Author
Message
confused
Guest
I am so no to this I didn't even know there was all this other info to find.
Question, is there something out there that has fingerprints on it? I have no idea where to look.
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:52 pm
konamouse
Official uF Dietitian
Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 8010 Location: My own alternate reality
confused wrote:
I am so no to this I didn't even know there was all this other info to find.
Question, is there something out there that has fingerprints on it? I have no idea where to look.
There will be. Because of the advanced information we got before the game started (because the websites and google cache information was not protected from good deductive reasoning) we know we're going to get something with a finger print on it and have to match it up to a suspect. Probably tomorrow or the last day.
_________________
'squeek'
r u a Sammeeeee? I am Forever!
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:05 pm
bl27552
Guest
FINGERPRINTS SETS OF PRINTS IN PERSONNEL IDS Not only Andrew but grant, sonia and frank are all in here among some others still trying to figure out what franks sisters name was dont see anything in obits, but cannot rule out some other member of franks family. i dont know if there is any way to go back and see old issues of the paper or if there are any old issues
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:12 pm
firelizard
Boot
Joined: 09 Jun 2007 Posts: 11
finger print well has anyone noticed that the prints/id numbers and names changed from what they were today ?? the above issue with grant id number confusion is because before the 9th 00927009=Grant Tenbrook was correct but today it was changed to 00927019=Grant Tenbrook
as well as 3 others plus the ones from 00927014 up are new today.
now here is a twist up to today grant had a print on file but now that print goes to Robert Johnson.
mabey the who did it has changed now too ! since if one of the prints matches one they changed then the bad guy is back to a mystery for all !!
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:42 pm
unclet7
Guest
fingerprint shuffle The hidden fingerprints have actually been up for awhile(not just added). Most likely shuffled during the outage in order to keep us honest. The organizers have been aware of hacks and playaheads and anticipated this.(to a certain degree). I have to support the criminal record theory for those that are visible since the Det. stated in one of the texts that the fingerprint on the threatening letters were not found when the police checked them against their own records, but they were identified as Frank after his arrest (his record is hidden- in the non-criminal batch as is Grant, Andrew, and Jim Gaffney). Notice that Carson and Sonia (both high on the speculation list ) are both visible. Not much hard evidence to support it at this time but it works into a good circumstancial theory.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 1:35 am
KermieD
Veteran
Joined: 16 Mar 2003 Posts: 70
The police checked the fingerprints on the threatening letters and they didn't match criminal databases.
_________________There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness -- Dave Barry
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 1:41 am
visionofangels
Veteran
Joined: 06 Jun 2007 Posts: 99
f-prints
KermieD wrote:
The police checked the fingerprints on the threatening letters and they didn't match criminal databases.
I thought Christina said the prints matched the guy who was arrested? Frank Calori?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 1:46 am
KermieD
Veteran
Joined: 16 Mar 2003 Posts: 70
Yes. As such, we can guess that Frank didn't have a criminal record prior to his arrest, which occured after the video statement that the police had drawn a blank on the prints.
Since Frank's prints are on the akarm site and were on there prior to that arrest (and since Frank is no longer an employee), we should also be able to surmise that the criteria for inclusion aren't just based on a prior criminal record.
_________________There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness -- Dave Barry
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:25 am
TXVisitor
Guest
Frank's fingerprint is not pictured on the site. I was before they changed the site but now it isn't.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:34 am
Absynth
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 79 Location: Undisclosed
KermieD wrote:
Yes. As such, we can guess that Frank didn't have a criminal record prior to his arrest, which occured after the video statement that the police had drawn a blank on the prints.
Since Frank's prints are on the akarm site and were on there prior to that arrest (and since Frank is no longer an employee), we should also be able to surmise that the criteria for inclusion aren't just based on a prior criminal record.
and based on those facts, we can deduce that if we tell the cops (when it is actually time, of course) about the site and there they will find the match of the fingerprint they need.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
not really a spoiler but i wanted to hide my prediction.
i dont think the print will match Frank's, since hes in police custody, but since were all assuming its his print they need (which doesnt make any sense at all to me, since they have arrested him this morning. they would have printed him when they booked him) so im pretty sure the print will match someone on the site, but it wont be frank's
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:35 am
KermieD
Veteran
Joined: 16 Mar 2003 Posts: 70
Correct. That will be a "puzzle" for tomorrow or the next day. I was responding to the comment that only those who had a criminal record were fingerprinted on the site, which can't be the case for the story to be internally consistent.
_________________There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness -- Dave Barry
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:37 am
TXVisitor
Guest
I repeat ... Frank's fingerprint is not pictured on the site which would support a theory of only those with a criminal record are pictured. Unless, of course, they change the fingerprint site yet again!
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:42 am
Absynth
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 79 Location: Undisclosed
TXVisitor wrote:
I repeat ... Frank's fingerprint is not pictured on the site which would support a theory of only those with a criminal record are pictured. Unless, of course, they change the fingerprint site yet again!
but if you go to the site theres actually 2 sets of franks fingerprints now... they keep changing it up on us since they know were paying attention to it before the actual time were sposed to.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
try these ID #'s 00927020 and 00927021 they both came up Frank Caluori just a second ago
they are gonna change it again im sure, but frank DOES have a criminal record now, so maybe they will move it over to where we can actually seee it, and it would support the criminal record theory. but i still dont think thats the reason we can see some, and not all the prints
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:50 am
KermieD
Veteran
Joined: 16 Mar 2003 Posts: 70
Good point, TX. It did go down to 15 prints pictured, even though Frank's is still there if you search past #15 (as is Grant's). However, I don't think it's pertinent. From what I gather from Jabroni's posts (who's the guy who cracked this up front), it doesn't appear they're going to get that deep. Every change they've made so far once they found out their mystery was already solved has been cosmetic at best.
_________________There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness -- Dave Barry
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:53 am
TXVisitor
Guest
TYPO???
Absynth wrote:
but if you go to the site theres actually 2 sets of franks fingerprints now... they keep changing it up on us since they know were paying attention to it before the actual time were sposed to.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
try these ID #'s 00927020 and 00927021 they both came up Frank Caluori just a second ago
You might have made a typo, I'm still showing
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
00927020 is Jeremy Hild and 00927021 is Frank
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:05 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending