Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:06 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[INFO] HD Monster Footage
View previous topicView next topic
Page 5 of 7 [93 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Author Message
J0shuaKane
Veteran


Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 113

i see 2 small legs and the underside of one small part of a huge shell moving forward. the "shell" is moving too fast/smooth for those to be its only 2 legs and be that big.

it still looks upright(kind of), but there is definitly a helluva lot more to the monster than what we see.

and i dont think the monster would drag his head near the ground in any case.

i think it will be a crab/squid/whale, but right now to me it looks like a giant crab.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:19 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Blacraven
Kl00


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 42
Location: On Earth, But Not Of Earth.

Headman wrote:
I do not see a turtle at all. I went frame by frame and cut out the clearly visible parts of the monster and pasted them together. I cannot make out the face, hands, feet, back, or if it has a tail. I hope the rest of it looks cool and hope it has a very scary looking face and mouth with lots of teeth.



This is exactly what i saw and explained it in another thread
Cloverfield monster put together 2.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   167.74KB
 Viewed   85 Time(s)

Cloverfield monster put together 2.jpg


PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:27 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
IronJ146
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 634
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Wow, very nice loop. Too bad I missed this...
So, I'm gonna say this, and I expect to catch hell for it, but I'm being incredibly honest here...
You know what I think it looks like?

A dude in a suit...Not saying it's good or bad. Just my opinion on the first thing I thought of when I saw it...
Flaming Nutter

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:17 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
detranova
Veteran


Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Location: North Billerica, MA/Yidu, Hubei, China

IronJ146 wrote:
Wow, very nice loop. Too bad I missed this...
So, I'm gonna say this, and I expect to catch hell for it, but I'm being incredibly honest here...
You know what I think it looks like?

A dude in a suit...Not saying it's good or bad. Just my opinion on the first thing I thought of when I saw it...
Flaming Nutter


Ah...I wish. After seeing Godzilla: Final Wars and Gamera the Brave, I have to say that I prefer suits to CGI now. It just moves more realistically. Then again, it's kind of sad that realism for a monster is moving like an overweight laid-off pot-bellied chain-smoker in a rubber suit. Oh well. You win some and you lose some.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:34 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Lasher
Boot


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 39

Only one thrid seen

I have to agree with most cases that this is only one third of the monsters mass or profile. Judging from the movement in this scene you can clearly see that while the two legs are being used for locomotion the body or upper mass does not lirch at all.

Anyone whos ever riden a horse here would know what I mean. When a creature moves animal, human, whatever, there is a side to side motion. The penguin walk would be an exagerated example of what I am refering to. Like a waddle.

In this short sequence you can see that there is no waddle, lirch or side to side movement from the upper part. What does that mean??? though I'm not entirely certain my best educated guess would have to be that the creature is a Hexoped (6 legs) and what we are actually seeing in this is the middle part or middle 2 legs. It's my understanding that with a hexoped (insects) the middle two legs would actually move independently from the front and back. well.. not independently but they could move without causing the creature to lirch or sway its body while these legs move. As these legs do not actually suppor the weight of the creature.

If I had the time id draw up a rendition to illustrate what I mean exactly. Perhaps someone could do a rough sketch to help me here.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:20 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
AnthonyWC70788
Boot


Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Louisiana, USA

 Oh Come On It Is Obvious (Just my Opinion, lol)

Sorry, you all, I know this is my first post here and I must say I have been around for a while just staying back and looking and reading and watching. This site is great. Sorry I will now be around more and will post soon on what I think the plotl ine is and what we are actually seeing.......

So on to the topic at hand, people, and I am not trying to offend to many here, but you are looking to hard at what you are seeing, it is obvious, clearly, that this creature is in lack of better terms, is all to familiar with Godzilla from the emmerich film. WHat you see in the video here, that slows the movement down and backs it up again and goes forward is a dinasaur like creature, with longer arms, and is walking not away from the camera just kind of to the side of the camera. Obviously it would be if they are shooting at it. It has two legs, that bend like our knees, and I clearly see an arm, now as far as the head, which is not in this seen cause it is behind the building when they shoot the camera in that direction, but the long thing leading up to the top of the screenand behind the building is merley his neck, which is also very muscular from what it shows, kind of like a T Rex with longer arms, and again kind of like Godzilla just standing more straighter up, not saying this is godzilla cause it is not, "this is our own american monster" not a remake or reinterpetation, just something new, and you can not tell what is on his back, but you do see somethign there, I am thinking probably some kind of plates or something, maybe even wings, but I would doubt it since we do see its trails in the water from the SOL. Not going to have a water monster that flies, but I could be wrong. Again, I say this, this is a T-Rex looking creature, and it is so obvious it is ridiculous...... Sorry if I offended anyone here, my apologies, just my opinion....... Anthony

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:14 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
J0shuaKane
Veteran


Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 113

that "neck" is just part of its shell.

this thing is not godzilla like at all, you are just looking at it wrong.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Caerwiden
Unfettered


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 651

J0shuaKane wrote:
that "neck" is just part of its shell.

this thing is not godzilla like at all, you are just looking at it wrong.


Considering that we see the barest glimpse of the thing I think it might be best to not tell people they're 'looking at it wrong'.

We might ALL be looking it wrong.

I don't see a shell, at all, I see a lump.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:42 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
J0shuaKane
Veteran


Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 113

Caerwiden wrote:
J0shuaKane wrote:
that "neck" is just part of its shell.

this thing is not godzilla like at all, you are just looking at it wrong.


Considering that we see the barest glimpse of the thing I think it might be best to not tell people they're 'looking at it wrong'.

We might ALL be looking it wrong.

I don't see a shell, at all, I see a lump.
good for you, ref Rolling Eyes

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:46 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Caerwiden
Unfettered


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 651

J0shuaKane wrote:
Caerwiden wrote:
J0shuaKane wrote:
that "neck" is just part of its shell.

this thing is not godzilla like at all, you are just looking at it wrong.


Considering that we see the barest glimpse of the thing I think it might be best to not tell people they're 'looking at it wrong'.

We might ALL be looking it wrong.

I don't see a shell, at all, I see a lump.
good for you, ref Rolling Eyes


Hey, no need for the attitude. I'm just pointing out that no matter what anybody says, we don't actually know what the hell the thing is.

Telling someone that they're looking at it wrong when all you have to base judgment on are a few frames of blurry, smoky footage is pretty insulting.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
cloverfreaky
Veteran

Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 109

The Magic Eye puzzle continues!

While I can see the head/shell/turtle/dino thing that people are currently outlining now, that image appears more like a "look what that cloud looks like" kind of thing. It doesn't seem fluid or static enough, especially given that we're assuming to see the whole head. It looks way out of scale to me, too. (Even monsters have to make sense...his head would be bigger than his leg!)

I'm still with the "upright creature, but too little to tell anything for sure" crew. I also seriously doubt that the movie crew would give us such a clear view of the monster that could be found by simply still-framing on the trailer. There's no way they are going to reveal that thing in full before opening weekend.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Sasori
Greenhorn

Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 9

I think it looks more like the crap/isopod leg to be honest. When it strafes to the right behind the building, try to look at the leg as it moves right. It seems to bend about a few floors up and shoots up and left. (This is looking at it from our perspective). So it would resemble an N shape.

I would agree that this thing looks enormous. In fact, I would say its more like 1/5th and not 1/3rd. In the back of the N leg, you can see that there is a little joint there like a crab's.

That's what I see.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:59 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Headman
Entrenched


Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 839
Location: Michigan

Here is an update to the cut and past of the frame by frame stills of the monster I did. I cut and pasted pieces of the monster and blened them together. I have updated the picture to show the arm folded back next to the head. I thought originally it was part of the head and the arm but now I see it is only the arm we see and not the head. Maybe it is protecting it's head from the military firing at it or it could be the creators covering it so we cannot see what it looks like.
monster arm.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   47.36KB
 Viewed   68 Time(s)

monster arm.jpg

Cloverfield monster put together 3.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   157.9KB
 Viewed   58 Time(s)

Cloverfield monster put together 3.jpg


PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:33 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SlushoLover
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 97

Ok, I made my video originally as a flash animation, but it got so big that if 10 people watched it I would have to mortgage my house to pay for the bandwidth I was using. So then I exported it to a video file, (see it here) but it too is huge, plus the aspect ratio is off and quite frankly I don't have time to correct it. It outlines the monster as several others have seen it and I think they are correct. Thanks to Sigrada who pushed me in what I think is the right direction with his persistent posting of this theory that made me re-think my theory.

Here are some stills from the video that might show everyone what I think I see in the trailer:

monster head monster ribs
claw front leg

And here is an animation that comes from the video that outlines the monster as it moves within the 11 or so frames it appears in the trailer. I tried to stay true to the shape as it was shown in each frame, so the shape changes quite a bit from frame to frame. I think this is probably due to (a) auto-focus of the video camera struggling to keep the frame in focus, (b) smoke and debris from the damage the thing is doing and (c) the darkness of the scene.

monster moving ~2 Meg

Edit - sorry those pics and gif are the hugest yet, they'll make dial-up users explode - MikeyJ

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:19 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
e2c
Unfettered


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 338
Location: What is this for? Bob's got cancer - We'll miss you bob!

what you think is its head is actually its leg. trust me. just believe me for a moment and watch the gif again. u can see the knee there and how it ties in with the rest of the motion.
_________________
you know more about it than I do...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 7 [93 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group