unforum

[rush]

 [SPEC] Bill & Jen

[redct]

Here's a recording of those silences, supposedly of "Bill" talking.

[CookTrain]

Re: [PUZZLE] Bill

[whitekeyes]

Not quite sure but isn't there a Bill Dialogue at the very beginning of the first call, before Man 1 says "...isn't necessary." If there isn't an actual pause in the recording, I still think we can assume that Bill has said something to start off the conversation at that point, and we should also attempt to fill something in there for Bill. It may be the most important part: It sets the subject for the rest of the conversation. What is the document that they're talking about?


CookTrain has some good ideas. I might change the first noted Bill Dialogue to "How much left is there to clean up?" Or something to that effect.

[Andorhal]

Well, the sites aren't actual websites, due to their differences, maybe these numbers are useful in some other way, its possible its something like a pass code, all of these numbers combined or in some other fashion.

If those Bill dialogs are your doing, good job... whoever did them; dialog 6 could be a bit sketchy, Man 1's dialog is too oped to pinpoint what he might have said.

Also, even though Bill may not be heard, that might not mean he's talking to them through the phone that were getting the recording from, but he might be blocked out for some reason, otherwise why would there be two participants? Weather or not you get what I'm saying you still have to wonder why the archive split it into two parts.

[rush]

It's possible that the conversation could have been 50 seconds longer before and we are coming in at the middle section on the first recording. Perhaps we'll get the first 1/3 tomorrow.

[CookTrain]

[whitekeyes]

[eccramer]

[Andorhal]

Also, even though Bill may not be heard, that might not mean he's talking to them through the phone that were getting the recording from, but he might be blocked out for some reason, otherwise why would there be two participants? Weather or not you get what I'm saying you still have to wonder why the archive split it into two parts.

[rush]

Re: [PUZZLE] Bill

[thebruce]

ooo Bill Gates nice spec, but doubtful

as for "isn't necessary", I'm still not convinced it's "isn't"... I could be wrong, but it would take quite some slurring to blend the two words together and still say "isn't". *shrug* But I haven't yet attempted to come up with a phrase that works with "...is necessary, and neither is..."

[rush]

[AMarine88]

actually... those fit rly well.

[eccramer]