Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:54 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: MetaCortechs » MetaCortechs: Puzzles
[PUZZLE??] How to "test" what AI Man's purpose is?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 5 of 6 [83 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
King Mob
Decorated


Joined: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 289
Location: England

I posted this spec. here in the puzzles section concerning the BRUTUS files, but I thought I'd post it here as well:

http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=29840#29840

Considering the correlation between Caesar's post (Brutus.jpg, mentioning the increase in whomps) and Beth's log (09:22 - 14:01, concerning her tests on AI Man) does this confirm for us then that AI Man is responsible for these mysterious whomps and, more to the point, that he is doing something far more significant that simply altering Beth's perception of the world? I mean if he was just altering her perception, surely that wouldn't have the massive effect that it does, resulting in the whomps that the paintover hackers have been studying?

EDIT: I just realised that there are two types of whomps - those produced by AI Man (see above) and those produced by whoever is trying to catch him (MetaCortechs? Kat?), and which almost killed Texel. But it doesn't seem the hackers are aware yet of the two different types of whomp.
_________________
Nothing is more discouraging than unappreciated sarcasm.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 10:24 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
bakntime
Unfettered

Joined: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 462
Location: back in time

King Mob wrote:

Considering the correlation between Caesar's post (Brutus.jpg, mentioning the increase in whomps) and Beth's log (09:22 - 14:01, concerning her tests on AI Man) does this confirm for us then that AI Man is responsible for these mysterious whomps and, more to the point, that he is doing something far more significant that simply altering Beth's perception of the world? I mean if he was just altering her perception, surely that wouldn't have the massive effect that it does, resulting in the whomps that the paintover hackers have been studying?

EDIT: I just realised that there are two types of whomps - those produced by AI Man (see above) and those produced by whoever is trying to catch him (MetaCortechs? Kat?), and which almost killed Texel. But it doesn't seem the hackers are aware yet of the two different types of whomp.


That's pretty much what it sounds like to me. Perhaps the whomps are the result of needing a significant amount of "processor power" to perform these translocations/manipulations that are going on.

Either way, it's clear that all of these "glitches" (by AI Man and the Monitors) are causing the whomps.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 1:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

hey everybody this time im coming with something serious maybe Rolling Eyes
i dont use irc or whatever and cannot contact beth directly but i have a few ideas someone could ask for me.
can he manipulate things on a molecular scale, on atomic, or electromagneticly? can he make something spontaniously combust?
next try the morpheus approach
touch him see if he is real to you
if he is real to you then the things you see can also be assumed to be real
if you chose to do so
do you think he is any diffrent than you any more important?
is it because he can do things that beth cannot
why cant she?
maybe we should ask beth if she could try manipulating something
if she believed this all to be real then why cant she do these things?
Wink
if he can read beths mind and manipulate the world around him to fit his whims would this not mean they are connected in some fashion even if it is arbitrary.
somethings can be true and false at the same time!
im just waiting for ai man to want outta the box
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 1:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

just got back from the restroom and i had an idea
we still dont know where our missing man is
could it be possible he his wife and child were reprogrammed
his wife and kid keeping the same mind just diffrent memories
as for avery maybe he was deleted
had a meeting with the merovingian
got a new shell and forgot everything!
i doubt it o well i think my brain has officially just quit on me im coming up with diffrent ideas same senarios
S
Mad
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
WedgeGold
Decorated


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 229
Location: East Coast

Hmmmm

Mendax XIII wrote:
Edit - Can we get Beth to suggest to AI man that he contacts Texel and her friends so they can assist in defining his purpose as they have been chasing whomps

Just a thought... Just a thought ...


I don't know if we should expose our hacker friends to Paul (AIman). For all we know Paul is an agent and his program is to track them down. Although Paul seems to have different abilities than the agents we know of outseide the game. Agents can only go from person to person, not place to place.

I can't wait to get home and IM Beth. I have a few things to ask.
_________________
There is no Spoon... Or Fork....
Just a Spork.

MetaUrchins


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

wedge i hate to be a nag
when you im her please
ask her my questions
i would be very happy
and not so at a loss
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:07 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
WedgeGold
Decorated


Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 229
Location: East Coast

ok

surfloser wrote:
wedge i hate to be a nag
when you im her please
ask her my questions
i would be very happy
and not so at a loss


Okie Dokie. I'll see what I can do.
_________________
There is no Spoon... Or Fork....
Just a Spork.

MetaUrchins


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
amiantos
Boot

Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 23

If I remember correctly, paul/root@little-boxes.net admits that the whomps are his doing, but the whomp that Texel got caught in was a virus created by the Monitors. You might wanna read up the files Beth sent to Phillip's metadex. Mr. AI Man actually sent Elizabeth an email on the 13th saying he wouldn't be seeing her again for her safety.... guess that idea fell through.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
yanka
Fickle


Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 1214
Location: undesirable

People had already asked her about James (I know Omnie did). Anyway, from what I remember she said that heismissing is Avery, sheismissing is his ex-wife Lynne; and she "beleived the resignation story" at first, but now she's not sure what to think. She thinks their son might be with them. Oh, actually, can somebody ask her what their son's name was?
So, then she said that Dimitri and James were great friends, and that she thought that Marcus was looking for him about something work-related, but now she's not sure.

I think she doesn't like to steer off-topic; as far as I've seen, she either changes the subject or just doesn't answer when people are not talking about the AI man, and especially when they start offering her information.

Smile
_________________
Annushka has already bought the sunflower oil, and has not only bought it, but has already spilled it.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
surfloser
Veteran

Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 118

sorry guys just thinking to much or not enough one of the two
shooting them down like clay disks you are
wiser than yoda are you
_________________
Question everything

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:28 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
xnbomb
Unfettered


Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 660
Location: J302B S8JDC

A forest physics testing suite

I'm quoting Trip from another topic, but as I started writing this, I realize my post belongs here:

trip wrote:
If he was able to remove her perception of the fire's heat, but really there was still heat there, the items would have burned. So, I think we can be pretty sure that he is ACTUALLY changing the heat of the fire, rather than just Beth's perception of it.

Trip, I think this is exactly the right idea. I've been contemplating a series of tests for Beth and her friend to try that might be instructive as to his nature (or perhaps the nature of reality) that all take advantage of the apparently temporary nature of his actions:

Some initial assumptions: From what we've been told, Beth's friend seems physical to her in the sense that she can touch him, and he feels just like any other person. Furthermore, it seems the effect of what he does is temporary ... after 10 minutes or so, things revert to as they were before. Hopefully the degree to which his actions have temporary physical consequences is not related to how unusual they they are, because I want to start with some fairly mundane (seeming) stuff. I wonder if that temporary nature applies to everything he does in a physical sense. I find it hard to believe that his nature would distinguish between 'normal' and exceptional physical interaction with reality, but even if this is the case, we can manage:

1) Beth gets her friend to pick up an object and move it from one place to another, say a fallen branch, as those should be plentiful. For at least the first 10 minutes, Beth might be able to see and feel the branch in its new position (whether her friend is influencing her perception or it is actually there ... I don't want to take that issue on directly right now). But after we pass the time limit of his effect, it should suddenly cease to be in its new position and revert to the old if everything he does is temporary.

2) If we find that an object that he moves conventionally (by picking it up and placing it somewhere else) does not obey his temporary limitation, then repeat the test by having him translocate said object without physically touching it. Surely then he has done something 'exceptional' that violates the normal rules of physical reality, and the object must revert to its normal position after his effect wears off. Comparing the results of this test to those of the previous one may tell us if her friend only can affect physical reality in one way, or if there is some delimitation between him doing things that 'normal' physical beings can do, and doing things that require 'changing the code' which seems to be temporary.

3) Now we take it a step further, and use an operation that theoretically should not be reversible under normal circumstances. Have him pick up a fallen branch and snap it in half, and then put it back down. After some duration, does it become whole again? Again, if his doing it conventionally with his hands produces a result that we'd consider normal (you break a branch in two ... it stays broken, right?), then have him break it again without touching it (use the force Root Very Happy ).

4) And further still: Beth breaks a branch in two. This way we know that branch is really broken (at least, it is based on our usual definitions of how our world works). Beth gives it to her friend and asks him to make it whole again. I imagine he can at least temporarily make it whole, but would it stay whole or revert to being in two pieces? It would probably revert to being broken.

5) Now a combination test, that is more or less interesting depending on the results of the previous ones: Her friend breaks a branch, and puts it back together. Which state does it revert to after the 10 minutes expire? This may depend on the timing of the two actions and how he does the breaking (with hands or 'code-changing') ... but how to construct this test usefully really depends on the results of the previous ones. By these tests, I'm trying to see how his temporary effect interacts with conventional notions of entropy and the (usually) allowed transitions between states that govern matter moving forward in time in our world.

