Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:06 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[Update][Meta] Jamie's Photobucket updated
View previous topicView next topic
Page 9 of 28 [410 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, ..., 26, 27, 28  Next
Author Message
Melampus
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 653

I leave for a day and miss all the fun! Crying or Very sad

Just wanted to add one observation: we're pretty sure that the PM's are monitoring this forum - if nothing else, it's easy feedback for their marketing efforts, and also to check on our progress in figuring things out, etc. Assuming that's true, then they HAD to know that there was a lot of interest in that photobucket account a while back - people talked at length about trying to hack it. So, they knew that we knew about the account and that at least some people were intent on 'getting in.' NOW, couple that with the lame password: paramount.

My point is: if they didn't want anyone to have access to that PB account, if getting in would screw up their carefully laid plans, then they would have made the password more difficult. Knowing people are trying to get access to the account and then making (or leaving) the password as "paramount" seems like an open door, doesn't it?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

Kraker wrote:
EDIT: It's odd, the wayback machine has record of almost all the accounts under s195.photobucket.com/albums/z(#)/(name) except for Jamie's.

It's as if there was not record of it existing (dum dum dum!)

More like they set it up with the 'don't cache this' so they could better protect their copyright (maybe), or the timeline from being screwed up (more likely).

Edit: Speaking of caching, clicking Google's cached link for the page brings you to a login prompt, and the album set as private. The cache was made on Sept. 30th. Very interesting.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:43 pm
Last edited by Euchre on Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 4310
Location: Des Moines, IA

Here's one, I'll see if I have the others.
448395401_36f50debb7.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   68.72KB
 Viewed   60 Time(s)

448395401_36f50debb7.jpg


PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:47 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraker
Unfettered

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 749

Euchre wrote:
Kraker wrote:
EDIT: It's odd, the wayback machine has record of almost all the accounts under s195.photobucket.com/albums/z(#)/(name) except for Jamie's.

It's as if there was not record of it existing (dum dum dum!)

More like they set it up with the 'don't cache this' so they could better protect their copyright (maybe), or the timeline from being screwed up (more likely).

Edit: Speaking of caching, clicking Google's cached link for the page brings you to a login prompt, and the album set as private. The cache was made on Sept. 30th. Very interesting.


Well no... If there was no cache then google wouldn't bring it up. What I like about the internet archive is that it gives multiple versions of the same site (meaning not just one cache) and you can usually bypass any required password.

It's quite odd though, slusho seems to be documented by the internet archive, but websites such as tagruato.jp and jamieandteddy.com are not.

Wierd...

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 4310
Location: Des Moines, IA

And the rest...
1177986130-748-1.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   45.44KB
 Viewed   55 Time(s)

1177986130-748-1.jpg

jamboxinthevolvowindshield-III.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   112.28KB
 Viewed   54 Time(s)

jamboxinthevolvowindshield-III.jpg

jamboxinthevolvowindshield-III-1.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   56.58KB
 Viewed   52 Time(s)

jamboxinthevolvowindshield-III-1.jpg


PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:15 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SlushoLover
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 97

Kraker wrote:
It's quite odd though, slusho seems to be documented by the internet archive, but websites such as tagruato.jp and jamieandteddy.com are not.


Not really. Two ways to not be listed on the IA WBM:

1. Place a robot instruction file within your pages instructing crawlers what to log and what not

2. Ban the IA crawlers IP addresses from accessing your server or site through a firewall ruleset.

Any server admin worth their salt can tell you that it is extremely easy to manipulate just who sees what when they come to your site...

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:44 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraker
Unfettered

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 749

SlushoLover wrote:
Kraker wrote:
It's quite odd though, slusho seems to be documented by the internet archive, but websites such as tagruato.jp and jamieandteddy.com are not.


Not really. Two ways to not be listed on the IA WBM:

1. Place a robot instruction file within your pages instructing crawlers what to log and what not

2. Ban the IA crawlers IP addresses from accessing your server or site through a firewall ruleset.

Any server admin worth their salt can tell you that it is extremely easy to manipulate just who sees what when they come to your site...


I'm not saying it can't be done, I'm saying why do it for some and not for others.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:47 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

I think Kraker hit on the right idea when mentioning that the WBM has multiple versions. Google's cache doesn't do that by design, so any reverse reference there is ephemeral, and thus not much to worry about blocking. The WBM would be worth blocking, so a more site specific block would make more sense. Many large companies with time sensitive or copyright oriented materials request that IA does not cache it's content on the WBM. That's another thing, you don't have to block it from your end - you can just ask the IA to not cache your content from their end.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraker
Unfettered

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 749

Well, if anyone is interested, here is the only documented version of a website I could find on the WBM:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070711120505/http://www.slusho.jp/

It's what slusho was like july 11th

I'm assuming that since it was the first, the creators quickly came to their senses and realized that the wayback machine could give an unfair advantage to the players, so they decided to get their future sites blocked.

That is my theory.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
human
Boot

Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 31

brettoniasam wrote:
Yeah, I think anyone who thinks the game is "broken" because of this has a short memory.

Remember, folks -- they were COUNTING on someone hacking the password of Jamielovesteddy.com. The ARG was *dependent* on that hack.


The difference was, though, that 'jamielovesteddy.com's password was clearly IG, as has been pointed out. 'paramount' as a password is not quite so clearly in-game. I mean, paramount is the distributor of the film and funder of the PR campaign for this movie we are all here to learn about. Why would a character in the movie have a password that happens to be the name of the company that's probably underwriting the game PM's?

No. "paramount" was the password given by a somewhat lazy PM to an account. No doubt there are multiple PMs so they wanted something easy to remember -- someone got lazy, got accidentally de-curtained, and panicked.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:03 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jojo
Decorated


Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 194

Sorry I missed all this...

I have two questions-

1) Is it likely that a PM would be monitoring the site on a Saturday evening? Are these guys independent contractors who sit at home and program when they feel like it and have, like, little alarms that go off when someone messes with a site, or is it like a 9-5 office job? It just seems a little odd because most of the updates (and definitely all the MySpace work) has been done on weekdays during normal working hours, so I'm wondering if the fact that this didn't happen during that time period makes it more likely to be a Unfictioneer or someone else messing with us. In other words, Sat night seems like prime time for a bored teen to hack into a site & have some fun, not for a company of probably 20-30somethings to be sitting at work.

Quote:
He does NOT post the password on these forums.


2) If Dr. A didn't post the password, where did "paramount" come from?? Was or wasn't that the password to the account? Because if it was *really* something else, then that pretty much defeats any argument that this was supposed to be IG.
Quote:



*edited to add quote so my question made more sense.


PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraker
Unfettered

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 749

jojo wrote:
Sorry I missed all this...

I have two questions-

1) Is it likely that a PM would be monitoring the site on a Saturday evening? Are these guys independent contractors who sit at home and program when they feel like it and have, like, little alarms that go off when someone messes with a site, or is it like a 9-5 office job? It just seems a little odd because most of the updates (and definitely all the MySpace work) has been done on weekdays during normal working hours, so I'm wondering if the fact that this didn't happen during that time period makes it more likely to be a Unfictioneer or someone else messing with us. In other words, Sat night seems like prime time for a bored teen to hack into a site & have some fun, not for a company of probably 20-30somethings to be sitting at work.

Quote:
He does NOT post the password on these forums.


2) If Dr. A didn't post the password, where did "paramount" come from?? Was or wasn't that the password to the account? Because if it was *really* something else, then that pretty much defeats any argument that this was supposed to be IG.
Quote:



*edited to add quote so my question made more sense.


I'm not positive about this, because it seems if it was an independant company in charge of the ARG, they wouldn't have much to do a lot of the time since hints only come out every once in a while. It's probably a subdivision of marketing.

Unfortunately since apparently they were on the computer the second dr. Awkward hacked it, they changed it as quickly as possible.

Since Dr. Awkward is the only testimony to this event we can conclude two things:

1. He is damn lucky and is telling the truth about the password
2. He is in fact a PM

I sincerely doubt the second option since that would violate all rules of an ARG and would despicable of the PM to help us out (let us do our own thing :-p).

I also don't see why if Awkward was a PM and was meant to find that photobucket and expose it it would be useless. I mean, wouldn't it be easier just to have another reference to it? I mean, why give access to it now when it didn't seem important? If it was going to be important, there are many ways to hint us we need to get in, such as a myspace comment where Lascano says "It's in my photobucket, I havn't gotten around to posting it"

It would be idiotic for the second option, and so, unfortunately we are stuck in a real colbyrook situation where only one person was in fact able to witness what really happened.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jojo
Decorated


Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 194

Sorry, one more quick question - what exactly did the first message say (the one that was like "don't hack into this") - does anyone have a screengrab or remember it? I didn't see this info when I went back through the threads.

Asking because I'd like to put it here: here

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Dr. Awkward
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 374
Location: Marunouchi - Tokyo, Japan

jojo wrote:
Sorry, one more quick question - what exactly did the first message say (the one that was like "don't hack into this") - does anyone have a screengrab or remember it? I didn't see this info when I went back through the threads.

Asking because I'd like to put it here: here


It's on page 1 of this thread...I posted the [img] link originally and it's still accessible here it is...

_________________
.don I ,nem eniN ?terpretni nem enin oD
Launch Randomousity Chat ...
Do nine men interpret? Nine men, I nod.


PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:49 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Melampus
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 653

A thread entitled "sarahnettleute Password Thread" was started on Aug. 3, by da_pope. There are 44 posts - according to the posts in that thread:

1. there was a sarahnettleute myspace account that got deleted just about as soon as people found it (which was within hours, I think, of finding the Slusho 7 myspace pages).

2. the photobucket account was NOT initially password protected - it became password protected only after some unfiction people had been there and looked at the photos (that photo that is now Doc Awk's icon/avatar wasn't there, though).

My point is: we can rule out any possibility of Dr. Awkward "just messing with us" on this one, as in... The Colbyrook Incident (cue dramatic music). If Doc Awk had reported just finding the photobucket account and guessing the password, then yeah, it'd be very suspicious, but that account has been around for a long time.

I like the Doc Awk = PM idea - that's exciting. Doc Awk did find the Vernon MacDooble articles; but, then again, Doc Awk was also one of the people who initially applauded colbyrook for the 'find' that was the b.s. Rob message. IMO, Dr. Awkward has been a good contributor to this forum... but, not that good. Wink I think the chances Doc Awk is a PM are slim to none.

I think Doc Awk stumbled on the password just as reported. The fact that the PM's responded so quickly on a Saturday, though - that is weird (as you pointed out a few posts back, jojo). But, I don't think any of that has anything to do with Dr. Awkward. If Dr. Awkward is a PM, then...

"Do you think my methods are unsound, Willard?"
"I don't see any method at all, sir."
- Sheen & Brando, Apocalypse Now Wink

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 9 of 28 [410 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, ..., 26, 27, 28  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group