Author
Message
niobexrev
Unfettered
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 428 Location: trapped in my bedroom vortex
Mayalla wrote:
Except for the FLAQ. That is still right way up.
Er, only when you flip it yourself. But it's upside down to begin with.
_________________
Metacortex
ALL JPGs and GIFs updated 11.22.03 with endgame pics
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:15 pm
Mayalla
Boot
Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 54
niobexrev wrote:
Mayalla wrote:
Except for the FLAQ. That is still right way up.
Er, only when you flip it yourself. But it's upside down to begin with.
Nope.. I couldn't get into it at first and when I tried again it was the right way up. I didn't do nuttin'
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:18 pm
flavin
Boot
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 12
the original flaq was flipped (opposite of faq),
so... when you flip something that is flipped,
you get something not flipped, which is true of the current flaq (still opposite of faq)
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:48 pm
King Mob
Decorated
Joined: 15 Nov 2003 Posts: 289 Location: England
flavin wrote:
the original flaq was flipped (opposite of faq),
so... when you flip something that is flipped,
you get something not flipped, which is true of the current flaq (still opposite of faq)
I think you've all flipped!
_________________Nothing is more discouraging than unappreciated sarcasm.
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 8:17 pm
Miss Starchild
Boot
Joined: 25 Oct 2003 Posts: 55 Location: Brazil
I use avant browser and everything's flipped here. I actually liked it, never tought that a page flipped could look so different. As someone said, it doesn't even seems it's written in English.
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 8:51 pm
Darkshadow
Boot
Joined: 03 Nov 2003 Posts: 44 Location: Pawtucket, RI
flavin wrote:
the original flaq was flipped (opposite of faq),
so... when you flip something that is flipped,
you get something not flipped, which is true of the current flaq (still opposite of faq)
No, the flaq page was upside-down. It was flipped like all of the other pages. It looks normal because it is an upside down page that's flipped.
_________________<a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&id=2309&t=1">Get Firefox, the browser you can trust.</a>
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:42 pm
flavin
Boot
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 12
Darkshadow wrote:
No, the flaq page was upside-down. It was flipped like all of the other pages. It looks normal because it is an upside down page that's flipped.
...that's what i said/meant. (i said not-flipped to descripe what it looks like, and to mean that's it right side up, because it was flipped)
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 10:48 pm
yeahyeah
Decorated
Joined: 14 Oct 2003 Posts: 282
I meant to say that the flaq is now flipped and is 'right side up' as in readable :)
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 12:37 am
Miss Starchild
Boot
Joined: 25 Oct 2003 Posts: 55 Location: Brazil
Okay, can we all agree that the page is looking different?
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:38 am
Nursie
Boot
Joined: 05 Nov 2003 Posts: 64 Location: London, UK
Miss Starchild wrote:
Okay, can we all agree that the page is looking different?
That depends
Actually, using firebird, they all look the right way up (including faq and flaq)
But I can see what you're talking about when using IE.
_________________Signatures suck.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:44 am
ParityBit
Decorated
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 168 Location: London Above
Nursie wrote:
Actually, using firebird, they all look the right way up (including faq and flaq)
But I can see what you're talking about when using IE.
Is the flip thing an IE only CSS attribute? (Firebird user too). Or is it part of the CSS spec that Mozilla is lagging behind in?
Hmmm, instead of asking the question, I had a look for myself - couldn't find 'filter' within the CSS spec, so I am guessing it is IE only.
Possibly this is another thing to hold against the CV - I can't imagine the PMs would deliberately exclude Mozilla users, but the dodgy owners of the Vortex site would.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:56 pm
BrianEnigma
Entrenched
Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 1199 Location: Pacific Northwest
ParityBit wrote:
Is the flip thing an IE only CSS attribute? (Firebird user too). Or is it part of the CSS spec that Mozilla is lagging behind in?
Yep, it's Microsoft "extending and embracing" standards to lock people into accidentally using IE-only features. The specific CSS is "filter: flipv." That's not in the 2.1 spec . I don't know the 3.0 proposed spec too well, but I saw nothing in a quick search through it.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 10:34 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending