Author
Message
W-Three
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 Posts: 348 Location: 50° S 100° W
[Trout] AKAparalax has gone down (Do not post) This possibly may not deserve a thread. Either because its already been said, or because its not important.
But Akaparralax has gone done, gone, poof, finito. So I think this settles thats its OOG.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:56 pm
Last edited by W-Three on Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:19 pm; edited 3 times in total
blee02
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 87
i have no idea what your talking about, lol
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:58 pm
Ivo
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 380 Location: Illinois, USA
Re: [New/Trout/Unsure] AKAparalax
W-Three wrote:
This possibly may not deserve a thread. Either because its already been said, or because its not important.
But Akaparralax has gone done, gone, poof, finito. So I think this settles thats its OOG.
Me knows of what ye speak. I always assumed OOG, if it wasn't obvious then it should be now.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:58 pm
Kraker
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 749
Be prepared.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:58 pm
W-Three
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 Posts: 348 Location: 50° S 100° W
In my defense I did search for it.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:01 pm
Kraker
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 749
Against your defence, you spelled it wrong, so probably didn't get the right results.
akaparallax is the correct way.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:03 pm
Ivo
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 380 Location: Illinois, USA
W-Three wrote:
In my defense I did search for it.
I think it may have just been a spelling issue: akaparallax.
There is some talk of it in this thread: http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=22260&start=15
So, I guess.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:04 pm
W-Three
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 Posts: 348 Location: 50° S 100° W
Hmmm...are you sure?
Latest stuff on the thread still talks about it as if its still up.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:06 pm
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3342
Yep, it's a trout.
W-Three you can refine the tag or I can, cool either way.
Nice fishing.
Please remember that a trout is to be fondly roasted, not mercilessly blended... as much fun as it might be to some to watch a trout in a blender. Almost as much fun as exploding chicks.
Heh.
Exploding chicks.
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:07 pm
W-Three
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 Posts: 348 Location: 50° S 100° W
Wouldnt it only be a trout if it was mentioned before? Which as far as I can tell...it wasnt.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:08 pm
Ivo
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 380 Location: Illinois, USA
W-Three wrote:
Wouldnt it only be a trout if it was mentioned before? Which as far as I can tell...it wasnt.
I think the point is that there was already a thread discussing AKAparallax so there isn't any need for another one. No offense or anything.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:10 pm
Ryuzaki
Veteran
Joined: 19 Nov 2007 Posts: 104
W-Three...since your evidence has not been brought up in that thread everyone links to your trout...the only thing I can suggest is reposting it there. From what I read that thread was divided on the authenticity of akaparallax and your information would be more relevant there than in a new thread. At least you'll know it has been said by you in that "trout" thread and accept a personal victory that you were the only one to notice? Then just let this thread die.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:15 pm
W-Three
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 Posts: 348 Location: 50° S 100° W
Quote:
I think the point is that there was already a thread discussing AKAparallax so there isn't any need for another one. Smile No offense or anything.
Fair enough.
Quote:
W-Three...since your evidence has not been brought up in that thread everyone links to your trout...the only thing I can suggest is reposting it there. From what I read that thread was divided on the authenticity of akaparallax and your information would be more relevant there than in a new thread. At least you'll know it has been said by you in that "trout" thread and accept a personal victory that you were the only one to notice? Then just let this thread die.
I thought about that. Unfortionalty, in hind sight, it wasnt really worth bringing up. Its been said once (even though it was a trout), its not important enough to be brought up again.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:18 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending