unforum

suckaH · Unfettered Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 672

Maybe they were trying to tell us that it obviously didn't take place in january by the 63 degree temperature. Instead, we forced the temperature into january and tried to come up with theories for why this would be.

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:17 am

TallulahBelle · Entrenched Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 779 Location: Sweden

If the attack happened in say august/september, dont you think it woulda been mentioned in-game?

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:48 am

suckaH · Unfettered Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 672

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:49 am

m0r1arty · Unfettered Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 337

Jamie still had to open her gift in December right?

And with other elements of this ARE timing is important (opening dates, deaths, TIDO hack etc.)

So time is relative here, perhaps it does take place in 18th Janurary 2008.

-m0r

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:15 am

Anteros

I don't understand why people are so upset about the time stamp thing.

From the beginning, it has been stated by many of us here that there's no way the movie was taking place on 01-18-08. Someone here even gave very reasonable explanations for the issue (can't remember who,)which was brushed under by the louder ones here.

This issue has always been over analyzed and, I can't quite believe it, still is.

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:13 am

_________________
.
Beware of Geeks bearing Gifs.

Euchre · uF Game Warden Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3342

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:26 am

_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
�Euchre 2007

imnutty · Boot Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 69

If people are worried about the time stamps and stuff like that then i really dont understand the Picture of the 2 girl's faces on the website. Im preatty sure they did not say "OmG MoNster attack lets take Myspace pics " and turned the camera around and made scared faces. And i dont think Some 1 would get that closed to there faces and take a picture. I think the pictures are just showin parts in the movie to give us some clues.

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:52 am

djspankypants

First of all this is a silly thread. Secondly i dont think there will be a set date for the attack. I think it is supposed to be in the past at some point, seeing as how they found the tapes and we are watching them now. As in 1-18-08 is teh day the government released teh tapes to teh public. So its like the Blair Witch Project in that regard. Or maybe the opening will simply say. On Oct. 26 2007 A monster attacked new york city. What you are about to watch are the tapes form that evening. These tapes are teh only known video footage of it to exist.

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:57 am

suckaH · Unfettered Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 672

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:16 pm

InAFieldofClover · Unfettered Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 375

I think Reeves was misquoted. He seems to spout off more about how the movie was never going to be called '1-18-08'.

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:17 pm

StayPuftMarshmallowMan · Decorated Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 199

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:21 pm

InAFieldofClover · Unfettered Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 375

**Posted:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:26 pm