6) Now for a test that ups the ante a fair bit: If her friend kills a living thing, does it stay dead? This again should be tested by his killing it conventionally and then through exceptional means. The ideal test subjects would be mosquitos ( Evil or Very Mad die bloodsucker!), but it's a little cold out there at this time of year so finding appropriate test subjects could be a problem. Beth is going to hate me for this, but I hope the bugs are still out ... we need their help Very Happy . So, her friend would swat one in the first instance, and then maybe instantaneously increase the air pressure in a small pocket around another to crush it (man, if I could have one super power ... Very Happy ). The death of an organism should be a very irreversible operation (unless of course that organism has more in common with a branch than a person). I am by no means suggesting Laika be used for mortality testing Exclamation

7) And finally, Beth kills something alive, say a mosquito (I can't think of any other test subject that would not produce widespread moral objections, and even for those I bet I'll get a few ... but for those of you who feel that way, let me write this: I've lost a lot of blood to those parasites {and their cousins, black flies}. It's war, and in war there are casualties). She gets her friend to bring one that she swats back to life. Will it seem alive for 10 minutes and then drop dead, or maybe suddenly reappear where it was when it died? They might have to do this one inside a tent ... otherwise they might be chasing a reanimated mosquito for 10 minutes Laughing .

That's probably enough for now, although I can think of more. These should tell us some things about Beth's friend's limitations and rules when it comes to interacting with matter in reality.

(Alright, I admit it. My perverse mind is thinking about putting Laika inside the tent out of view, and having her friend ... translocate Laika far away temporarily (fooled ya). Is Laika in the tent or not? Is she half there? Maybe she's chasing Schroedinger's cat around in some quantum limbo).

(EDIT: Oh ... and a serious noodle-bender depending on how previous tests work out: Beth and her friend each hold one side of a branch. The two them break the branch together, both providing some of the force that breaks the branch. Did she break the branch or did he? Will it follow normal rules and stay broken or will it revert to being whole? That might create a paradox. )
_________________
My location is a little tricky, but sooner or later, you'll get the knack.

{J302B S8JDC, 8996N M8L4W, 92D40 Q1JX5, 4PPRN R2B97, 8DC7C NZJNV, 8CH7V Q891H}


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:36 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
AnthraX101
Entrenched

Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Posts: 797

I asked her something similar last night, but forgot to post the logs. I mentioned it in that other thread, I asked her if the sticks remained unburned after the heat came back from the fire (implying that the perception changes wore off). She answered that they did indeed remain the same as before. Your questions, of course, go much more in depth, and make sure some of his perception changes arn't permanent. Smile

AnthraX101

EDIT: And also, It might be that he is indeed "there" and can exert normal force on nature (As I would suspect, because he never dissappears after the perception changes are gone). So him moving the branch with his hands may make said branch stay moved, while him moving it with his mind may make it revert to its old location. Now here's a question, what happens to that space once the branch moves back to its original location? If your hand was there, would you have a stick embeded in it?
_________________
VGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gc3Bvb24u
ll----ll--ll--ll----l---ll---llll---ll--l--ll---llll-ll-l-ll-llll--l-.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:50 pm
Last edited by AnthraX101 on Tue Nov 18, 2003 12:59 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
King Mob
Decorated


Joined: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 289
Location: England

Although you have proposed some really good tests there Xnbomb, I'd just like to point out that, as regards your first test, it has already been proven - Paul/AI Man can effect physical reality (as real it gets in the Matrix anyway). He did this when he rescued Texel, otherwise she would have surely reverted back to the site of the whomp.
However, Beth would probably have to carry out the first test anyway so as to give her something with which to compare your second test.
_________________
Nothing is more discouraging than unappreciated sarcasm.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 3:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Insomniac
Decorated


Joined: 14 Oct 2003
Posts: 234
Location: 01

chancesend wrote:

My theory is: An error exception handler. An error handler would need to be at the site of a system fault at the drop of a hat, and would need to be able to disrupt/bend the laws of physics in various ways in order to be able to recover from an error. The AI could be a sort of "policeman" for other AI programs, terminating any that crash. Or the AI could be a sort of pacemaker for the world, keeping everything clean and preventing catastrophic events.


hmmm deja vu Confused ...

When I read this I imediately thought of that episode in the animatrix (Beyond?) where there is that "haunted house" an apparent "error" or "glitch" where everything is not as it should be and that big red truck shows up with the agent who tells them to clen up the site.

I know this has been said before somewhere regarding a different topic but this is what I thought of when I read the above quote.
_________________
"I find it kind of funny, I find it kind of sad.
The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had."


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 4:00 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
King Mob
Decorated


Joined: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 289
Location: England

Chancesend's theory certainly would explain why AI Man/Paul would need to have a type of 'scan' ability; he scans the Matrix, much like we have on our computers, looking for errors, etc.
But if Chancesend's theory is correct, then either AI Man was captured by MetaCortechs (perhaps after he lost his memory? Or lost his memory after breaking out?) or MetaCortechs is in cahoots with the Architect.
_________________
Nothing is more discouraging than unappreciated sarcasm.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 4:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 6 [83 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: MetaCortechs » MetaCortechs: Puzzles
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group