) might go against it, which is why passwords might be more effective in this situation - to play both sides effectively, you don't really want either side to know you're on the other side.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:29 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Mindez
Decorated

Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 165

imbri wrote:
I've already chimed in more than I meant to on this issue. But, please carefully consider this.

You mention "the Unforum policy of completely open discussion" - I don't know that it's a policy as much as it is the nature of the internet. It's a publicly viewable website. Anyone can see anything. The only way that you're going to keep your information "secret from the "other side"" is by locking those boards behind some sort of password that only people on the various side will have access to.


Hence the proposed. I believe it's how Deus City is meant to be played. See previous post.

Quote:
* segmented the community playing the game - drastically reducing the people you have to solve puzzles and what not because "OMG! What if the puzzle leads to a website! Then the people on the otherside will know! ohnoes!"


Yes, we have halved our number of players. But in game, there only *should* be the Foo side working on the Foo puzzles, and vice versa. With the current arrangement, there is only a very faint distinction between what is IG and OOG. As an example, if one of the Brackin's solved one of the Foo's puzzle, should it matter because it was OOG?

Clearly it should. However, one of the Foos got the answer from an OOG source. So it doesn't count, according to the general rule we have now.

Quote:
* made it twice as hard to build the story as you'll each only have one half of the picture (this can be a very clever device in team based ARGs, mind you) and an obvious bias.


The nature of this will depend on the game. If the game has been built very well, then it will be wonderful that we only have one half. This way, Foo can give us one story, Brackin can give us another. So, if Foo's side of the story says that Foo's God, and Brackin's story says that Foo is satan, naturally the Foo believers will be more on Foo's side, and Brackin's will be more on Brackin's.

I think that if this were on a PUBLIC channel like Unfiction, we'd see straight through it, having both sides of the story, and look at it with a more open mind, which might detriment the fun of following someone. It will certainly be a more emotional and, I think, funner journey if we only have one side of the story.

As I say, it all depends on how the founders have made Deus City. If they've made it good (Like, for example, the above scenario) then playing it like I suggest will be very fun. If they've not made it "good", then it may possibly be better on Unforums.

But I want to believe they're making this game good, and so I want to play on it in a way as I have proposed.

Quote:
* made it much more difficult for new people to get in on the game - they suddenly have to choose sides, they know virtually nothing of the characters, and have to figure out how to join a side.


Again, a good problem. There will be public forums, and guides for joining 'sides' and whatever.

Quote:
* cultivated a sphere of mistrust - how do you know who to let in to each group? What if someone is a spy - that really cool & excited new player might actually be a Brackin or Foo in disguise. And, OMG! the admin can see and post in both groups! I bet he's telling everyone our secrets! Suddenly you've stopped trusting everyone and find yourselves in teeny little groups hidden away and only talking to the few people you trust.


Again, yes. As for the "admin can see and post in both groups", I would like to reiterate that I will *NOT* be doing this, for I believe it seriously detriments the fun. I shall appoint a moderator for the Brackin side, if one is necessary, and I won't go anywhere near there. I know that I have no way of prooving it, short of removing the admin account, but I absolutely WILL NOT GO THERE.

As for the "sphere of mistrust", I'll know who joins the Foo team by the Gatekeepers. If someone is a spy to of Brackin's, and Foo's Gatekeepers have let them in, then they should have access to Foo's knowledge, because Foo has trusted them. It's a risk there is, if we do get a spy. But if there is, and we find the identity of the spy, then we can "change the passwords" (OOG equivalent: Remove them from the usergroup) and continue.

I'm not aiming to spread seeds of distrust around. OOG, people are still to be encouraged to be friends.
_________________
http://www.twitter.com/mindez
http://www.youtube.com/mindez


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:42 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
imbri
Entrenched


Joined: 21 Sep 2002
Posts: 1182
Location: wonderland

Mindez wrote:

Hence the proposed. I believe it's how Deus City is meant to be played. See previous post.


If that's the case, then why didn't the PMs set Foo up with password controlled forums to which he only allowed those that he trusted in? Or did he appoint you to do it?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:09 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Mindez
Decorated

Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 165

imbri wrote:
Mindez wrote:

Hence the proposed. I believe it's how Deus City is meant to be played. See previous post.


If that's the case, then why didn't the PMs set Foo up with password controlled forums to which he only allowed those that he trusted in?


Well, okay. I'll put it another way - I certainly don't think that the game is supposed to be played with Foo's side and Brackin's side corroborating together on a PUBLIC forum, not when one of the key things that we must do is infiltrate the other side and somehow extract information in a secretive manner from them.
_________________
http://www.twitter.com/mindez
http://www.youtube.com/mindez


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:14 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

Mindez wrote:
Well, okay. I'll put it another way - I certainly don't think that the game is supposed to be played with Foo's side and Brackin's side corroborating together on a PUBLIC forum, not when one of the key things that we must do is infiltrate the other side and somehow extract information in a secretive manner from them.


Why?

The characters can't know about this forum -- it's out-of-game, and ergo outside their realm of existence. So they can't be aware that you're collaborating here. Ergo, neither of them can feel "betrayed" or "suspicious" because players are actively collaborating here.

And I'm a little confused as to how you'd take the PMs' suggestion to "play both sides" WITHOUT sharing the information you get.
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:18 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Mindez
Decorated

Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 165

As an example, we may get some super-secret information from Foo.

In game, there's no way we'd post it anywhere. However, we do, for the sake of discussion, keeping everything together, so that the other people on Foo's side can work on it and help.

Meanwhile, suppose it's the job of the Brackin's to get this super-secret information from us. With things the way they are, the Brackin's can just take it off of the forum and say they got it some other way. Pretend they infiltrated us, etc.

My system would make them do it as they are supposed to do it; get Foo's trust, contact the Gatekeepers, and get the discussion on the super-secret-information that way.

The only difference I'm proposing is to post Foo-secret stuff to a Foo section, and Brackin-secret stuff to a Brackin section. Anything that wasn't specifically Foo or Brackin-secretive would still be posted to a public board, for public discussion on.

Is that not the way the game is supposed to be played? The Foo side can contact each other, the Brackin side can contact each other, and discuss what they have to "keep to themselves" in secret from the other side, and whatever they can make public, they talk about in public.

I take "play both sides" to mean that you spy on both sides, getting the trust of Foo and of Brackin, and being able to read everything.

That's all, it's just a way to ensure that you're on their side before you can read the super-secret-stuff.
_________________
http://www.twitter.com/mindez
http://www.youtube.com/mindez


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:28 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
krystyn
I Never Tire of My Own Voice


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 3651
Location: Is not Chicago

There is a faint chiming sound, off in the distance, which happens to be my brain shattering into a thousand pieces and falling onto the floor.
_________________
Alternate Currency
Stories and dreams, crossing my palm like silver.

xbl gamertag: krystyn


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:34 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
GuyIncognito
Decorated


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 295

We definitely need a way to share information & communicate IG.
Personally, I'm not too sure about a seperate IG-forum, though. I agree with most of the points imbri raised above and also...if many players would try to "play both sides", wouldn't that again defeat the purpose and practical use of seperate sections on a forum?

How about two IG IRC-channels, #Foo and #Brackin, to begin with? And maybe an additional OOG channel? Just to see how it goes...

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Mindez
Decorated

Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 165

GuyIncognito wrote:
How about two IG IRC-channels, #Foo and #Brackin, to begin with? And maybe an additional OOG channel? Just to see how it goes...


Great idea!

We already have #deuscity, this can be the general OOG/public IG channel.

So, someone should just create #deusfoo and #deusbrackin

I can do #deusfoo, but I'm not on Brackin's side so I can't do that one Razz
_________________
http://www.twitter.com/mindez
http://www.youtube.com/mindez


PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:41 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
djsampson
Unfettered


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 393
Location: INDY

I don't see why we on both sides build a wiki or something to but top secret info on. and we could PM the address to the agents only on that side or something I really don't understand why this has become such a big deal. IF the Pm's really wanted to they could have lied and said that there was a traitor that gave Brakin the info when there really wasn't. One way or another we are going to get our info, If no one would have betrayed Foo then what happens Our side of the game ends? No, they would make up a so called undercover operative and give us the needed info.


Well I started a private Myspace page for the Attackin Brackins. So that way we can have some place to discuss privileged info. That way We can post info and not worry about it being miss used on UF I suggest that the Foo fighters do the same if they are that hard up about there info.


If you think that this is a good idea please let me know and I will update the page further.

www.myspace.com/130585438
_________________
I take your reality and substitute it with my own! -Mythbusters

PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:47 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [15 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Deus City » DC: Deus City
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group