Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:55 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: Save My Husband
[TRAILHEAD] Part 2
View previous topicView next topic
Page 81 of 116 [1737 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, ..., 114, 115, 116  Next
Author Message
Luke482
Guest


Day 7 answer

Hello all,

Has anyone been able to access the security video that shows the DAY 7 date and time stamp for the DAY 7 answer? I am trying to catch up as I was gone for the weekend without computer access.. Help?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:01 am
 Back to top 
Rumrunner
Greenhorn

Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 4

Address.
Grant's other Companies...

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Zendorel has real estate holding located at 8 North Cherry St


PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:02 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tweetyfan898
Boot

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 12

Re: grants fingerprints

dixiedooh wrote:
Skyaline wrote:
Hi ya'll i just wanted to let ya'll know
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
that if you type in 0097219 on the fingerprint page grants name comes up i kept goin after 0097215 just to see what they had and found it maybe that where johnsons name was before and grant switched it



You are correct. I actually tried that back when the prints were first acceable and they nevr went past 015. Now they keep going and going...wih new names like Jeremy Hild, Mimi Jarsh etc.

The main characters who have been changes are grant, Sonia, carson brees, and frank C. The rest just seem to be add-ins.



I kept typing in numbers and it stopped at "24" today.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sleepless
Decorated


Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Re: Day 7 answer

Luke482 wrote:
Hello all,

Has anyone been able to access the security video that shows the DAY 7 date and time stamp for the DAY 7 answer? I am trying to catch up as I was gone for the weekend without computer access.. Help?

Go back a page... I just replied to that same question.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:07 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
IrishJrsyGirl
Guest


Re: Intrigue

rose33090 wrote:
Is it possible that the PMs are creating the illusion that Grant tampered w/employee fingerprints? Framing someone else? Also, I have listened to that named street (vid) dozens of times but cannot get the name where I feel confident. The voice that says "andrew's at..." seems dubbed in after the fact, especially when u pay attention to the "ok" right before it. Surely they will send a better clue than a garbled street name.


That is what I was thinking too...but then I was trying to remember when we saw the first set of fingerprints, were we "officially" supposed to have found them yet?? Or did we see the fingerprints too early and when the programmers changed the web address they also changed the fingerprints to match a "new" suspect and changed the ending? I don't know?? My head is going in circles.
If a player had not "looked ahead" in the game would they have seen the 1st set of fingerprints? If not, then we should just look at the new set as they are and forget about the first set.
If we officially came across the 1st set when we were supposed to, then we have to take in to account the change and the possibility that they tampered with.

About the name of the street the abducters say in video:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
can it be "Cherry Street"? Like the address of the real estate holding on Zendorel's site? If it is, then it would point back to Grant again because he is Board Member on Zenderol now.


PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:10 am
 Back to top 
tweetyfan898
Boot

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 12

Re: Murder Video
Observations

Caine1379 wrote:
#1 Listen to the voices before they mention the addresses the voice that states the addres is dubbed in. This could be a clue, or a piss-poor way of covering their asses. Maybe the ansewr has changed since the original leaked footage of the video. Anyone know?

#2 The voice does sound familliar, but not grants. Who else do we have on tape we could compare the sound to?

#3 After the shooting and before the camera is dropped, a female screams. Then we here either footsteps or more gun shots and an engine. Who was the female?



#1 When I heard one of the voices it sounded like Max to me.

From what I see it looks like three kidnappers. Two getting the money and one holding the camera. Or maybe that's a shadow? We only ever saw one on camera before. And if he shot them all why wouldn't he take the camera with him? Was the meeting someplace where someone would hear the gunshots?

Does anyone have any ideas on who and where? I thought it sounded like "Curry St" when I heard it.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
FLgata
Veteran

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 93

Things to consider
just some of my thoughts......

First of all, whoever is paying the ransom is doing so to protect their identity. It is definitely a male. They would have to have access to 2 million dollars...that's a lot of dough! We already know of one person who can put up that kind of cash.

Secondly, I also hear a female scream. Maybe Sonia was secretly filming the pay off. She may have been following the suspect because she is angry about losing her job and also trying to prove her innocence. I know that if I were involved, I wouldn't want to video tape any dealings...in fear that they would be discovered and come back to bite me in the butt, lol.

Thirdly, the money just lays on the ground to blow away in the wind. That makes no sense to me. Maybe after the shooter ran off, Sonia grabbed the money and that explains her disappearence...she's in Mexico partying with the locals, lol.

I do like the theory of someone fiddling with the original fingerprints though.

These are just some of my thoughts.....just speculations. Rolling Eyes

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:12 am
Last edited by FLgata on Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:19 am; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Newhere
Guest


thought

It is Grant. The 30 second video that we are missing was him changing the fingerprints.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:15 am
 Back to top 
sleepless
Decorated


Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Re: Intrigue

IrishJrsyGirl wrote:
rose33090 wrote:
Is it possible that the PMs are creating the illusion that Grant tampered w/employee fingerprints? Framing someone else? Also, I have listened to that named street (vid) dozens of times but cannot get the name where I feel confident. The voice that says "andrew's at..." seems dubbed in after the fact, especially when u pay attention to the "ok" right before it. Surely they will send a better clue than a garbled street name.


That is what I was thinking too...but then I was trying to remember when we saw the first set of fingerprints, were we "officially" supposed to have found them yet?? Or did we see the fingerprints too early and when the programmers changed the web address they also changed the fingerprints to match a "new" suspect and changed the ending? I don't know?? My head is going in circles.
If a player had not "looked ahead" in the game would they have seen the 1st set of fingerprints? If not, then we should just look at the new set as they are and forget about the first set.
If we officially came across the 1st set when we were supposed to, then we have to take in to account the change and the possibility that they tampered with.

About the name of the street the abducters say in video:

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
can it be "Cherry Street"? Like the address of the real estate holding on Zendorel's site? If it is, then it would point back to Grant again because he is Board Member on Zenderol now.

I thought the same thing but there's one problem with your theory - What IF while we all thought we were getting ahead and looking at stuff we weren't supposed to look at... what if that was ALL part of the game so that they can totally confuse us in the end?
I also say that the voice sounds like Grant cause I compared it to the first time Grant was on the news conference.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sleepless
Decorated


Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 267
Location: New York

Re: thought

Newhere wrote:
It is Grant. The 30 second video that we are missing was him changing the fingerprints.

I think you nailed it right on the head.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:19 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tweetyfan898
Boot

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 12

Re: Things to consider
just some of my thoughts......

FLgata wrote:
First of all, whoever is paying the ransom is doing so to protect their identity. It is definitely a male. They would have to have access to 2 million dollars...that's a lot of dough! We already know of one person who can put up that kind of cash.

Secondly, I also hear a female scream. Maybe Sonia was secretly filming the pay off. She may have been following the suspect because she is angry about losing her job and also trying to prove her innocence. I know that if I were involved, I wouldn't want to video tape any dealings...in fear that they would be discovered and come back to bite me in the butt, lol.

Thirdly, the money just lays on the ground to blow away in the wind. That makes no sense to me. Maybe after the shooter ran off, Sonia grabbed the money and that explains her disappearence...she's in Mexico partying with the locals, lol.

I do like the theory of someone fiddling with the original fingerprints though.

These are just some of my thoughts.....just speculations. Rolling Eyes


What if Sonia was part of it but secretly. Keep the focus on her while she claims innocence, but really not? She was filming the payoff in case they needed the leverage with the police. Or for future blackmail. And when he shot the other two guys she ran. I think we heard her running and her engine.

Now she's hiding afraid that she'll end up dead also.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:22 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
FLgata
Veteran

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 93

Re: thought

Newhere wrote:
It is Grant. The 30 second video that we are missing was him changing the fingerprints.


Has anyone actually seen this video yet?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:23 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
FLgata
Veteran

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 93

Re: thought
????

Newhere wrote:
It is Grant. The 30 second video that we are missing was him changing the fingerprints.


Has anyone actually seen this video yet?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:23 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Rodolana
Guest


Re: thought

sleepless wrote:
Newhere wrote:
It is Grant. The 30 second video that we are missing was him changing the fingerprints.

I think you nailed it right on the head.


So should we wait and see if the missing time code video shows up? I am going to have a hard time guessing Robert Johnson.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:25 am
 Back to top 
Frisbee
Greenhorn

Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 7

Re: thought
But?

sleepless wrote:
Newhere wrote:
It is Grant. The 30 second video that we are missing was him changing the fingerprints.

I think you nailed it right on the head.


I like it too, but if Mr Grant is so aware of covering himself, why would he need to use Andrew's computer? I mean, if you're going to remove your tracks anyway, why create the issue of having to remove security footage, when you could just do it from your own office?

To be honest, with the finger print changing, I totally forgot that he had wandered in there and did something. Yet another thing for me to go back and look at today.

Kinda wondering if we're going to receive some handy dandy messages from Max and the cop today. Today's puzzle seems quite out of character given the rest of the days' tasks. Seems to have gotten to be much more of a brain basher than the previous days and I have to believe we're going to see another video to clear this up.. Curry, Curvy, Kirby = Cherry? Seems like too much of a stretch for me.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:25 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 81 of 116 [1737 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, ..., 114, 115, 116  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: Save My Husband
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group