Author
Message
DougBThree
Decorated
Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 249 Location: Florida
Interview with TJ Miller aka Hud The slow news week continues around here. I did find this interview with TJ Miller, who plays Hud, that was posted today. He gives some humorous answers to a few questions about 1-18-08, but don't expect any great revelations.
http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2007/10/29/starpulse_exclusive_carpooler_s_tj_mille
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:45 pm
Kraker
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 749
I'll quote what's relevant in the interview for reference.
==========
Will audiences get their fair share of T.J. Miller in this?
Audiences are going to get less than any share of T.J. Miller. They're going to get a fraction of what is considered a fair share of me. You will probably see my face for possibly 3 minutes and twenty-five seconds. It's possibly the weirdest situation I've been in. But you'll hear me, and I'll be present in the movie for the entire duration of the film.
Is that information that you are able to reveal?
Yeah, I think so. You can say that it's safe to say that because I'm behind the camera and you're going to hear a lot more of me than you're going to see. And you can get that from the preview. In the preview you don't see me at all, you just hear me. It's going to be crazy. It's going to be everything the JJ Abrams fan wants out of a movie and probably more.
Is it hard to keep a secret this big?
I'm not a guy who runs out and is like, "Look what happened to me!" But I think it's strange because in every other film, they want you to talk about it as much as you can. They just want people to be aware of it, and in this one I just got a call because I spoke to a PA who is on the trailer but isn't on the movie and I talked to her about the film in some bar and it got back to them. They said that this was a huge problem, "You can't go out drinking and talk about the movie." I didn't know she wasn't on it. They're furious about how secretive it is. Nobody can really confirm what is going on in the film. You just can't. It's even almost hard for me to confirm anything. I didn't get the script until after I signed onto the project, and even when I did get the script I wasn't told what was going on. It's a very strange project to work on.
What would happen if somehow it slipped out?
It's JJ Abrams. I'd never be able to work with him again or I would have to be in Mission Impossible: 4. Both of which are disconcerting to me.
In case you were wondering, here's TJ's OGM: You know what to do, which is press 1 to skip this greeting, or if you haven't heard these instructions before, in order to contact me you leave me an alphanumeric message in which the key is sent to alphanumerickeycodes@ tjmillerdoesnothaveawebsite.com . I will check my email, use the key to decipher the message, and then I will send you a text message using the code that you set up and emailed to me. That text message will contain a 1-800 number, which you can call in order to contact someone who will let me know who it is who left a message, and I will contact you using the number you've given to my assistant at the 1-800 number that you got from the text message from the coded key that you set up on the original voicemail on this number. Thanks. Have a great day!
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:50 pm
Chump Force 1
Decorated
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 286 Location: Next in line after 'Client 9'
Kraker wrote:
Is that information that you are able to reveal?
Yeah, I think so. You can say that it's safe to say that because I'm behind the camera and you're going to hear a lot more of me than you're going to see. And you can get that from the preview. In the preview you don't see me at all, you just hear me. It's going to be crazy. It's going to be everything the JJ Abrams fan wants out of a movie and probably more.
Is it hard to keep a secret this big?
I'm not a guy who runs out and is like, "Look what happened to me!" But I think it's strange because in every other film, they want you to talk about it as much as you can. They just want people to be aware of it, and in this one I just got a call because I spoke to a PA who is on the trailer but isn't on the movie and I talked to her about the film in some bar and it got back to them. They said that this was a huge problem, "You can't go out drinking and talk about the movie." I didn't know she wasn't on it. They're furious about how secretive it is. Nobody can really confirm what is going on in the film. You just can't. It's even almost hard for me to confirm anything. I didn't get the script until after I signed onto the project, and even when I did get the script I wasn't told what was going on. It's a very strange project to work on.
I've often thought of how hard this must be for the cast not being able to talk about their roles or discuss any aspect of the movie. The contract they signed must be ironclad about not revealing any details...I don't think anything has slipped out since shooting wrapped in early August.
I wonder who the PA (production assistant?) was in the trailer? Probably just some extra...got to be scary for the actors knowing there are spies around that will report back to JJ!
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:03 pm
jojo
Decorated
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 194
I make a motion that we accept this interview + the other evidence already discussed as once-and-for-all proof that Hud is the cameraman in the trailer. In other words, we have an answer to at least one of the many trailer questions.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:19 pm
A_champion
Veteran
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 129
jojo wrote:
I make a motion that we accept this interview + the other evidence already discussed as once-and-for-all proof that Hud is the cameraman in the trailer. In other words, we have an answer to at least one of the many trailer questions.
