Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
  

The time now is Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:12 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)		 View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: Reference / Press / Questions
[META][INFO] 12 Cloverfield Pics in Lizzy Caplan Interview
View previous topicView next topic
Page 3 of 7 [101 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Author Message
DougBThree
Decorated


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 249
Location: Florida

 		Picture 3 reminds me of the scene from "Alias" where Slusho was originally introduced. Although, in rewatching that scene http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epVFwDln8Nw, it looks like the Slusho machine was actually in a liquor store.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
deadtotheworld564
Decorated

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 200

 		But they are not behind a sheet of plastic. Doesn't Lizzy play Marlena??

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:10 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Atyxs
Boot


Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 40

 		Observation
From looking at this pic...thanks to Evil http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u179/Evil_Pix/1-18-08/explodersmall.gif

You can see the guy in the bottom right. He looks like the guy in the top right of this picture. http://www.blackbookmag.com/galleries/features/galleries/clover/pf_slide_clover5.jpg

Which seems to show the aftermath for Marlena. She's held down to blow up, mutate, die ???

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
deadtotheworld564
Decorated

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 200

 		Also, it seems that if i am right, we will get footage of what happnes before the party. Because Lily and Rob are in the convience store Lily looks happy and her hair isn't messed up and herp arrty dress is perfect.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
mhovis
Veteran

Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 113
Location: Canyon Country, CA
Quote:
The other pictures DEFINITELY weren't there earlier.

When I read the article this morning, I noticed the pictures in the article were numbered 1, 2, and 6.

I tried 3, 4, and 5, but they were not there this morning.


Thank God! That would have been really sad

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:20 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DougBThree
Decorated


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 249
Location: Florida
deadtotheworld564 wrote:
Also, it seems that if i am right, we will get footage of what happnes before the party. Because Lily and Rob are in the convience store Lily looks happy and her hair isn't messed up and herp arrty dress is perfect.


Yes, plus there were reports of some filming done at Coney Island, with the gang hanging out and having fun, not fleeing in terror, so it's reasonable to assume the film in the camera doesn't start with the party.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
deadtotheworld564
Decorated

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 200

 		whole movie handheld camera theory: Maybe if it is Blair witch like meaning all handheld camera, then the footage would be the whole "tape" from the before footage, the party, then the attack.

Some Handheld other professional camera theory: Hud isn't in the picture of Lily and Rob in the convience store.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lambo_Diablo_Svtt
Entrenched


Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 914

Sorry about having rob & co.'s faces pointed out after everyone has noticed already, but I do think that is the exact same scene... notice the points in the suits.

Also... why is half of her shirt SOAKED in blood?

*EDIT* One other thing... after looking at this picture and reviewing the trailer again... it DOES sound like shes the one screaming, and theres a nasty crunching-splattering noise at the end...

quite disturbing. I really hope this movie is rated R and not dumbed down to PG-13...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:58 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
weller
Boot

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 24
Location: Washington, DC
stugots wrote:
i'm trying to think of what would make someones nose/eyes bleed like that (the eyes might be eyeliner though).......chemical warfare maybe? hemothorax? plain trauma? dry climate?


Ebola, but I doubt it's Ebola.

"The interior bleeding is caused by a chemical reaction between the virus and the platelets which creates a chemical that will cut cell sized holes into the capillary walls. After several days the person will die literally of "a million cuts." Occasionally, Internal and external hemorrhage from orifices, such as the nose and mouth may also occur, as well as from incompletely healed injuries such as needle-puncture sites."
- wikipedia

The patient is then beset by spontaneous bleeding from body orifices and any breaks in the skin, such as injection sites, and within the gastrointestinal tract, skin, and internal organs.
- Encyclopedia Brittanica

Doesn't say eyes but I'm pretty sure it's possible

However, even if it's not Ebola, it may be similar to the "plague" or "infection" theories that keep surfacing (and possibly related to Jamie's liver problem?)

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Shadowfury
Decorated


Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 152
Location: New York

 		Ok, so lets say that scene IS of the two guys in the hazmat suits holding her down....I highly doubt she actually "blows up" but to me it makes more sense that the second hazmat guy somehow stepped behind her to get a grip on the girl. Hence the reason we see a huge rotund object suddenly appear from her shadow.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Status
Veteran


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 123
Location: Valley of the Sun

 		Okay I may be retarded BUT, I've been looking for the thread that showed a picture from the warbloid site of someone in a blue hazmat suit. Does anyone know where that is posted? If I remember correctly it's the exact same type of suit.

Please don't flame me for this post, but it is really odd that a fake site who pissed off a lot of users actually got the suit right. Any help on this would be appreciated.
_________________
I have no clue what I'm doing...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:10 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Johnnyutah16
Veteran

Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 105
Location: Los Angeles, US

 		Marlene?
I agree, her health is compromised, compared to shots where you see others are okay in the backgrnd and she is clearly fuquedup, be it Biological, Chemical, or Viral, she seems to be toast

I concur, as i have argued the whole time Lil's Guns are gonna save the world

per Michael Scott on the office last night,

question: who are the twins?

Michael: They be on me-ladies chest.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:15 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
pegassissy
Unfettered

Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 552

 		Status, its "retarted" here. Smile

Ok, just a thought here, and as usual, i could be off base. But these new photos, they are too perfect.

I realize the new trailer was shot 100% in handheld camera, but i find it very odd that the new screenshots are so clear.

What do you guys make of it. Sorry i forgot your name, and where you posted, but a graphic designer said (one of) the photo(s) had been altered through photoshop. This leads me to believe that
1) the movie may not be shot in 100% handheld. the odds fell from 8-3 to 2-1 in my mind.
2) The shots may not be included in the movie, and may have been given to us to throw us off. JJ's been sooooo secretive so far, and now he lets out these revealing shots, c'mon.

Way off base? probaly. Sorry if this chops up a conversation.
_________________
And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
weller
Boot

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 24
Location: Washington, DC
pegassissy wrote:
Status, its "retarted" here. Smile

Ok, just a thought here, and as usual, i could be off base. But these new photos, they are too perfect.

I realize the new trailer was shot 100% in handheld camera, but i find it very odd that the new screenshots are so clear.

What do you guys make of it. Sorry i forgot your name, and where you posted, but a graphic designer said (one of) the photo(s) had been altered through photoshop. This leads me to believe that
1) the movie may not be shot in 100% handheld. the odds fell from 8-3 to 2-1 in my mind.
2) The shots may not be included in the movie, and may have been given to us to throw us off. JJ's been sooooo secretive so far, and now he lets out these revealing shots, c'mon.

Way off base? probaly. Sorry if this chops up a conversation.


I think these photos are shot by a photographer and not screenshots. I can't tell if that's what you're thinking or asking, but I'm assuming you're referring to the photographs included in the interview.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DougBThree
Decorated


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 249
Location: Florida

 		Re: Marlene?
Johnnyutah16 wrote:
I agree, her health is compromised, compared to shots where you see others are okay in the backgrnd and she is clearly fuquedup, be it Biological, Chemical, or Viral, she seems to be toast


In pictures 7 and 9, we see her in agony, inside a very damaged apartment. I'm guessing this is where she suffered the injuries. Perhaps they are just from falling debris. However, to me, it looks like this is a high-rise apartment, and I'm speculating that the monster took a swipe at the building, creating the damage we see. I suspect she experienced some kind of physical contact with the monster at that point, resulting in her "infection".

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 7 [101 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: Reference / Press / Questions
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group