Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:54 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[QUESTION]The explosion
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 6 [86 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
Tsakara
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 74

1.
I think the explosion was some ship exploding at the docks, the explosion propelled a lot of large debris that didn't just burn up or fragment like wood or rock would, those were large metal chunks that it sent tumbling through the air, my guess is that a ships fuel tank ruptures, this causes and explosion which then triggers other secondary explosions from other fuel sources (cars, boats, etc) nearby creating the huge mounting fireball without the mushroom cloud.

2. The monster is huge only when its on its hind legs, which it doesn't appear to do. It looks like it normally walks on all fours, and stands up on its hind legs for short spurts, the other thing is that when it was at the subway and at central park it looks like when its on its stomach its only about 2 stories tall. since its aquatic it wouldn't be a huge stretch to think that it moves through the water on its stomach.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:01 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

I know somebody just didn't say "tentacles". Even after seeing the movie, and the monster, somebody STILL says "tentacles".


There's only ONE monster.

"What is that thing?"

"Whatever IT is, IT'S winning."

NOT:
"Whatever THEY are, THEY'RE winning.

It was the monster's tail that destroyed the bridge. It was so painfully obvious to even the most casual observer. There's no freakin tentacles. There's only one monster.

There's no explanation needed for the large explosion at the beginning. There's lots of explosive things in a city. Natural gas pipelines, trains full of fuel, a fuel depot, anything could have caused that. Don't look too deeply into it.
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:00 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Roe
Boot

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 58

^^

It's pretty clear where the explosion generally came from. Ellis Island is down that way, Statue of Liberty, and a bunch of apparentments, stores and offices along the island. Plus, a lot of water.

I think you will find the types of explosive things you described aren't typically in lower Manhattan. Simply because of the danger involved and the population there. Somewhere in the city yes, but not downtown lower Manhattan. Any pipelines would also be way underground in that area.

It's all way up in the air anyway. First of all, the directors and producers probably don't always get so worried about being specific where something can come from, like this explosion. I could easily believe they intended it to be the tanker, but other explanations make more sense in my world. Second, they made this movie so that about 95% of the information has to be guessed about--which is why I am going to get my monies worth. Very Happy

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

We've been discussing and researching what could have cause that explosion for months, before any of you new people got here. I'd suggest everyone go research the last 6 months of work done by the people on this board before they post their facts. There's plenty of things in that area of Manhatten that could cause that explosion. You ever seen a tanker of fuel oil explode? Or a natural gas pipeline? How about a propane truck?
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:26 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
elijunk
Kilroy

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 2

Has anyone else related this explosion to the explosion of the Tagruato Oil Drill explosion? In the video of the explosion you clearly can hear the sounds of the monster, when the large drill sinks it explodes out of the water with large, heavy shrapnel objects that fly quite a distance. I find this very similar to the way to first explosion in the movie causes large chunks of debree to fly at long distances and very high in the air. I find it hard to believe that such explosions could cause as large of debree to fly so far and high, which leads me to believe that the monster does some sort of hitting or thrusting, or even perhaps swallows and spits debree out of its mouth. You can make this connection with the way he "throws" the statue of liberty head.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Rudyred
Boot


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 15
Location: Lake Superior

elijunk wrote:
Has anyone else related this explosion to the explosion of the Tagruato Oil Drill explosion? In the video of the explosion you clearly can hear the sounds of the monster, when the large drill sinks it explodes out of the water with large, heavy shrapnel objects that fly quite a distance. I find this very similar to the way to first explosion in the movie causes large chunks of debree to fly at long distances and very high in the air. I find it hard to believe that such explosions could cause as large of debree to fly so far and high, which leads me to believe that the monster does some sort of hitting or thrusting, or even perhaps swallows and spits debree out of its mouth. You can make this connection with the way he "throws" the statue of liberty head.


I was wondering about that too. In the oil drill video especially, the way the chunks of debris flew out of the water was incredibly unnatural. If there was an explosion underwater that had enough force to throw giant chunks of metal that high, then there would have been a huge upsurge of water as well, since water is generally lighter than metal.

That doesn't really explain the initial source of the Manhattan explosion, though. Confused Just the big pieces of debris that come flying out of it.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:58 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
penguin-1203
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 88

starshiptrooper wrote:
I know somebody just didn't say "tentacles". Even after seeing the movie, and the monster, somebody STILL says "tentacles".


There's only ONE monster.

"What is that thing?"

"Whatever IT is, IT'S winning."

NOT:
"Whatever THEY are, THEY'RE winning.

It was the monster's tail that destroyed the bridge. It was so painfully obvious to even the most casual observer. There's no freakin tentacles. There's only one monster.

There's no explanation needed for the large explosion at the beginning. There's lots of explosive things in a city. Natural gas pipelines, trains full of fuel, a fuel depot, anything could have caused that. Don't look too deeply into it.


but the thing is, the military could assume (or the guy whos talking) that there is because they might all look the same. plus the monster itself could act really fast, making them think its only one monster.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ScubaSteve1717
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 89

stellacotton wrote:
I didn't know a tentacle destroying the bridge was a fact. I thought it was the tail of the monster. Tentacles are usually used in combinations of two or more for gripping. What was it doing with the other tentacles while using just one to destroy the bridge? I didnt even see tentacles on the monster. Rolling Eyes


Sorry I just find it funny and have to point out the fact that you find it believable that it was a giant tail from a massive behemoth, but don't believe it was a tentacle because they are usually used in combination and it is not a possibility that it was just overlooked by the makers of the film. It is just a movie, mistakes will be made.

I'm not argueing either point, I'm just saying...

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Stumper67
Veteran

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 97

Re: Thoughts

sowht wrote:
This was a great question Angstfild, made me join here, hello all.


Question: "what in Manhattan could cause such a fireball?"

Answer: Nothing, nothing in Manhattan could cause a fireball like that.

So where does this leave us, it actually helps answer all the biggest questions.

The monster is not from this planet. We know that it is almost completely unaffected from all our combined conventional arms.... 120mm depleted uranium & HE shells from our M1 tanks, javelin missiles, heavy machine guns... even 500-5000lbs bombs from a B2 bomber only pissed-off the monster. The creature is a scientific impossibility unless it is replacing, healing it's micro structure from nanosecond to nanosecond. Nothing like this exists on this planet or from human science.

So, let try this...

Explosion scenario one: Some type for star ship crashes. This intergalactic zoo ship was just starting to leave after finding a few choice specimens from NY central park (a few of those CP freaks would really be a big hit as "curiosities" back on the alien home world, maybe they abducted Technoviking (curiosity in itself on any planet) and he got out & grabbed the pilot Confused ...), has some kind of problem and BOOM, crashes... strange fireball throwing chunks of "who knows what" all over the city, as one of the very nastiest creatures gets loose, one that can heal from nanosecond to nanosecond, replacing it's micro structure constantly....

But this leaves us with the tanker capsizing in the harbor, so we would have to accept the news story as just some strange coincident or maybe a part of the starship breaking off as it was trying to correct the problem, striking the tanker before the spacecraft finally fails altogether and crashes in the city...

or....

We have to accept there is TWO monsters because there was no sign of tentacles on the land monster.

The Bridge was destroyed by a huge tentacle (or tentacle looking appendage, good point out Stellacotton, thanx), fact. So the logical line of thought would be the Tanker was capsized by the same "something" we never got to fully see, that was in the Ocean. The tanker can be viewed from the bridge just before the bridge is destroyed by one hit by the Ocean creature

Which takes us to....

Explosion scenario two: Some kind of energy gate opens, massive, split second release of energy causing the huge strange fireball explosion, because it opens in our atmosphere, as our little friend comes through and the gate slams shut. Why? some type of attack or test to see how we deal with something so powerful. Maybe even a freak accident by a race of noble creatures but they were testing with the only creature capable of surviving the journey through the energy gate/portal....maybe one they even help genetically modify to make the vicious gate jump....

The first gate opens under the tanker, causing much less destruction/explosion but still easily capsized the ship (no easy feat in it self), as the first true creature with tentacles is released and the gate slams shut.

Maybe the first gate was tried in a water environment, opening and shutting minutes before the land gate opened. Two type of gates, one opening under water, the second on land, both with the same nasty creature types that can survive the violent process....

Anyway, I hoped some enjoyed a different line of thought on the "whys" and "hows".... I guess any theory fits in, that's what makes the movie so watchable.

Thanks for reading.


Except for the fact that WE'VE NEVER ENCOUNTERED ANYTHING LIKE THIS EVER!!!!!!!

Humans do not know the possibilities of life on this planet. We can't possibly know. This planet has had life on it for billions and billions of years. Just because something doesn't fit the conventions that WE OURSELVES IMPOSE ON BIOLOGY doesn't mean it's from another planet.

It's incredibly arrogant to suggest that just because we've never encountered something that it can't exist on this planet.

You do realize that we discover new species that defy biological conventions literally everyday, right?



Also, it was the thing's ARM (or possibly his tail) that tore up the bridge, not a friggen' tentacle.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:08 pm
Last edited by Stumper67 on Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Roe
Boot

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 58

Starship:

I can appreciate members of the board has dicussed this stuff, but I am sure you don't have all the answers either. I am suprised you would suggest this, to be honest.

The whole point about questioning the explosion, it's size and source, is there is no definitive answer and it's questionable. It makes the theory the military caused the explosion plausible.

That explosion was in the city itself, and the flames reached as high as 40, 50 or 60 or more stories, and obviously across several blocks in every direction.

In the clip and in the movie you also see large flaming debris falling near the roof Hud, Rob and all of the party were observing from. A long, long way way. One lands on a nerby building, giving a good perspective on how large these falling pieces were. This was a HUGE explosion.

It wasn't a propane or fuel truck. Those things would never be allowed in any residential area if they had that much potential for distruction. Gas line? I know the big commerical ones that transport stuff from state to state might have this power, especially if that type of volume of gas was allowed to build up for a while. I could see this. I am not so sure about smaller gas lines--who knows..

It's not definitive and questionable, which is again, my point.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfdsXVcKFpk&feature=related

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:11 pm
Last edited by Roe on Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
d0nu7
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 86
Location: New Mexico Tech

No, the military would know how many of them there are. Bombers flying over city, jets, helicopters. They would report that "hey, I see two of them." And this would be reflected in the words of the military. In a situation all hectic like that, if you know something you would have to think yourself out of saying that there are more than one. The explosion does seem familiar to the drill situation. Both are very unnatural and implausible. An explosion big enough to throw stuff like it did would throw more than like 8-10 pieces. There would be hundreds if not thousands of pieces flying everywhere.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:12 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
sowht
Greenhorn

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 4

Stumper67 wrote:
Except for the fact that WE'VE NEVER ENCOUNTERED ANYTHING LIKE THIS EVER!!!!!!!

Humans do not know the possibilities of life on this planet. We can't possibly know. This planet has had life on it for billions and billions of years. Just because something doesn't fit the conventions that WE OURSELVES IMPOSE ON BIOLOGY doesn't mean it's from another planet.

It's incredibly arrogant to suggest that just because we've never encountered something that it can't exist on this planet.

You do realize that we discover new species that defy biological conventions literally everyday, right?



Also, it was the thing's ARM (or possibly his tail) that tore up the bridge, not a friggen' tentacle.


Jeeesh, Lighten up, Francis.... Stumper67, take a valium or something, I didn't mean to step on your obsession...
It's called imagination, and enjoyable exchange of thoughts on the MOVIE, did you forget it isn't real? Now go back to sharpening your knives and relax a little...
As I said in my post, "I hoped some enjoyed a different line of thought on the "whys" and "hows".... I guess any theory fits in, that's what makes the movie so watchable. Thanks for reading"

Sorry your so caught up in a fake movie, and you needed to get all CAPP LOCKED about it Laughing
(it's not real pal, sorry I to be the one, but someone had to tell you)

To all the tight wound people trying to tell everyone else to research the facts before we post (ie starshiptrooper), There are no facts, it's a frigging monster movie that leaves most of the facts to the audience... have some imagination and try to welcome New people to your forum, or are you the resident person who makes everyone else feel they can't talk because their view is different from yours? Laughing Not me, could careless how nuts you get Cool

Anyway, it great to see everyone else's theory on the explosion and movie, because they are all right answers and enjoyable to read.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Stumper67
Veteran

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 97

sowht wrote:
Jeeesh, Lighten up, Francis.... Stumper67, take a valium or something, I didn't mean to step on your obsession...
It's called imagination, and enjoyable exchange of thoughts on the MOVIE, did you forget it isn't real? Now go back to sharpening your knives and relax a little...
As I said in my post, "I hoped some enjoyed a different line of thought on the "whys" and "hows".... I guess any theory fits in, that's what makes the movie so watchable. Thanks for reading"


Sorry for being a little bit over zealous but I have heard this type of argument fro ma few people and have explained why it's not necessarily true many times... We have no idea what life is capable of on this planet... At one point we didn't even think ANYTHING could exist at the type of pressure that exists at the bottom of the ocean trenches, now we have a plethora of new species that exist in those conditions and we discover new ones every day...

Quote:
Sorry your so caught up in a fake movie, and you needed to get all CAPP LOCKED about it Laughing
(it's not real pal, sorry I to be the one, but someone had to tell you)


No shit it's not real.

Quote:
To all the tight wound people trying to tell everyone else to research the facts before we post (ie starshiptrooper), There are no facts, it's a frigging monster movie that leaves most of the facts to the audience... have some imagination and try to welcome New people to your forum, or are you the resident person who makes everyone else feel they can't talk because their view is different from yours? Laughing Not me, could careless how nuts you get Cool


No, it has nothing to do with your point of view being different from mine... You said that because our weapons were useless against it and there was a huge explosion in New York, that it MUST be from another planet. You basically said that because it doesn't fit the biological conventions that are proved wrong literally everyday on this planet, that it must be extraterrestrial...

I didn't take issue with what you were implying, I took issue with your reasoning... It could absolutely be from another planet... But it could also be native to the Earth, because we have no clue what life might be capable of on our planet.

Quote:
Anyway, it great to see everyone else's theory on the explosion and movie, because they are all right answers and enjoyable to read.


I agree. And like I said, I apologize if I was a bit harsh... But I'm not gonna just sit here and let someone tell me the thing must be from another planet for the reasons you suggested... If I think something is erroneous I'm going to point it out.

Like I said, I had already disputed this same argument 3 or 4 times before coming here and seeing it again... The fact that our weapons don't kill it or harm it enough to subdue it doesn't mean it has to be from another planet.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
longhorn07065
Boot

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 43

i think it was the militarys last attempt to stop it getting to the city

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sowht
Greenhorn

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 4

Understood, just play'in with ya. I know, you know, that is not real, you know? Smile

Your just as right that it could be from earth, matter fact it would sit better with me that our fantastic planet could have such creatures...

I was just making a possible, different take on it, that some may have found enjoyable to read...

Anyway, Maybe "Starshiptropper" was just worked up, like you, at all the newbies, new views, I understand... hay us newbies do suck at first but we are not "green" on other forums and I know how the veterans around here feel, too.

Well met, and thanx

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 6 [86 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group