I will second that. i think he has made it pretty obvious.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:29 pm
pegassissy
Unfettered
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 552
Also, his statements lead me to believe that the entire movie will be shot from the camera.
BLAIR-WITCH SYTLE BABY!!! WOOOOOO!!
Ahem, sorry, yeah, so uh 1st person it is.
_________________And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:35 pm
Evil
Veteran
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 83 Location: Behind picture #6
Actually, that interview does confirm that the lion's share of this movie will be from Hud's perspective behind a video camera. It also lends credence to the popular notion that Hud's name was created as a parody of the common First-Person Shooter term, HUD (Heads Up Display) . That doesn't even begin to touch on the Blair Witch worries discussed in greater detail here .
_________________"Perception is virtual, not reality" -- Evil, 2007
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:41 pm
Evil
Veteran
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 83 Location: Behind picture #6
Poop. You guys post too fast - sorry for re-iterating the sentiment.
_________________"Perception is virtual, not reality" -- Evil, 2007
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:42 pm
Johnnyutah16
Veteran
Joined: 04 Oct 2007 Posts: 105 Location: Los Angeles, US
The fact that he is in very little of the film and v-over And he is the Camera man, this confirms that the film is goin to be Hand-Held Camcorder-esque Heads up display (HUD) filmaking in which he is mostly voice over and behind camera? Can this confirm the rumor that someone finds the tape after the fact?...im fairly certain this debunks, alot of the speculation on how much of a role Tagruarto Conglomerate will have in the actual film, probably just the pregame to build up a causation for those who care. as voice over only, i wonder if he even got a SAG rate? HAHA
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:46 pm
Johnnyutah16
Veteran
Joined: 04 Oct 2007 Posts: 105 Location: Los Angeles, US
evil and Pegasissy You both type faster than I, either that or you have a talkntype
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:48 pm
bewarethanatos
Boot
Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 57
Kraker wrote:
Is it hard to keep a secret this big?
What would happen if somehow it slipped out?
These two questions, I think, are poorly worded because of the fact that only a few questions ago, they were talking about him being in his underwear.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:46 pm
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3342
For being such a 'not much' thing to find, this sure helps us understand a LOT more about the movie.
Great job Doug!
Alas, we know who shoots the footage in the trailer.
We also know that Hud is effectively the 'narrator'. I wouldn't be surprised if he was slightly misled about how much of the total footage is his work, especially in light of the scene we saw shot in Central Park. Perhaps that was in fact the last 'scene' of the movie, and Hud's camera is with Rob and Beth, because Hud is dead already.
He says he's present for the entire duration of the film, but considering the apparent camera angle in that scene, he'd either be lying on the ground (odd) or laying there dead with the camera pointed at Rob and Beth.
The latter does paint a relatively funny image in my mind, but uh...
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:43 pm
brettoniasam
Unfettered
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 340
Yeah, it effectively confirms 2 things I had always believed, and shoots down 1 thing I had always believed:
1) Hud is, and always will be, the cameraman.
2) It will be shot entirely BW style, on jerky handcam.
But what I got wrong:
3) It's apparently *not* going to be shot from multiple POVs and/or cameras.
This movie now seems to be entirely shot in Hud-cam.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:06 am
brettoniasam
Unfettered
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 340
Which also reminds me of an interesting point about a set-spy report on IESB many months ago that detailed a kind of military triage center set up out in Downey, CA for the movie....featured hovering choppers and combat medics wheeling somebody on a gurney.
That seems to put things in a new light, and the Downey footage might wind up being the last scene in the movie: my guess is that Hud is wounded and being airlifted out of New York in that scene, and the army is then going to use his film footage to piece everything together.
So, semi-spoiler: I'd guess that Hud is the sole survivor.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:11 am
e2c
Unfettered
Joined: 30 Sep 2007 Posts: 338 Location: What is this for? Bob's got cancer - We'll miss you bob!
it would make sense with all that stuff Miller said...the whole film in a handheld camera look, however I remember one of those set videos that were leaked on the net a few months back. it shows rob and a blond chick being trapped under a bridge with lots of shit falling apart and onto them. there was no handheld camera there.... could you really film everything from one point of view up til then and then go back to a more conventional camera mode?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:01 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending