View topic - [TRAILHEAD] Part 2

unforum
a.r.g.b.b

Welcome!

New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.

Website Restoration Project

This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.

Announcements

This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.

This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.

Our Esteemed Contributors

The time now is Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:32 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)

View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum

Calendar

Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: Save My Husband

[TRAILHEAD] Part 2

Page 42 of 116 [1737 Posts]

Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, ..., 114, 115, 116 Next

Author

Message

sleepless
Decorated

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Re: Videos - Another Theory

TXVisitor wrote:

Great thinking Dixiedooh! But, have you considered this.Since the video of Grant is the one that skips time and the lights are also on in the office, could it be that:
1. Sonia was there at approx 8am (like the time stamp indicates).
2. Later in the day, when people might be at work and lights might be on in the office, Grant came in after someone was there (Andrew maybe which is why stuff on the desk has changed) and left the note. Maybe his time stamp should be approx 2pm instead of 4am.
3. That night Frank comes in.

That would coincide with the order of the web addresses .2, .3 and .4

There's one problem with your theory. If you review Christine's tape of today you'll notice she has spent the whole night going through hours of video tapes and she only presented these 3 tapes that strike her as suspicious. If Grant had come back into the office at a later time then she would have included that video.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:30 am

dixiedooh
Boot

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 58
Location: northest region

Re: to: dixiedooh
Ishould be asleep!

sleepless wrote:

re: dixiepooh says:" used everything to theorize my hypothesis...including the lights being on or off...and the water and fruit on Andrews desk....he was gone after that....and that means he left before sonia's 8:15 AM visit to the office."

Good theory, and you may be right, but supposing someone removed it to hide their fingerprints? Or Sonia removed the water bottle to clean up the boss's desk?

My theory is that Grant came in and removed something. Perhaps he left a note for Sonia or for Andrew or perhaps that note was intended to make him look innocent. Sonia did send Andrew an email to meet her and we don't know if that email went out before Andrew came to work or during the course of the day. Anyway, that seems to be neither here nor there since the ultimate question is: Who did it? and Where is Andrew being held?

Gee ...seems like I just said goodnight!

anyways...one last trip to check the thread has me back on.

Ya-know....sleepless made a good point. It seems to me that there is almost TOO much time and attention on Grant, Sonia, and Frank...and they are so up front and visible...that how could they have the time to be kidnappers.

I was wondering also if someone could help clear up the goal of this game. Did they say we needed to find those responsible for the kidnapping? And if they did does that mean the actual kidnappers or someone who hired them to do it. It almost seems too vague for me, so I will rely on everyone's consolidated opinions

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:33 am

sleepless
Decorated

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Today's answer

DO NOT LOOK IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW TODAY'S ANSWER:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):

04:34:26 to 04:34:58

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:36 am

dixiedooh
Boot

Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 58
Location: northest region

Re: Videos - Another Theory

sleepless wrote:

TXVisitor wrote:

your theories definitely have some truth ringing to them. I have to admit though..when i first saw the videos, my very first thought was that chrsitine must have something to do with it because of the little information she gave us and the police. She made a judgement to withold all but what she wanted everyone to see. I know if I was in that situation I would be handing EVERYTHING over and DEMANDING they go through it over and over. Is she hiding something?

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:38 am

sleepless
Decorated

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

re: Christine... is she hiding anything?
Answering dixiepooh

I don't think Christine is hiding anything because this is not a real life scenario, just a game where we have to rely on her to give us the clues and not the answers.
If this was a real life scenario, her actions and bad acting would have made her my number one suspect LMAO

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:47 am

avalonfox
Boot

Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 46

lights or daylight

hmm...ok...if you think about it...according to the time stamps (if they haven't been altered) Andrew could have actually worked 8-5 and turned the lights off and left....and then got kidnapped...sheesh so many possibilites as to what time he was kidnapped Shocked

*but his office was dark when sonia was in there at 8:15...hmm

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:49 am
Last edited by avalonfox on Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:54 am; edited 1 time in total

sleepless
Decorated

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Re: lights or daylight

avalonfox wrote:

True. Although they don't want the time stamp of the kidnapping but of the video clips that Christine has posted on savemyhusband.com
Figuring out when he was kidnapped was actually more "yesterday's" problem when we thought that the time of his kidnapping related to the time stamp they were going to ask us about today.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:54 am

avalonfox
Boot

Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 46

time of kidnapping

Was working on time because I was wondering if these 3 people came in his office before or after he was kidnapped....am really confused now...lololol

*his office being dark is almost like he wasn't there all day...heck, i don't know

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:58 am

tinkerbell1313
Boot

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 33

time stamp
missing papers

I don't thing the people in the video are the people that took Andrew, I believe it the person that is stopping the video tape.

If they could change the time stamp they would not need to cut the type, we would not be see the clock missing 34 sec.

Grant there at 4 AM, 34 sec. were cut out before he came in. We know for sure because of clock and water bottle moving.

Someone went back into the office after Grant left and cut the tape out again, water bottle gone, fruit and papers under it was missing, took Grant note plus now there two files on the desk instead of one. Sonia when in at 8:16 AM things had already been moved. Someone could have been hiding in the office when Grant was there and wanted to leave him on the tape, so the police would be looking at him.

So there tape missing twice from 4 AM to 8:16 AM.

Remember, a Exective officer filed a form 144 to sale stock, the would want this to clear before it gets out that the drug is no good, because there stock is going to drop fast after people find out. These forms have to be filed in advance and it not legal if you have insider info.

I think we are back to Jim Gaffney being the one that took Andrew. He in charge of uncontrolled delivery of drugs. (so he would have control of trucks or vans)

I live close to Seattle and there are a lot of underground parking and in some places down town you can walk for block under ground, they are like long hallways. I was in Washington DC last year and they have the same thing there, my grandson and I was taken into the Capital that way.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:00 am

Sharon
Boot

Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 31

Re: another PS
think of the people administering this game

dixiedooh wrote:

I should think it would be reasonable that on the verge of releasing this wonder drug to the world, and all the press and commotion it is/would cause, that the employees would be working some pretty on demand hours. Example......you can imagine the loss of sleep some of the deep focus crew are experiencing to run this game...with all the crazy things that can and have gone wrong. And I am sure that would be tame compared to what a drug company would be going through at such a breakthrough moment

I also noted that there was very little mention of Andrew in all the statements involving the release of Freevira, like they were downplaying his involvement.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:08 am

sleepless
Decorated

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Who did it and where is Andrew?

Well I posted my answer for today to Christina and it was accepted. I believe Grant is the suspect since the 34 seconds that were cut prior to his entry does not give someone enough time to run in, grab what they want and get out of Andrew's office without being spotted by Grant who is on his way to Andrew's office. So in my opinion the culprit appears to be Grant. ALthough when they find the cut footage we'll have the answer for sure... IF they can find it. If they can't find it perhaps there is another security video located just outside of Andrew's office that might capture who slipped in to Andrew's office during those 34 seconds. Rolling Eyes

Back to the next problem - where is Andrew?

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:09 am

TXVisitor
Guest

To Dixiedooh: Avatar
Off topic but posted to help Dixie

Hey Dixie ... I noticed you haven't gotten your Avatar corrected. I think if you leave the www.out of the URL it will work.

And, just to keep on topic, the time stamp may have nothing to do with the actual time of day, but might reflect the amount of time left on that particular video tape before it automatically goes to the next tape. If that's true, it would be counting down from 08:xx:xx to 04:xx:xx to 00:00:00. Shocked

Just ran out of tape and I don't know how to change it Confused

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:10 am

sleepless
Decorated

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Off topic

Woooohooooooo I got my avitar to work!

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:19 am

Sharon
Boot

Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 31

Re: Today's answer

sleepless wrote:

DO NOT LOOK IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW TODAY'S ANSWER:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):

04:34:26 to 04:34:58

Honestly, I think this is way too easy for getting near the end of the game.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:20 am

jtzapp
Kilroy

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 2

Re: Today's answer

Sharon wrote:

sleepless wrote:

DO NOT LOOK IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW TODAY'S ANSWER:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):

04:34:26 to 04:34:58

Honestly, I think this is way too easy for getting near the end of the game.

I'd really like to think so, too, but I dunno.

also, to add fuel to the spec:

Don't forget that Grant fires Sonia this morning. Was it because she helped us out/got too close, or is it to take away speculation from her? I'm going with the former.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:29 am
Last edited by jtzapp on Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:00 am; edited 1 time in total

Display posts from previous: Sort by:

Page 42 of 116 [1737 Posts]

Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, ..., 114, 115, 116 Next

Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: Save My Husband

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum