Author
Message
doublecross
Unfettered
[UPDATE] silverladder.com week 5: 09/12/07 - 15/12/07 The three of diamonds I have found the following, and aim to keep it updated over the week - please correct/add if you have found anything else/more.
week 1 thread
week 2 thread
week 3 thread
week 4 thread
Description The three of diamonds
Filesize 3.51KB
Viewed 798 Time(s)
_________________xx
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:15 pm
Last edited by doublecross on Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:52 am; edited 5 times in total
onceuponanever
Boot
Since 3D (Saul) has just been revealed, it seems likely that people haven't had time to fully explore the new pages. There is one important thing that has come up, however.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Saul has written us a letter stating that the Aces have decided to fold two of the deuces. Folding is, essentially, permanently silencing them. We will be the ones to decided who is folded and who will stay. All of the deuces have been unsilenced this week.
The letter and instructions may be found by going through all the pages and filling the pool of tears, or you may follow this link.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:37 pm
mgelles
Decorated
Has anyone stooped to consider the fact that the whole premise that this is wrong on every level. The very favt that the aces have dominion over what is essentially the lives of these characters should be openly challenged. Everyone has the right to live, speak and befriend whom they choose. If a rule is unjust it ought not to be followed. The fact that the aces seek to pass the burden of choosing who remains onto us is merely an extension of their unjust control. I refuse to be led into doing something i know is wrong. The deuces have given us a message about the power of love, about the fact that it is not necessary to have a critic to appreciate art and the sheer beauty of chaos yet the accept the aces authority without question, which makes little sense. I refuse to vote as I do not assume the right to place value on the life of one friend over another. This does not mean i intend to leave all four to their fate. I intend to offer Jonah and the others an alternative to sacrifice. fighting for their continued existence for each is uniquely beautiful and existence is his or her right to be defended.
_________________played Lost Experience, Occular effect, Geist, LGlabs, silverladder
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:20 pm
IronJ146
Unfettered
DoubleCross, I just want to point out that you're doing an awesome job documenting what goes down on Sunday's, and doing it quickly. Please keep doing what you're doing.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:19 am
doublecross
Unfettered
Thanks, IronJ!
_________________xx
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:28 am
analogwatch
Unfettered
doublecross wrote:
Incidentally, I was surprised that this week was 3D, I thought it would be 3C. Seems the suits are not in a fixed order.
doublecross wrote:
I agree that we should not accept this 'folding' proposal and should seek to keep all the cards flat!
And if we reject this "folding" proposal, the Two of Clubs will sacrifice himself. By not voting, we vote for HIM to fold himself, and we'll likely lose the other three as a result. Saul fought hard for us to be able to keep two of them, and we should be grateful for what little we got.
_________________i'm a lurker. srsly.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:07 pm
Coffeebean
Unfettered
3d When clicking on the words "never coming back"
http://www.silverladder.com/diamonds/3d/words/index.htm
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:35 am
doublecross
Unfettered
Well spotted, coffebean - thank you!
_________________xx
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:52 am
miss-temptation
Boot
analogwatch wrote:
And if we reject this "folding" proposal, the Two of Clubs will sacrifice himself. By not voting, we vote for HIM to fold himself, and we'll likely lose the other three as a result. Saul fought hard for us to be able to keep two of them, and we should be grateful for what little we got.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:17 am
Samuel Owl Robison
Greenhorn
To vote or not to vote? Obedience, mutiny or something else all together?
mgelles wrote:
Has anyone stooped to consider the fact that the whole premise that this is wrong on every level. The very favt that the aces have dominion over what is essentially the lives of these characters should be openly challenged.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:40 pm
Last edited by Samuel Owl Robison on Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Wandering Star
Veteran
Was there not the tyrannical Queen of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:26 pm
Samuel Owl Robison
Greenhorn
Well put, Mr. Star. So we have a story with antagonists. I agree, that makes for a good story. And we are also a part of the story. So now we each have a decision to make. How to respond to the antagonism? Within the reality of the game, is it permissible to question the authority of the Aces? And is it even productive to do so?
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:02 am
natalieee
Guest
i found a video. http://www.silverladder.com/diamonds/3d/words/foolsontheeleventh.htm
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:10 am
doublecross
Unfettered
Thanks - I had that, probably poorly described as *of red stained ->plughole video
_________________xx
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:28 am
incursive
Boot
Results of the folding (as posted by all of the deuces)
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:43 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending
FAQ
Search
Calendar