Author
Message
coloneloneill
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 90
yea its definatly an overlay, you can see some blue in the star in the middle image
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:29 pm
coloneloneill
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 90
http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2007-12/release.shtml could this be related...?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:32 pm
Wizz
Kilroy
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 1
CTO Check This Out I was checking out the link
http://gallery.spitzer.caltech.edu/Imagegallery/image.php?image_name=ssc2005-09b
then decided to check out
Dr. Curtis Cooper listed at the bottom of the page.
I found
http://uanews.org/cgi-bin/WebObjects/UANews.woa/wa/SRStoryDetails?ArticleID=13872
that looks like the top of the Infestation.jpg
then I ran across this blurb about the Dr,
http://baratong.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3&Itemid=9
above that I followed the link on the top of that screen to
A halo of dark matter.
http://baratong.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=9
Looks interesting...
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:41 pm
coloneloneill
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 90
intrtesting that curtis coppers field is number theory...possible coding? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Curtis_Cooper
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:24 am
pondrthis
Veteran
Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 86
Oh sweet Jesus, I love number theory. Easily one of my favorite things in the whole dang world.
As for the 716Hz pulsar, omg! I didn't know something could have that much energy. That's absolutely ridiculous. Tapping into that for a nanosecond would probably power all of humanity for the rest of time.
If that thing collided with something, it would probably destroy the universe. That or it would cut through it like a chainsaw through bleu cheese.
Nice pic find.
_________________
CHARON
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:10 am
skybruin
Unfettered
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 373 Location: Missoula ,MT
interesting find wizz but keep in mind " follow the signs to victory" when looking for related sites at this point.
_________________Mongo not know, Mongo only pawn in game of life
XboxliveGamertag: SkyBruin
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:51 pm
Phyltre
Decorated
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 161
skybruin wrote:
interesting find wizz but keep in mind " follow the signs to victory" when looking for related sites at this point.
That's a painful spot. The last time I was told to "follow the signs to victory," it was because I had been given a size-medium ARG swag T-shirt and I had to lose weight to fit into it.
I really think any related sites will be more obvious though, when their time comes. So far it's mostly been hit-you-over-the-head stuff, either linked to, or IP address spelled out, stuff like that.
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:33 am
some dude
Guest
infrared planets show up bright red ...if planets show up reddish in infrared and stars are blue, then we need to reanalyze the StarImages
as we all know, StarImage1 and StarImage2 show the same area of space, in the first pic there is more light, in the second pic the glyph has rotated to show us that time has passed; but the focus is how many dots of light are gone
"Every sixteen hours another planet is taken. The numbers being lost are astronomical"
the red lights are planets viewed in infrared!
it all makes sense now!
...so where do we go from here?
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:46 pm
pondrthis
Veteran
Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 86
Red being shown in infrared means something is hot. A planet is not hot. Blue means cool. A sun is not cool. That logic is fallacious.
_________________
CHARON
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:23 pm
deadmanWalking
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Jul 2007 Posts: 4
Actually the stars are blue because they are hotter than the planets which are red.
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:36 pm
MHDante
Boot
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Posts: 28
Although the whitish tone means that it it hotter, the bluish color means that its emissions are less frequent... 25hrz?
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:31 pm
pondrthis
Veteran
Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 86
Just because the "upper" visuals are infrared does not mean the "lower" images are. No one has given me good reason to believe the images showing the two separate celestial bodies (presumed to be a star and planet) are infrared images.
_________________
CHARON
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:54 am
MHDante
Boot
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Posts: 28
Evidence
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
http://gallery.spitzer.caltech.edu/Imagegallery/image.php?image_name=ssc2005-09b
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:28 pm
RaveGamer
Veteran
Joined: 28 Jun 2007 Posts: 112 Location: Lancaster, CA
Flipped the picture from the Spitzer sight and put it next to the infestation picture.
Notice how in the side that is supposed to be visible light, in the Spitzer picture, it is gray. In Infestation, it stays red, albeit a darker shade.
"This artist's concept shows what a fiery hot star and its close-knit planetary companion might look close up if viewed in visible (left) and infrared light. In visible light, a star shines brilliantly, overwhelming the little light that is reflected by its planet. In infrared, a star is less blinding, and its planet perks up with a fiery glow."
Description
Filesize
392.64KB
Viewed
97 Time(s)
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:12 pm
CavalryKiller
Guest
Who says it's a planet?
Something extremely similar happens on the cellular level when a virus infects a cell. The images are of normal spectrum/MRI/Thermal scans...and the images in the top righthand corners mean something, but I have absolutely zero clue what.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:32 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending