Author
Message
AngriBuddhist
Entrenched
Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Posts: 778 Location: Wa.
[UPDATE] Slide_Ref070107 http://206.16.223.65/90GH7j/Default.aspx
This was found by clicking on one of the circular nodes of this (?) monitor.
Discuss.
Description
Filesize
391.42KB
Viewed
289 Time(s)
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:27 pm
Last edited by AngriBuddhist on Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:47 am; edited 1 time in total
EdifyYo
Boot
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 22
Both of the graphics provided to us by Server 1 contain much Adobe Photoshop data, and Slide_Ref070107.jpg (a date in the filename?) contains the following information about the source image (I have removed the XML tags from the data for brevity):
Quote:
SEM of Streptococcus pyrogens bacteria,causes sore throat x2,000
S. Lowry/univ Ulster
BC3779-001
(c) S. Lowry/univ Ulster
http://www.gettyimages.com
A quick Google search finds: http://www.gettyimages.cn/index/showmid/photoid/489419.html
which is either a different photo by the same author OR a detail of the source photo used for the ARG.
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:33 pm
redct
Entrenched
Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 1233
We have a winner...! At first glance, I thought this looked a _lot_ like something from under a microscope. I emailed the image to my father, who has a masters degree in Biology - he worked in a ecology lab for 8 years.
He says that this is definitely a transmission electron micrograph. In other words, it's an image taken through an electron microscope. To give a sense of scale, a single human cell would take up about the whole image.
Hope that helps some.
EdifyYo: you beat me to it
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:47 pm
OwduaNM
Boot
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 45 Location: Aurora, IL
EdifyYo wrote:
Both of the graphics provided to us by Server 1 contain much Adobe Photoshop data, and Slide_Ref070107.jpg (a date in the filename?) contains the following information about the source image (I have removed the XML tags from the data for brevity):
Quote:
SEM of Streptococcus pyrogens bacteria,causes sore throat x2,000
S. Lowry/univ Ulster
BC3779-001
(c) S. Lowry/univ Ulster
http://www.gettyimages.com
A quick Google search finds: http://www.gettyimages.cn/index/showmid/photoid/489419.html
which is either a different photo by the same author OR a detail of the source photo used for the ARG.
It makes it even harder to suspend disbelief when someone points stuff like this out.
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:49 pm
DigitalDWR
Boot
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 58
This image was edited on a Mac.
com.apple.print.ticket.client
and was dated in the .txt. 7-0301-03
/shrug
......
lol if you open it up in word pad. this appears
dSEM of Streptococcus pyrogens bacteria, causes sore throat x2,
so this appears to be stock image of strep bacteria.
my throats tingling all ready
Adobe Photoshop Cs2 Macintosh. 2007:06:11 11:37:16s Lowry/Univ (c) Lowry/univ Ulster
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:17 am
skorpixx
Guest
Important date embedded in picture Haven't found this information on the forums yet... suprised that it has yet to be discussed..
Number on top right of picture: REF#070507
Possible date-- july 5th, 2 weeks from now
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:32 am
skorpixx
Guest
also.... there is a discrepancy between the slide ref number in the filename and in the picture
filename: Slide_Ref070107
picture: REF#070507
possibly two dates to consider, july 1st and 5th
--S
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:34 am
Siege88
Veteran
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 139
EdifyYo wrote:
Both of the graphics provided to us by Server 1 contain much Adobe Photoshop data, and Slide_Ref070107.jpg (a date in the filename?) contains the following information about the source image (I have removed the XML tags from the data for brevity):
Quote:
SEM of Streptococcus pyrogens bacteria,causes sore throat x2,000
S. Lowry/univ Ulster
BC3779-001
(c) S. Lowry/univ Ulster
http://www.gettyimages.com
A quick Google search finds: http://www.gettyimages.cn/index/showmid/photoid/489419.html
which is either a different photo by the same author OR a detail of the source photo used for the ARG.
Seems to me like Microsoft and/or Bungie decided not to shell out the cash to 42 this time around and thought they could do the ARG themselves, and this is the kind of mistakes you get.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:46 am
rpepper
Veteran
Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Posts: 86
Re: also....
skorpixx wrote:
there is a discrepancy between the slide ref number in the filename and in the picture
filename: Slide_Ref070107
picture: REF#070507
possibly two dates to consider, july 1st and 5th
--S
Well, on halo3.com Server #1 is the one that's been unlocked, but the Transmission Log and everything else references Server 5...so I think that the discrepancy lies there in this case. But the 7's are intriguing and I think we may be onto something with the dates.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:10 am
DigitalDWR
Boot
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 58
I allways liked their facination with prime numers
2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23
29 31 37 41 43 47 53 59 61 67
71 73 79 83 89 97 101 103 107 109
113 127 131 137 139 149 151 157 163 167
173 179 181 191 193 197 199 211 223 227
229 233 239 241 251 257 263 269 271 277
281 283 293 307 311 313 317 331 337 347
349 353 359 367 373 379 383 389 397 401
409 419 421 431 433 439 443 449 457 461
463 467 479 487 491 499 503 509 521 523
541 547 557 563 569 571 577 587 593 599
601 607 613 617 619 631 641 643 647 653
659 661 673 677 683 691 701 709 719 727
733 739 743 751 757 761 769 773 787 797
809 811 821 823 827 829 839 853 857 859
863 877 881 883 887 907 911 919 929 937
941 947 953 967 971 977 983 991 997
etc etc etc
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:14 am
Killswitch333
Boot
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Posts: 27 Location: Massachusetts
Re: We have a winner...!
redct wrote:
At first glance, I thought this looked a _lot_ like something from under a microscope. I emailed the image to my father, who has a masters degree in Biology - he worked in a ecology lab for 8 years.
He says that this is definitely a transmission electron micrograph. In other words, it's an image taken through an electron microscope. To give a sense of scale, a single human cell would take up about the whole image.
Hope that helps some.
EdifyYo: you beat me to it
Great find Red. Did he mention what he thinks it might be (real life wise). Or do you think it's a photoshop job. I'm gonna throw myself out here and say it's probably a sample of the flood but I was just wondering what you thought it might actually be.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:19 am
DigitalDWR
Boot
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 58
Re: We have a winner...!
Killswitch333 wrote:
redct wrote:
At first glance, I thought this looked a _lot_ like something from under a microscope. I emailed the image to my father, who has a masters degree in Biology - he worked in a ecology lab for 8 years.
He says that this is definitely a transmission electron micrograph. In other words, it's an image taken through an electron microscope. To give a sense of scale, a single human cell would take up about the whole image.
Hope that helps some.
EdifyYo: you beat me to it
Great find Red. Did he mention what he thinks it might be (real life wise). Or do you think it's a photoshop job. I'm gonna throw myself out here and say it's probably a sample of the flood but I was just wondering what you thought it might actually be.
If you take the image apart in word pad. it comes right out and says that this is a picture of the Streptococcus Bacteria ( associated with strep throat )
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:21 am
J2G
Guest
Ok, so if you open this image in Photoshop you can find some hidden paths.
Here is the paths box shoing the 3 and their names, and highlighting path 1
And here all 3 paths are filled in red.
The extend outside the boundry of the image... where they left in by a designer who addapted the image? Or do they mean something else?
J2G - stanesbySPLAT gmail.com
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:59 am
Killswitch333
Boot
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Posts: 27 Location: Massachusetts
Maybe it's a path that is set by the bacteria. Then again virus' don't really have a set path do they? It could mean that it is somehow spreading, but where?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:03 am
mithical
Boot
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 28 Location: Toronto, ON
That's pretty cool.
I see that the middle red blob (shaded guide area) looks like it lines up with the middle blue blob (from the actual photo) if you spin it 180 degrees and resize it a little. Perhaps if you manipulate all 3 guides in the same way they'll highlight something? Can someone do this? I'm without a photo editing program that's worth a damn.
EDIT: Okay well it turns out I can do some things with "Microsoft Picture It!" than I thought and I came up with this. I was hoping something would jump out at me but it doesn't look like it. Maybe someone with Photoshop should do it since my image keeps the original image underneath the shaded red...
EDIT2: You guys were fast.. and your image looks better so let's go with that.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:07 am
Last edited by mithical on Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:23 am; edited 2 times in total
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending