Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:18 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[SPEC] Title and Film Structure Analysis
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
Author Message
davemitrani
Kilroy

Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 2

[SPEC] Title and Film Structure Analysis
Quick Analysis of Film's possible structure, Title

I apologize that my my first post on these forums is pure speculation, but I've been watching this forum since this all started, and figured that now was a good time to chime in.

Abrams has already denied that the title is "Monstrous", and, besides that, has said very little else in reference to the film's title. The simple fact that seems to have been missed is that there probably will be no title, and the film will simply be referred to as "1-18-08".

Other posts have taken this into account, but without taking into account the way this film will probably play out.

We know that the actors were not sent the real scripts before they signed on, and basically had to sign onto the movie blind. This leads me to believe that, for the sake of realism, the movie will probably sacrifice the actor's credits in favor of realism.

Presumably, the movie will have no title sequence, and will probably have no credits sequence, purely for the sake of realism. Not only is this unique for monster movies, it would break new ground for movies in general, which have always seemed to sacrifice any realism for things like credits, which completely break the mood of the movie.

From a business standpoint, this is a complete nightmare: how do you market a movie with no title, with actors no one has ever heard of? The answer seems to have been easy: exactly as JJ has been doing it. All things considered, we know very little about this movie, but are still intrigued. That is the best marketing there is.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:44 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
KLind
Entrenched


Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 928
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: [SPEC] Title and Film Structure Analysis
Quick Analysis of Film's possible structure, Title

davemitrani wrote:
I apologize that my my first post on these forums is pure speculation, but I've been watching this forum since this all started, and figured that now was a good time to chime in.

Abrams has already denied that the title is "Monstrous", and, besides that, has said very little else in reference to the film's title. The simple fact that seems to have been missed is that there probably will be no title, and the film will simply be referred to as "1-18-08".

Other posts have taken this into account, but without taking into account the way this film will probably play out.

We know that the actors were not sent the real scripts before they signed on, and basically had to sign onto the movie blind. This leads me to believe that, for the sake of realism, the movie will probably sacrifice the actor's credits in favor of realism.

Presumably, the movie will have no title sequence, and will probably have no credits sequence, purely for the sake of realism. Not only is this unique for monster movies, it would break new ground for movies in general, which have always seemed to sacrifice any realism for things like credits, which completely break the mood of the movie.

From a business standpoint, this is a complete nightmare: how do you market a movie with no title, with actors no one has ever heard of? The answer seems to have been easy: exactly as JJ has been doing it. All things considered, we know very little about this movie, but are still intrigued. That is the best marketing there is.


No one said it would all be on camcorders. I figure it would be cool to start off with some back history. I remember reading somewhere that it plays out from people watching the footage, as they found it on Coney Island. Dunno if I'm remembering right, but still it could show some backstory or something.

The making of Slusho?

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:56 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
IronJ146
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 634
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States

I've been thinking about this from the get-go, and it's a concept that I've kinda decided to keep in my back pocket until I see it happen. Mainly it's a hope that the film will work into a timeline that starts, well, here I guess...in alternate reality.

It would definitely be cool, and new, but like you said a marketing nightmare. A vast majority would/will be totally confused. Remember that the majority of the population aren't too bright, either, and that's how you make your money is getting them as well as the ones that do get it and appreciate it. Then again, and this is the beauty of the whole project, is that it puts art before profit. Hell, paramount'll presumably make their 30 million investment back opening weekend out of curiosity alone, anyway.

I'm always a proponent of pushing any art form forward. I'm still not sold that this is the case on this film, but it'll surely be awesome if it pans out this way.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:06 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Guest
Guest


Aren there SAG, Director's Guild or what have you rules regarding credits?

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:52 pm
 Back to top 
Guest
Guest


Anonymous wrote:
Aren there SAG, Director's Guild or what have you rules regarding credits?


Uh, that should read "are", not aren. Embarassed

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:53 pm
 Back to top 
Blargin
Guest


If what you said does happen (in the sense that there's no opening or closing credits) it won't be the first film to do that.

Apocalypse Now did that exact same thing, although I do remember the title being shown. All they did for credits was hand out flyers as patrons entered the theater, which listed all the credits.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:33 am
 Back to top 
suckaH
Unfettered

Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 672

As did Passion of the Christ. Granted, it was for a totally different reason, but the fact of the matter remains that they bypassed the previews.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:43 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
elvis cocho
Decorated


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 237
Location: San Diego,CA

REALLY?

because i saw that george lucas got fined for not putting credits at the beginning of star wars so if there arent credits i would prbly be a heavy fine
_________________
Waiting for Audioslave to get back together

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:48 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
i_c_weiner
Boot


Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 34

George Lucas did indeed get fined. The rest of the movies were non-guild. He originally wanted Spielberg to direct Empire, but that would be out of guild.

Basically, if it's a guild movie, there have to be credits to those who credit is due (cast, crew, etc.). If there isn't any credits, there will be a hefty fine. Lucas just didn't have pre-movie credits, but did have post-movie. Think if JJ decides to have no post-movie credits too. He'll likely get kicked out of everything.

Personally, I would love to have the film open with just "Paramount Pictures presents" "A Bad Robot Production" and then it goes right into the movie. No previews. No credits. Straight into the film. Then, at the end of the film, a little epilogue. And then, lights turn up in the theater. That would bring more realism to the film.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:15 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
golf
Boot


Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 57
Location: England

Yeah, but personally if I was a cameraman or worse the editor, sworn to secrecy over the film, I would want my name on it when it did come out. The film may stay secretive for a while, but personally I would want people to know it was me who had to keep my mouth shut and make the movie.
Infact, I would probably take Abrams to court myself.

I have one major flaw with the title being 1-18-08. In England, it would be stupid. we would have to change it to 18-01-08, mainly because thats how we read dates (I am tempted to argue this is the sensible way, and Americans do it backwards, but we should overlook that Razz)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:25 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
the_velociraptor
Decorated


Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 237
Location: A pen in Isla Sorna

The date isn't the title.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:56 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group