Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:56 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: World Without Oil
[META] Those of us living in major urban areas
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
Author Message
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

[META] Those of us living in major urban areas
What to do?

I have to say that suggestions about moving of onto my own land so I can grow my own crops isn't at all appealing to me. If I wanted to live like that I would have stayed in Ohio not worked hard so I could move to New York. Smile

I really believe that the best way to prepare for a crises is for people to move to places where it is easy to get mutual support, you can walk or bike anywhere you need to go, plentiful mass transit, and where there is a community.

Maybe this should go into a blog post to submit to them - but I don't have any really good answers about how to live in a city without oil. The peak oil movement seems to be all about "taking care of yourself" and "self-sufficiency" but it doesn't have much to say about "taking care of each other" and "interdependent living in a community." The worse thing that can happen in a crises is that people start fending for themselves with out caring about anyone else.

I don't have a live journal account, I guess I may need one so I can post comments. I also don't want to be a negative whiner on their blog. Wink

Edit: OK I created a live journal account, but now they have to friend me so I can make a comment. Here is what I was going to say:

Quote:
I understand that some people may choose to live in rural isolation, or relative isolation, and "self-sufficiency" regarding growing their own food. That is great for them and I totally respect that choice. I'm just not one of those people.

Here is a great article from this month's Wired, which discusses how much easier it is to create energy efficiency in a more densely populated environment. They designed a system that is totally green and self-powered. Where does the energy come from? Burning rice husks.

Article: China Plans the City of the Future: It's Big, Green and Quick to Build
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.05/feat_popup.html


Anyway, I will work on this later tonight or tomorrow morning. Have a great day everyone. Smile
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:52 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
xnera
Veteran


Joined: 03 Jun 2006
Posts: 79

A general FYI for everybody: They have the community's options set so that only members of the community can comment. This means if you want to comment on the WWO LiveJournal, you need to create a LiveJournal account (it's free!) and join the community.

But you don't necessarily need a LiveJournal to comment on other WWO-related LJ posts. For example, I have my comment settings set to allow "anonymous" comments, so anybody can select "anonymous" and leave a comment in my journal. If you have an account on a system that has an OpenID server, you can also sign in with your OpenID account to leave a comment in my journal.

If anybody has any questions about how LiveJournal works, feel free to PM me. I'm a former LJ Support Volunteer so I'm quite familiar with how LJ works.

Okay, enough about LJ Smile I agree that we need to think about taking care of each other and community living. Unfortunately I don't have any really good ideas at the moment, but I'll think about it.
_________________
Watching A World Without Oil and Perplex City
PXC Trades | You, too, can edit the PXC Wiki!


PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:48 am
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
labfly
Unfettered


Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 717
Location: nyc or the haunted house in maine

multiple uses for fuel cells and turbines
cal state northridge and nyc shows us the way

although i don't have time to play along, i've been lurking and mulling about this issue of how to live in urban areas. i think the fuel cell is one of the many solutions. although many people believe the technology is not yet available, quite the opposite is true. Cal State Northridge is using fuel cells right now and the results are amazing. there are also some great organizations in NY that are already tackling these questions. below is part of an article about Cal State's fuel cell and a couple links to orgs and articles that talk about how ny can and is now going green. wind turbines are fantastic for Manhattan. actually there are water turbines in the east river that are already supplying power to NY from the river currents -- we just need more and more alternatives such as this. rooftop gardens are also essential... community gardens could become huge in ny. so now i'm rambling.. sorry. Wink

Quote:
Cal State Northridge fuel cell power plant now online
February 28, 2007

Southern California Gas Co. has presented a $2.2 million incentive check to California State University at Northridge (Cal State Northridge) for what appears to be the single largest fuel-cell power plant at any university campus in the world.

The 1-megawatt, $5.8 million project was commissioned last Friday. The fuel cell generates enough electricity to power 800 homes.

The university purchased the high-efficiency Direct FuelCell (DFC®) power plant from FuelCell Energy, Inc. (NasdaqNM: FCEL), based in Connecticut.

The plant will generate base load electricity for the university's facilities and surplus heat for buildings, showers and food service hot water, and for heating the University Student Union's swimming pool.

College of Engineering and Computer Science faculty and students are actively studying the energy production and overall efficiency of the plant.

The power plant is also providing an opportunity for students in the College of Science and Mathematics to study the carbon dioxide enrichment potential on plant life provided by the power plant to the university's greenhouse. University officials are routing carbon dioxide exhaust from the plant's heat exchanger into an adjacent miniature sub-tropical rainforest developed specifically to be sustained by the fuel cell plant's operation.


http://www.greenhomenyc.org/
http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/20040105/200/817
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18096246/

Quote:
in Battery Park City, stands a residential high-rise billed as one of the most environmentally friendly in any city in the world. The Solaire, which opened last summer(2003), features solar panels that provide five percent of the building's electricity; water for the toilets that has been recycled from the showers, sinks and dishwashers; and paints and adhesives that have no toxic or carcinogenic chemicals.

_________________
r u a sammeeeee? yep.
resident of Snow Town
(friend of Peeps & Peg)


PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 11:29 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
KSG
Decorated


Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 186
Location: WA, USA

The self-sufficiency push is based on the idea that oil is our main transportation method, so if that goes away, your tie to people you rely on is gone. The only reason crowded city living is possible is because there is transport between the city, which consumes far more than it produces, and the farms, which produce more food than their owners consume. Being best buddies with everyone in the apartment building will only get you food if the rest of them have some to spare.

You are right that the community push is a message missing from a lot of the talk. The community push would be making up for people, not materials, that you don't have access to. Basically, everyone needs to know first aid, and you should know which apartments have doctors and nurses in them. The emphasis away from this and onto self-sufficiency is probably there because most people see eating as a more immediate need than health care.
_________________
The WikiWebComic Wiki: The Comic! (The webcomic that anyone can, um, wiki!)
Previously: Perplexed | Team Tollin | Lokitier
Sorta-Kinda-Half-Played: ACWE | Geist
Current: YZ, WWO


PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:08 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Rekidk
Entrenched


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 992
Location: Indiana, USA

I think that pushing for self-dependency would defeat the purpose of this game. After all, weren't we all told that the point of this was collaboration and community--working together to solve a problem?

I'd find it quite odd if we worked together to decide to stay apart.
_________________
iTube - iTweet - iNetwork

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:58 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
KSG
Decorated


Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 186
Location: WA, USA

I thought the teamwork was in the form of ideas and information, not actually feeding each other. I've yet to see someone feed someone else via LiveJournal. A big part of the problem is, in fact, that without oil you become very limited in the number of people you can work with.
_________________
The WikiWebComic Wiki: The Comic! (The webcomic that anyone can, um, wiki!)
Previously: Perplexed | Team Tollin | Lokitier
Sorta-Kinda-Half-Played: ACWE | Geist
Current: YZ, WWO


PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:22 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Rekidk
Entrenched


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 992
Location: Indiana, USA

I agree that we can't feed eachother via LiveJournal--however, the 'community' and 'togetherness' of ARGing in general certainly makes me think that people would be willing to work together to help eachother.

I was referring to (and elaborating on) this quote in-particular:

rose wrote:
The worse thing that can happen in a crises is that people start fending for themselves with out caring about anyone else.


I agree with her. Smile
_________________
iTube - iTweet - iNetwork

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:43 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
OrangeForAHead
Boot

Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 24
Location: Santa Cruz, California, United States, Earth, Sol, Orion Spur, Milky Way

Sorry, I've been busy with midterms and projects, but I hijacked an idea. Day Without Gas, May 15th. That's not this Tuesday but the one after. You guys think it's an alright idea? If so, we have to take action immediately to make everyone aware. It could work, really!

PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 11:47 pm
Last edited by OrangeForAHead on Sat May 05, 2007 7:12 pm; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
jwiv
Decorated


Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 175
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: [META] Those of us living in major urban areas
What to do?

rose wrote:
I have to say that suggestions about moving of onto my own land so I can grow my own crops isn't at all appealing to me. If I wanted to live like that I would have stayed in Ohio not worked hard so I could move to New York. Smile

I really believe that the best way to prepare for a crises is for people to move to places where it is easy to get mutual support, you can walk or bike anywhere you need to go, plentiful mass transit, and where there is a community.

Maybe this should go into a blog post to submit to them - but I don't have any really good answers about how to live in a city without oil. The peak oil movement seems to be all about "taking care of yourself" and "self-sufficiency" but it doesn't have much to say about "taking care of each other" and "interdependent living in a community." The worse thing that can happen in a crises is that people start fending for themselves with out caring about anyone else.


I completely agree with what you've written here Rose. I've been trying to discuss a bit about community outreach programs starting to help the impoverished and other such things but yah, the majority of what's been going up has been focused on the more suburban/rural points of view. There's been some good discussion about what those in the urban areas can do to an extent, but the prevailing view seems to be that the cities are doomed, and I aim to see that point wrong.

In a way though, that's the point of the game and one of the questions we need to look into.

If we can't grow our own food, how do we ensure that food supplies are sufficient in the event of shortages and transportation disruptions?
_________________
While the Law of Fives is never wrong, I often am.

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:49 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Rogi Ocnorb
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 4266
Location: Where the cheese is free.

Living on the outer edge of the burbs, it's interesting hearing the urban perspective on these scenarios. Most people I know around here tend to keep greater quantities of life's essentials on hand than their more efficient urban cousins. Maybe it's just that we have more room or that getting things takes more effort, so we just tend to stock up. In my house, we have a fairly well-stocked pantry and even emergency rations and drinking water. We have a woodstove and a supply of wood, extra propane tanks, medicines, ammo, money and just a lot of stuff that would be hard to get in a panic. Bulk water for bathing, growing a garden, etc. would be a problem as would gasoline. And we could use a generator, if I were more convinced that there was a real need. I'm not at liberty to tell you about a certain forgotten mineshaft a half-dozen families will meet at if the balloon ever goes up.
Is there a point to all this? Well, I think I'm trying to say that people living on the fringes tend to be a little more self-sufficient while the cities tend to attract a lot of folks who have been raised in an entitlement environment. It would only take a small percentage of these types of folks to really ruin life for everyone. If they decide that they truly deserve the food or other convenience(s) your building/block/church/business has available, they will take it from you. Looting is pretty rare in the burbs. I know, that if I were to grow a garden, it would be just as easy for someone to raid it as it would be in the city (Easier, I'm sure) but probably less likely unless things went south on a grand scale.
I applaud your desire to find a way to make the city continue to run in a crisis, but if it were something happening on a nationwide scale, the government will be too busy making sure they're taken care of to be of much help to you and I really wouldn't want to be living there.
I'm not trying to poison the thought process involved in finding solutions related to weaning ourselves from "black gold", but I think the first step would be to think of ways to keep the public involved and working together and not against each other. We really don't have an "enemy" to galvanize our thoughts and actions against like we did in WW2, so that's a huge challenge.
Some will say that I have no faith in people and am too paranoid, but like I said, it only takes a few lazy/panicked/desperate people to ruin everyone's day.

ETA: Wanted to add this link to a primer on the hydrogen economy as it was mentioned earlier in the thread. Bottom line... It takes more electrical energy to split water and collect the hydrogen than the collected hydrogen can produce. The only currently feasable way of generating hydrogen on a large scale and not violate the laws of thermodynamics involves the use of a reformer and hydrocarbon-rich sources (oil). And guess where the "waste" CO2 from that process goes?

Until we build more nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, solar, wind, wave, etc. power generation facilities, fuel-cells are not the answer to our problems.
And if we're generating that kind of power, it makes more sense to switch over to as much electrically powered "stuff" as possible. It's much easier and safer to move electricity around than pressurized hydrogen and for things like cars, battery-electric cars are on the order of 3-4 times more efficient than their hydrogen fuel-cell counterparts.
_________________
I'm telling you now, so you can't say, "Oh, I didn't know...Nobody told me!"


PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 4:39 am
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Nola
Unfettered


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 675

Re: [META] Those of us living in major urban areas
What to do?

rose wrote:
I really believe that the best way to prepare for a crises is for people to move to places where it is easy to get mutual support, you can walk or bike anywhere you need to go, plentiful mass transit, and where there is a community.


Hey, that's why I moved to Amsterdam!

PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:57 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: World Without Oil
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group