View topic - [TRAILHEAD/CONTEST] SaveMyHusband.com

unforum
a.r.g.b.b

Welcome!

New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.

Website Restoration Project

This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.

Announcements

This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.

This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.

Our Esteemed Contributors

The time now is Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:25 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)

View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum

Calendar

Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: Save My Husband

[LOCKED] [TRAILHEAD/CONTEST] SaveMyHusband.com

Page 78 of 87 [1299 Posts]

Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, ..., 85, 86, 87 Next

Author

Message

dixiedooh
Boot

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 58
Location: northest region

most to lose?
humans are not ligical

I wish I could support your theory that the person/s who have the most to lose had to do it.

Let's talk REALITY: people have murdered people for ten or twenty bucks...while people who have had been really victimized still obey the law and don't harm a sole. So why in this 'reality game' would we expect human behavior to be so black and white.

Anyways...at this point it's not what someone has to lose...it's what someone has to gain....$2,000,000 dollars!

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:16 pm

joyjoy
Boot

Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 29

the.unnoticed wrote:

okay. something that hasn't been mentioned yet.. that kinda makes me think. If you watch todays video, during the press conference there are only 3 people on the platform. The Detective, Grant, and Christina.. MAX is missing!!!

Hopefully he was out getting that ugly @ss hair cut. LOL

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:18 pm

playboy_dust_bunny
Boot

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 38

Re: christina and Max being alone?
?

dixiedooh wrote:

I'm not sure I understand why police monitoring equipment would keep max from being behind the camera like has always been portrayed.

Please explain how this would physically draw max away from the camera he is assumed to be working and viewing through. I would be interested to know how you can dismiss that.

I don't think she seems to be looking quite that far away. Depending on the camera too, he might not be holding it up to his face but be holding it at arm's length. With a big, flippable LCD monitor, that's easy enough. And who to say she is actually look at max. She might be looking at a cop for confirmation she is doing the right thing as she instructs max. Or she might just be distracted by something out the big window she is facing. Have you never looked away from whom you are talking to?

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:22 pm

DJTAZ
Veteran

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 81
Location: Pa

okay keeping in topics of what Courttv has aired in their forensics as of late most have been about Kids teying to Kidnap themselves for Money.. or Killing parents for Money.. why wouldnt Max be a suspect?? and yes he was Missing during that press Confrence.. He also resembles that Kidnapper and sounds like.. from day 2 ransome video!

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:26 pm

Caine1379
Boot

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 24

Location
think I might be getting close

Wilmore Avenue anagrams: A Venue Lower MI (Michigan) or rowel, but I can't find a Rowel, MI

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:28 pm

dixiedooh
Boot

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 58
Location: northest region

more sonia finger pointing
more dirt

I must say I have gone through Sonia's blog a few times. But it's not enough just to do that, but also aplly it to all the other things going on.

Like the very first scene we see tulips. Now cross referencing to sonia's blog it we can pretty much see that she is Andrews unofficial "present inspector". Back again to the first scene...there are only five tulips in the vase. NOW who would give only five flowers instead of six or a dozen. WHo took the extra flower!?

And didn't the van that abducted Andrew look like on a florist would use for deliveries?

And another anogram......outlandish duet trap could mean 'kart handed out tulips"

anyone who says this is coincidence is not covering all the bases and is blinded by the advance notice of hacked info. I too believe the game will not end as previously outlined in e-mails which may not be sent.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:28 pm

playboy_dust_bunny
Boot

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 38

Re: most to lose?
humans are not ligical

dixiedooh wrote:

I didn't say it was absolute black and white. I was just referring to Occam's razor, which would dictate the simplist answer is most likely the right one. And I think that would lead us away from a hypothesis that relies on evidence that is only supposition.

I'm not convinced the ransom money was ever the big pay off for who planned the kidnapping. (As hinted, it seems it might be the 2 kidnappers' idea, not the one who planned the kidnapping.) It, as has been stated, might well just be the advantage of obfuscating information that if released in a timely manner would bring the company down.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:29 pm

playboy_dust_bunny
Boot

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 38

Re: more sonia finger pointing
more dirt

dixiedooh wrote:

I've not looked at the advance information. I'm just working this from a writer's angle of what would be a believable and satisfying story line in my eyes. I'm not dismissing anyone else's theories, I'm just stating why they didn't ring as strongly with me. I don't assume I'm right and anyone else is wrong. I've never played a game like this. I'm just working character development, as I said a writer, and what seems to be supported by characterization and motive.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:33 pm

KCD603
Greenhorn

Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5

the.unnoticed wrote:

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:34 pm

.MindFreak.
Boot

Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 16

Sharon_in_NC wrote:

420BLZ wrote:

He is yelling "Goodis is a fraud" just like he did in the third video. Referring to Andrew Goodis, the guy that was kidnapped. Why he would do it again like a idiot... I don't know. I do know I wouldn't want somebody like that working on my security detail though.

Are you SURE he said "Goodis"??

Yeah! You're right, Frank is yelling "Goodis is a fraud"

question is which goodis is frank talking about? maybe the wife is the head of the kidnapping not wanting to lose money if she has stock in the company where the stock skyrocketed and that downtown docks could be stocks down down just an idea maybe christinas the fraud...

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:35 pm
Last edited by .MindFreak. on Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:35 pm; edited 1 time in total

Guest
Guest

Maybe it was Sonia that got pregnant, and never told Andrew....the money he will be getting from Freevira will be hers also...if she does have his child.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:35 pm

DJTAZ
Veteran

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 81
Location: Pa

you know.. I really think we are Making too much out of alot of these so called "clues" I am sure... if we thought about what Court Tv has aired in the past it may just go along with what they are doing.. Wouldnt be the first time.. a station has done this... hehehehee.. just a thought Smile

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:36 pm

dixiedooh
Boot

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 58
Location: northest region

Re: christina and Max being alone?
?

playboy_dust_bunny wrote:

dixiedooh wrote:

She is looking FAR from the camera...not just to the side of the camera....i know the diference.

And when have you seen any evidence of a cop, and why would they keep it such a secret from us that they were there? When she got a quick e-mail from the detective....did you see any investigators come running to look over her shoulder? Nobody knew who was e-mailing her so you would have seen some action.

Remember....WE are not the kidnappers...so either she is telling us everything....or she and or max are involved and are keeping secrets.

Now isn't that what we're here to discuss? Evrything that's been said has it's merits, and what I've observed I thing is important. I didn't imagine that christine was not looking at wher max was supposed to be standing! PERIOD.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:36 pm

KCD603
Greenhorn

Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5

the.unnoticed wrote:

Max was video taping the conference....

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:39 pm

playboy_dust_bunny
Boot

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 38

Re: christina and Max being alone?
?

dixiedooh wrote:

playboy_dust_bunny wrote:

dixiedooh wrote:

Again, I never said your theories didn't have merit. Apparently you mistake what was provided as a sounding board for criticism. Sorry you can't tell the difference. And I still don't interpret her look as being all that far away. It depends on how close what she is looking at is and angles. Notice she also looks away at the very beginning of the message when she is not addressing Max. If you think the second glance away is something significant, then what does the first mean? She looks that time as she says the word "police." So using your thinking of the second look applied to the first, then she is looking at the police at that point?

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:40 pm

Display posts from previous: Sort by:

Page 78 of 87 [1299 Posts]

Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, ..., 85, 86, 87 Next

Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: Save My Husband

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum