Author
Message
JordLimb
Veteran
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 78 Location: Georgia
Can the spoiler at least not be put into the sub-heading?
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:03 am
The Enchanted One
Decorated
Joined: 09 Dec 2007 Posts: 180 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Fixed.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:04 am
knightmareSlusho
Veteran
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Hollywood, CA
Well....i take it that it is definitely not an alien?
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:06 am
Enantiomorphic
Boot
Joined: 22 Sep 2007 Posts: 48
the spoiler tag should be enough.
but we should start using
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
spoiler comments like this
at least until the 18th
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:06 am
blaaaaaah
Unfettered
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 313
Awesome. I'm almost entirely satisfied until the 18th. Just about everything I suspected is coming true.. except for the origin...
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:08 am
Colt
Unfettered
Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 400 Location: Piney Flats
Enantiomorphic wrote:
the spoiler tag should be enough.
but we should start using
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
spoiler comments like this
at least until the 18th
at least till the 5th of febuary actually, where theres a lot of brits on here, they get it on the 1st
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:08 am
Ryuzaki
Veteran
Joined: 19 Nov 2007 Posts: 104
Quote:
i think we should try to enforce a new spoiler rule as we get closer to the release date
dont post the link(its more tempting0
tell people you have the link and ask them to PM you if they want to see it
good idea... maybe?
Like its been said earlier...this was inevitable. Trust me...there is gonna be people who don't give crap and will spam the boards with blatant spoilers (posts and threads) regardless of whatever we say. That's the risk we take in getting info here. But at least we finally have some new concrete answers which is also why we play the game.
The mistake with the thread title was bound to happen eventually... regardless, this was an excellent find, no denying that. Thanks for this article Enchanted One.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:10 am
Last edited by Ryuzaki on Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:11 am; edited 1 time in total
Heizer
Boot
Joined: 07 Jan 2008 Posts: 48
Safe to say marlena really does explode. =D
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:11 am
DougBThree
Decorated
Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 249 Location: Florida
Well, I read it. I kinda wished I hadn't, but I certainly wouldn't say it spoiled the whole movie for me. Far from it.
Oddly enough, some of the details mentioned here are consistent with this whacked out review most of us probably read last month on Aint It Cool News:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35100
Who'da thunk that nutjob was right?
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:11 am
VioletColleen
Boot
Joined: 21 Dec 2007 Posts: 21
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Well this pretty much confirms the review done a month or so back on AITC news. Especially with the monster scratching it's back thing on a building.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:14 am
TwelfthMonkey
Veteran
Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 108
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
If it needs to "scratch" it's back, then we are not talking about an insect or crab like creature, are we? Massive ugly whale or reptile seems more likely now
Ryuzaki is right, I WANT TO KNOW! HOW IT ALL WENT DOWN!... that's why I'm following this ARG. I want ANSWERS! I don't care being spoiled, but other ppl do and we got to respect that.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:15 am
My_Name_Is_Dan
Veteran
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 97
How does this article at Slashfilm confirm Marlena explodes?
All it confirms is she got a bite from MiniMGP
(aka DCM (Dog Crab Monster)
It doesnt confirm she explodes??
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:17 am
Enantiomorphic
Boot
Joined: 22 Sep 2007 Posts: 48
Colt wrote:
Enantiomorphic wrote:
the spoiler tag should be enough.
but we should start using
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
spoiler comments like this
at least until the 18th
at least till the 5th of febuary actually, where theres a lot of brits on here, they get it on the 1st
that's true. i just hope that this board doesn't spin into chaos. especially when that article says:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
And where is he from? "We don't say – deliberately," notes Goddard. "Our movie doesn't have the scientist in the white lab coat who shows up and explains things like that. We don't have that scene."
i have a bad feeling that people are going to turn to the ARE for answers and ending up flooding us with no regard for others
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:19 am
rocksmars
Unfettered
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 305
DougBThree wrote:
Well, I read it. I kinda wished I hadn't, but I certainly wouldn't say it spoiled the whole movie for me. Far from it.
Oddly enough, some of the details mentioned here are consistent with this whacked out review most of us probably read last month on Aint It Cool News:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35100
Who'da thunk that nutjob was right?
The review was bound to be fairly correct. It's clear they're using AICN for marketing and it doesn't pay to give them bad info. The guy who wrote it is a pro comedian and would hardly do this for fun or risk looking stupid with bad info. It's was practically a paid advertisement.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:20 am
Jenive
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 127 Location: New York
wow, took a break for a day and this comes out.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
I'm happy that now I know I'm not insane and there is something chasing them in the tunnels. And that the "fluttering" noises were crab like legs and the screech probably came from these creatures. Awesome. But, for some reason the idea of these things on the monsters back makes my skin crawl... O_O
Thanks The Enchanted One.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:20 am
Last edited by Jenive on Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:22 am; edited 3 times in total
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending